RULE on Fungal Antigens in Vaccines and Autism

THE FOLLOWING IS A LETTER OF COMPLAINT ABOUT THE INCOMPETENCE OF IDSA AND THE NIH, (See more at 101016.htm, or the Immunology of Epstein-OspA-Borreliosis).

This is evidence that it is known why children acquire the brain damage we call Autism and the mechanisms by which that damage occurs is similar to Lyme- and LYMErix-Disease:

To: sr393d@nih.gov, francis.collins@nih.gov, AllenM1@mail.nih.gov, zach_dann@blumenthal.senate.gov, francis.collins@nih.gov, ras8@cdc.gov, olib@od.nih.gov, afauci@niaid.nih.gov, joseph.breen@nih.gov, michael.greenwood@yale.edu, richard.horton@lancet.com, astrid.james@lancet.com, m.zecevic@lancet.com, ideditorial@lancet.com, Lawrence.Tabak@nih.gov, pgauwaerter@gmail.com

Cc: spinlyme@yahoogroups.com

Subject: A 5-points rule on fungal vaccines and brain-damaged children (failed TB and Lyme fungal vaccines notwithstanding)

Date: May 1, 2012 6:00 AM

Greetings,

I would like to propose a rule on fungal antigens and vaccines
which is related to the OspA outcomes:

1) "Finally, there is the risk that the virus may not be fully or completely inactivated or attenuated and thus, the vaccine may actually cause disease."
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7%2C632%2C510.PN.&OS=PN%2F7%2C632%2C510&RS=PN%2F7%2C632%2C510

2) Measles, Mumps, and Rubella -- Vaccine Use and Strategies for Elimination of Measles, Rubella, and Congenital Rubella Syndrome and Control of Mumps: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00053391.htm

"Updated information on adverse events and contraindications, particularly for persons with severe HIV infection, persons with a history of egg allergy or gelatin allergy, persons with a history of thrombocytopenia, and persons receiving steroid therapy [are immunosuppressed- KMD]."

3) CDC: Human Exposure to Brucella abortus Strain RB51 -- Kansas, 1997
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00051495.htm

An ^^^ immunosuppressed pregnant cow was given a Brucella (LYMErix-like) "live attenuated" vaccine and the baby cow ended up with the disease, which then was transferred to the humans handling the cow and her dead baby. This parallels what is happening to children who are vaccinated while immunosuppressed, or who receive mycoplasmally (LYMErix-like) contaminated vaccines.

4) in the case of pandemic MRSA, as we have seen, the vaccine didn't work because TLR2 agonists (lipoproteins) suppress the immune system. We also learned from the MRSA vaccine patent, that:

"Several established vaccines consist of live attenuated organisms where ***the risk of reversion to the virulent wild-type strain exists. In particular in immunocompromised hosts this can be a live threatening scenario.*** Alternatively, vaccines are administered as a combination of pathogen-derived antigens together with compounds that induce or enhance immune responses against these antigens (these compounds are commonly termed adjuvant), since these subunit vaccines on their own are generally not effective."
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,771,728.PN.&OS=PN/7,771,728&RS=PN/7,771,728

5) The effect of exogenous corticosterone on West Nile virus infection in Northern Cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis) http://7thspace.com/headlines/410671/the_effect_of_exogenous_corticosterone_on_west_nile_virus_...

Do not ^^ cause immunosuppression/stress as
it causes increased mortality from existing
infections and especially do not cause stress to
humans by treating them to *ABUSE* instead
of medicine when they don't the special "controversial"
disease that fits the commercial (unknown) vaccine model:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20466055

Because ^^ that - the abuse - activates Epstein-Barr.

---------------------------------

RULE: Don't give immunosuppressed mammals live attenuated vaccines, and especially don't give them vaccines that contain fungal or mycoplasmal antigens like LYMErix or OspA.

What do you say? Do you like that rule?
Especially if we added the OspA/MS/Roland Martin
"Immunosuppression>> MS Outcome of Lyme" data
to that data set?

What about if we added the 1918 Spanish
Flu data to the rule: "People with strong
(Steere-HLA-like, Dearborn definition-like)
immune responses are likelier to choke to death
on the pneumonia (fungal) that follows the influenza,
whereas immunosuppressed people won't produce a
hyperinflammatory response and thereby survive the
pandemic."

We haven't had any new Rules in a while.

All we ever hear is that "Lyme causes nothing"
and "no disease outcomes happen from Lyme"
and "nothing causes anything" and "Lyme victims
are looney" and "Lyme victims have paranoid
delusional wannabee diseases" and the latest:
"Lyme victims are terrorists !!!":
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21867956

"But get the mysterious unknown OspA vaccine."

- - - - - - -

??

What do you think?

How about that for a rule?

You might have to find out what OspA is, first.

No hurry. It was ordered removed by the FDA
in Feb, 2002 for producing "chronic Lyme-like"
illness (clue).

And that was the last time Uncle Sam said
anything *TRUE* about "Lyme Disease."

10 years....

Kathleen M. Dickson
former Pfizer Analytical Methods Development
and VALIDATION chemist