==================================================
ASEPTIC MENINGITIS IN THE NEWBORN:
http://www.aafp.org/afp/990515ap/2761.html
============================
Clinical Aspects of
Lyme Disease: Dermatologic, Cardiac,
GI, and Gestational
Harry Goldhagen, MS Julie Rawlings,
MPH Disclosures
Like syphilis at the turn of the
previous century,
Lyme disease can be considered the
great impersonator. The myriad clinical
presentations of this multisystem
disease have been part of the diagnostic
dilemma, especially for chronic
Lyme disease. It is often difficult
to determine whether specific symptoms
are caused by Borrelia burgdorferi
or are unrelated but occurring in a
patient with serologic evidence of past
infection.
A number of investigators at the 14th
Lyme Disease Conference examined
less common clinical presentations of
Lyme disease, conditions for which
B burgdorferi is not one of the
usual suspects. These body systems
include the gastrointestinal tract, the
heart, and the skin (not counting the
common dermatologic presentation of
erythema migrans [EM]). And one speaker
discussed the extremely rare syndrome of
congenital
Lyme disease.
Morphea and
Lyme Disease: Are They Related?
Morphea is a rare and untreatable
dermatologic condition characterized by
thickening and induration of the skin
from excess collagen deposition. There
are at least 5 forms of the disease:
localized, generalized, guttate, linear,
and coup de sabre (an indentation that
can extend to and damage the underlying
muscle and bone). The cause is generally
not known, but as with any idiopathic
condition, proposed etiologies abound,
including radiation damage,
autoimmunity, infection, vaccination,
trauma, and genetic predisposition. One
of the leading infectious disease
candidates in the pathogenesis of
morphea is B burgdorferi,
although this association is a subject
of controversy.[1] A number
of European studies have found a
correlation, while most US studies,
including a frequently cited study from
the Mayo Clinic,[2] have
found no evidence of B burgdorferi
in morphea lesions.
Andrew G. Franks, Jr, MD,[3]
of New York University School of
Medicine (NYU), believes there is a
connection between the 2 diseases. For
instance, it can be difficult to
differentiate between EM and certain
morphea lesions, especially if the EM
lesion is not the typical bull's-eye
with central clearing. The differential
diagnosis for EM-like lesions is varied
and can include spider bites, herpes
simplex or zoster, cellulitis, fungus or
tinea, granuloma annulare, drug
eruption, erythema multiforme, and
subacute lupus erythematosus. In many
cases, it can be difficult to culture B burgdorferi from EM lesions.
Part of the disagreement between the
US and other studies may be due to
differences in B burgdorferi serotypes and strains that cause morphea,
according to Dr. Franks. For instance,
only the sensu stricto strain is found
in the United States, but all 3
pathogenic strains are found in Europe.
Two skin diseases -- acrodermatitis
(similar in appearance to scleroderma)
and lymphocytoma -- have been identified
in Europe as linked to B burgdorferi;
the former is associated with the B
afzelii strain, and the latter with
the B garinii strain.
Dr. Franks believes that serologic
testing is unreliable in morphea. He
said that in published US studies of B burgdorferi antibodies in morphea
patients, the investigators did not
check whether the subjects received
antibiotics recently. Antibiotic
treatment can alter the results of
serologic testing. Polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) testing for B
burgdorferi DNA in morphea patients
may also be inaccurate in the US. For
instance, the PCR tests may have been
too specific and missed strains or
serotypes more likely to cause morphea-like
skin disease. European studies have
detected B burgdorferi DNA by PCR
in patients with morphea. For instance,
a PCR study by Fujiwara and colleagues[4]
tested for afzelii and garinii
strains and found evidence of B
burgdorferi in non-US cases. US PCR
amplification has generally only tested
for the sensu stricto strain.
Dr. Franks and colleagues at NYU have
recently completed an unpublished study
of the association of B burgdorferi,
autoimmunity, and morphea. In this
study, 82 patients (average age of 27
years; range, 2-61 years) with new-onset
morphea were enrolled; 14 were male. The
investigators tested for antibody to
autoimmune disease and to B
burgdorferi by IgG and IgM Western
blot (WB), with all bands reported. They
used their own criteria for diagnosis of
underlying
Lyme disease: more than 1 IgG band
on WB was taken as a positive result for
Lyme. None of the subjects had
clinically defined
Lyme disease during the trial. For
autoimmune serology, any positive test
was defined as positive.
For treatment purposes, they
classified the patients into 4 groups,
depending on whether they were positive
by WB and/or autoimmune serology.
Generally, patients with positive WB
received 6 weeks of doxycycline (or an
alternative antibiotic), and those with
negative WB were given 3 weeks of
doxycycline, with an optional additional
3 weeks if improvement was seen during
the first 3 weeks.
Of the 61 patients who completed the
study, 34 had clinical improvement. The
WB-positive, autoimmune
serology-negative group was the most
likely to respond to antibiotic therapy.
The
Lyme WB converted to negative in
many treated patients.
Dr. Franks and colleagues believe
that all patients with morphea are
candidates for a therapeutic antibiotic
trial, regardless of serologic test
results. IgM and IgG WB may be helpful
in the diagnosis, but current
Lyme tests are unreliable in such
patients. Because the risks are minimal
with antibiotics, he believes it is
worth trying this approach, especially
since there is no effective treatment
for morphea at the present time.
The NYU group will be conducting a
second trial, making use of a
recombinant, nested PCR B burgdorferi
assay. They are looking for patients
to enroll in this and future studies. If
you have any new, untreated morphea
patients in your practice, call
917-816-2714 to receive a consent form
and instructions for obtaining a 4-mm
punch biopsy for PCR.
Lyme Disease and the Heart
Cardiac manifestations of
Lyme disease are relatively uncommon
and difficult to diagnose. According to
Kornelia Keszler, MD,[5] of
Yale University School of Medicine, the
most readily recognized feature of
cardiac involvement has been various
degrees of heart block on ECG, which
usually responds to antibiotic therapy.
Typical complaints of
Lyme disease patients with cardiac
involvement are chest pain, mild to
moderate exertional dyspnea, and
palpitations. (However, these symptoms
also may be due to neuropsychiatric
problems and musculoskeletal infection,
so testing is important.) To evaluate
such patients, cardiac testing should
include thallium stress
electrocardiography (ECG) and coronary
angiography.
What does cardiac infection look
like, and where are the organisms
localized? Stanek and colleagues[6]
found thickening of the walls of small
endomysial vessels and infiltration by
mononuclear cells. In murine studies,
Pachner and colleagues[7]
found 3 predominant locations for B
burgdorferi in the heart. In mice
infected for less than a month,
spirochetes could be found mostly around
blood vessels. By contrast, for longer
infection periods, B burgdorferi could also be seen in cardiac myocytes,
often surrounded by clear areas. B
burgdorferi were also commonly found
among collagen fibers.
Based on her series of cases and a
review of the literature, Dr. Keszler
drew the following conclusions. Thallium
imaging typically reveals diffuse and
patchy uptake of isotope in the
myocardium, probably indicating
involvement of the small vessels of the
heart. Patients generally experience
decreased exertional tolerance, as
exhibited by a rapid increase in heart
rate, but there is no ECG evidence of
ischemia to account for the decreased
tolerance. A variety of arrhythmias are
seen, both ventricular and
supraventricular, and are more common
than heart block. At this time, it is
not known whether treatment of
Lyme disease will alter the thallium
imaging. However, one study has found
that cardiac abnormalities do not
persist in patients treated for
Lyme disease.[8]
Lyme Disease and the GI Tract
Lyme disease generally does not
affect the GI tract alone, according to
Martin D. Fried, MD,[9] of
the Jersey Shore Medical Center,
Neptune, New Jersey. Rather, GI disease
is typically only one component of a
systemic disease. Patients with
Lyme disease can present with a
variety of GI symptoms, including
abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, acid
reflux, or blood in the stool.
Children may develop encopresis --
the loss of bowel training -- which may
indicate a neurologic effect of the
spirochete.
Evaluation of patients suspected of
having
Lyme disease includes the
ever-important history, physical
examination, CBC, liver function tests,
and endoscopic examination. The
Lyme WB is generally not helpful,
but PCR testing of biopsy specimens for
B burgdorferi OspA can be useful.
Silver staining of biopsy specimens can
reveal spirochetes. For those who test
positive by PCR, RNA polymerase testing
of the biopsy sample can indicate
whether the spirochetes are actively
multiplying.
The differential diagnosis includes
the majority of gastrointestinal
diseases, such as pancreatitis, stool
infections, peptic ulcer, Crohn's
disease, and inflammatory bowel disease.
Skin tags are an indication that the
patient has Crohn's rather than a
complication of
Lyme disease. Crohn's patients have
a malabsorption syndrome and are
therefore generally underweight. By
contrast, those with GI
Lyme disease often also have fatigue
or arthritis, and the inactivity may
make them overweight.
Treatment involves antibiotics, but
regular follow-up is important to detect
recurrences and lack of response. Dr.
Fried has seen B burgdorferi persist in the GI tract despite multiple
rounds of antibiotics over many years.
Gestational and Congenital
Lyme Disease
Any infectious disease contracted
during pregnancy has the potential to be
transmitted to the fetus.
Tessa D.
Gardner, MD,[10] of
Washington University School of
Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, who has
recently written an extensive chapter on
the subject,[11] discussed
the rare conditions of gestational and
congenital
Lyme disease (borreliosis) and the
best approaches (based on limited case
reports) to diagnosis and treatment.
How rare are these conditions?
According to published figures,
16,000-17,000 cases of
Lyme disease are reported each year
in the United States. Roughly 8000 cases
are in women, and approximately
1200-3400 cases are in women of
childbearing age (20-49 years old). Dr.
Gardner did some back-of-the
envelope estimates to get a sense of how
many cases of gestational
Lyme disease may be occurring. If
you assume that one quarter of the women
in the child-bearing age group are
pregnant (a gross overestimate, by Dr.
Gardner's admission), and that 10%
are either untreated or inadequately
treated, and that one fifth transmit the
organism to the fetus or newborn, this
calculates to approximately 40 cases of
congenital
Lyme disease a year in the United
States. It would be unusual for any
large city to have more than 1 or 2
cases a year, and it would be extremely
rare for any physician to see more than
a few cases in a lifetime.
Dr.
Gardner has conducted an extensive
literature review (through 1998) that
turned up 263 cases.[10] She
found that 25% resulted in adverse
outcomes: 8% resulted in fetal death and
2% in neonatal death. Fifteen percent of
the babies were liveborn but were ill or
had an abnormality. The effect of
antibiotic therapy was dramatic in these
patients: with antibiotics, 85% of
neonates were normal, while 15% had an
adverse outcome. In striking contrast,
without antibiotics, only 33% were
normal, while 67% had an adverse
outcome. The conclusion: Proper, prompt
diagnosis and antibiotic therapy are
vital for healthy neonates born with
congenital
Lyme disease.
However, it can be quite difficult to
recognize such a rare disease. The
differential diagnosis is extensive and
includes sepsis/meningoencephalitis
(bacterial or viral), other congenital
infectious diseases (eg, syphilis,
leptospirosis, relapsing fever,
toxoplasmosis), congenital heart or bone
disease, inherited or infectious
immunodeficiency, sudden infant death
syndrome, and more. A history suggestive
of
Lyme disease in the mother or
positive serologic or other tests for B burgdorferi can suggest the
diagnosis. Dr.
Gardner has provided a list of clues
to the various presentations of
congenital
Lyme disease (Table). One
interesting radiologic clue is "celery
stalking" -- lucent metaphyseal bands --
on the long bones of the neonate. These
are occasionally seen in infants with
gestational syphilis or viral
infections. In 2 neonates Dr.
Gardner has treated, the bands
disappeared shortly after treatment.
Table. Signs and Symptoms of
Congenital
Lyme Borreliosis
| Stage |
Mild Early |
Severe Early |
Late |
| Onset |
Usually first 2 weeks of life |
Usually first week of life |
Usually > 2 wks and < 2 yrs of
age |
| Maternal gestational
Lyme borreliosis
|
Usually first or second
trimester |
Usually first or second
trimester |
Usually second or third
trimester |
| Signs and symptoms |
- Mild suspected sepsis or
meningoencephalitis
- Hyperbilirubinemia
- Adenopathy
- Rash
- Intrauterine growth
retardation
- Miscellanous anomalies (eg,
genitourinary [GU], skeletal,
cardiac)
|
- Severe suspected sepsis or
meningoencephalitis
- Respiratory distress
- Perinatal death
- Intrauterine growth
retardation
- Fever
- Rash
- Adenopathy,
hepatosplenomegaly
- Hyperbilirubinemia
- Miscellaneous anomalies (eg,
GU, skeletal, cardiac)
|
- Subacute illness
- Developmental delay/meningoencephalitis
- Growth retardation/failure
to thrive
- Prematurity
- Fever
- Adenopathy
- Rash
- Hepatosplenomegaly
- Miscellaneous anomalies (eg,
GU, skeletal, cardiac)
|
| Prematurity? |
< 4 weeks |
< 5 weeks |
-- |
The prognosis
for gestational
Lyme disease is good if diagnosed
and treated adequately. The prognosis
for neonates with early congenital
Lyme disease depends on prompt
diagnosis, especially in severe early
cases. Similarly, the prognosis in late
congenital
Lyme depends not only on prompt
diagnosis and treatment, but also on the
extent of irreversible damage present at
the time of diagnosis. Long-term
follow-up is important for detecting
possible recurrence of disease.
This summer, Dr.
Gardner will be starting the North
American Gestational and Congenital
Lyme Disease Watch to evaluate the
relationship of various factors
(clinical and laboratory
characteristics, antibiotic regimens) to
outcomes for gestational
Lyme disease, and to evaluate short-
and long-term outcomes (infants,
stillborns, miscarriages) of pregnancies
complicated by
Lyme disease and develop clinical
and laboratory case definitions of these
outcomes. Interested people (physicians
and affected women) can enroll on the
Internet once the sites are launched in
July 2001:
www.LymeInPregnancy.org
www.GestationalLyme.org
www.CongenitalLyme.org
References
- Weide B, Walz T, Garbe C. Is
morphoea caused by Borrelia
burgdorferi? A review. Br J
Dermatol. 2000;142:636-644. Abstract
available at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10792212&dopt=Abstract
- Hoesly JM, Mertz LE, Winkelmann RK.
Localized scleroderma (morphea) and
antibody to Borrelia burgdorferi.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:455-458.
Abstract available at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3308981&dopt=Abstract
- Franks A. Evidence for Borrelia
burgdorferi as an etiologic agent
in morphea. Program and abstracts of
the 14th International Scientific
Conference on
Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne
Disorders; April 21-23, 2001;
Hartford, Connecticut.
- Fujiwara H, Fujiwara K, Hashimoto
K, et al. Detection of Borrelia
burgdorferi DNA (B garinii
or B afzelii) in morphea and
lichen sclerosus et atrophicus tissues
of German and Japanese but not of US
patients. Arch Dermatol.
1997;133:41-44. Abstract available at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9006371&dopt=Abstract
- Keszler K. Cardiac manifestations
of
Lyme disease. Program and
abstracts of the 14th International
Scientific Conference on
Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne
Disorders; April 21-23, 2001;
Hartford, Connecticut.
- Stanek G, Klein J, Bittner R,
Glogar D. Isolation of Borrelia
burgdorferi from the myocardium of
a patient with longstanding
cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med.
1990;322:249-252.
- Pachner AR, Basta J, Delaney E,
Hulinska D. Localization of Borrelia burgdorferi in murine
Lyme borreliosis by electron
microscopy. Am J Trop Med Hyg.
1995;52:128-133. Abstract available
at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7872439&dopt=Abstract
- Sangha O, Phillips CB, Fleischmann
KE, et al. Lack of cardiac
manifestations among patients with
previously treated
Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med.
1998;128:346-353. Abstract available
at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9490594&dopt=Abstract
- Fried M. Gastrointestinal
manifestations of
Lyme disease. Program and
abstracts of the 14th International
Scientific Conference on
Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne
Disorders; April 21-23, 2001;
Hartford, Connecticut.
-
Gardner T.
Lyme disease in pregnancy. Program
and abstracts of the 14th
International Scientific Conference on
Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne
Disorders; April 21-23, 2001;
Hartford, Connecticut.
-
Gardner T.
Lyme disease. In: Remington J,
Klein JO, eds. Infectious Diseases
of the Fetus and Newborn Infant.
Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2001:
519-641.
Suggested Reading
MacDonald AB. Gestational
Lyme borreliosis. Implications for
the fetus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am.
1989;15:657-677. Abstract available at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2685924&dopt=Abstract
Maraspin V, Cimperman J,
Lotric-Furlan S, et al. Treatment of
erythema migrans in pregnancy. Clin
Infect Dis. 1996;22:788-793. Abstract
available at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8722932&dopt=Abstract
| Section 1 of 1 |
|

Copyright ? 2001 Medscape Portals,
Inc. |