Previous
Class Action Talk:
The
Class Action is against the State of CT for being in possession of records
which show that “Lyme disease” - a fraudulent “disease” concoction - intended
to sell a bogus Lyme vaccine and not find treatable cases of Lyme disease, and
then the Defendant, The State of CT said those scientific records meant I am
insane. Lyme borreliosis is the proper definition of the infection. Spirochetes are parasites. See the proper illness description by Lenny
Sigal as “Lyme borreliosis” right before he goes into his criminal inference
that Chronic Lyme borreliosis is Munchausen’s.
The
patients themselves have had to file the class action on Lyme because the docs
don’t understand the fraud, and all the lawyers in Corrupticut are too afraid
of retaliation by the State’s Attorney’s Office- which is the nature of the
lawsuit. Color of Law abuses; No first
amendment rights; only wealthy people have rights; the criminals here are
usually actually the victims of crime, or victims of the State’s incompetence.
===========
Kathleen
M. Dickson, and COMPLAINT
on
behalf of Lara E. Dickson,
Diane
M. Dickson, David D. Dickson, et al,
and
on behalf of all Families and
Children
of the State of Connecticut
In
the cause of a class action: CA
05- 328 Torres
v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT US DISTRICT COURT
1
Exchange Terrace
Providence,
Rhode Island 02903
28
January 2006
APPEAL OF DECISION DATED JANUARY 12, 2006, WHICH THE PLAINTIFF DICKSON HAS NOT YET RECEIVED, BUT READ ABOUT ONLINE ON THE SCI.MED.DISEASES.LYME INTERNET NEWSGROUP ON JANUARY 28, 2006
STATUS:
The
court has determined that the Plaintiff’s do not have a cause for a class
action, wherein the class action is primarily over 1) Color of Law Abuses, 2)
discrimination by the Defendant against all kinds of persons, 3) lack of access
to redress for grievances through all channels set up in Connecticut
specifically for these purposes, 4) the State of Connecticut is 100%
incompetent to all health and care related commissions and services, especially
the 5) Connecticut Department of Children and Families, who are well known by
all to be 100% incompetent and unaccountable, and yet the Plaintiffs have
provided documentary evidence in cases for all of these claims.
Amendment XIV: No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Multiple violations of this right to due process by the
Defendant is the primary nature of this complaint, via, discrimination, Color
of Law abuses, deprived of the right of sue process, chronic and persistent and
pervasive false arrests to protect the guilty.
The
Plaintiffs have shown cause for action, have shown evidence of discrimination,
have provided case examples to both the Defendant and the court, and the
Plaintiff has demonstrated that the USDOJ District of CT is incompetent to the
protection of CT citizens: The US.
Attorney for Connecticut is an appointee of the now incarcerated former CT
Governor Rowland, because Mrs. US Attorney KEVIN J. O’CONNOR worked in
Rowland’s legal office during the Rowlandgate crimes. As reported in the Hartford Courant, Nov 6, 2005:
"Connecticut's
political world is tiny and given to ennui. Witness the fact that the U.S. Attorney, Kevin
O'Connor, was barred from participating in the prosecution of the Rowland
scandals because of his and his wife's close ties to the former governor.
Kathleen O'Connor worked in the office of Rowland's legal counsel. In most
places, that would raise an alarm. Connecticut
only shrugs."
Additionally,
CT AAG JOHN TUCKER has misrepresented himself to the RI Federal Court as
eligible to represent the Defendant. He
is a potential witness for the Plaintiffs.
The
Plaintiff has requested the assistance of the Internal Revenue Service, the
Social Security Administration Fraud Allegation Management Division, and the
United States Department of Justice Criminal Civil Rights Division to assist in
the investigations of fraud committed against the United States, by the State
of Connecticut, Department of Children and Families, et al, and Yale
University, indirectly. These claims
fall under Qui Tam, False Claims Act, to which JOHN TUCKER has had plenty of
time to respond, as demonstrated in EXHIBIT 05-328-060128-01. The 27 October 2005 document sent to CT AAG
JOHN TUCKER document states:
Dear Mr. Tucker-
Please take this to your staff patent attorneys to
confirm.
Verify independently that this is the text of the
Yale patent US # 5, 618, 533
===========
This means they have the ability to diagnose Lyme
(borreliosis) accurately and early but they chose not to because they chose to
make more money on a bogus vaccine instead.
The "CLAIM" of the patent, if you look at
it, is a fragment of DNA code, which means no one can use this unless licensed
by Yale- which means they have a monopoly on testing and they prefer we
don't have it available to us.
Yale’s own validation is written within the claim of
this patent 5, 618,533 and is well-described.
UCONN’s Henry
Feder tested the OspA vaccine on children in Europe when he knew that would do
them no good and in fact, was harmful. This vaccine never should have
gone to human trials.
Yale has an early and accurate test for Lyme, but
did not use it, when all agree that early treatment gives better patient
results.
This is CT’s disease.
We have children in CT.
Lyme borreliae can infect the brain and does in 2/3 of the cases
(Dattwyler published data).
It kind of makes sense to detect Lyme as early as possible to
prevent this infection from reaching the brain and causing brain damage to
children.
The State’s resistance to this concept is unforgivably
incompetent, abusive, and technically is child abuse and medical neglect.
-
- -
The Yale Flagellin Patent Validation is right
in the text of the patent:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/
netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5618533.WKU.&OS=PN/5618533&RS=PN/5618533
(snip, text
of patent)
What that means is
that there is no arguing the validity of my claim that Yale committed a
crime. This is their own patent claim and validation.
You should be investigating and prosecuting this and
not me. LymeRIX was scientific fraud. I have already given several
of the State’s Attorneys this data. I gave AAG Tom Ryan the Dearborn
booklet and the old CDC published standard in the summer of 2003. I have
been in communication with you before. I believe it was over my complaint
against the State to the CT Commission on Human Rights in Waterbury.
False
Claims Act à Allen Steere’s 1993
blood testing standard for Lyme. All the US grants that were paid out
upon that bogus standard, such as Klempner’s chronic Lyme “study” were also
false claims. The validity of the Yale Lyme vaccine qualification was a
false claim, and they obviously knew it, since this is their earlier VALID
diagnostic test.
http://whistleblowerlaws.com/protection.htm
I give the State
the data, the State is not supposed to harass and abuse us, in response.
The potential claims against Yale are huge. Yale cannot say the above is
not a validation: It is Accurate, Specific, Early and tested empirically
in the field.
KMDickson
CC: Gonzales, Chertoff, Goss, Mueller, Rendell, Sheller,
Blumenthal, Milstein, McGuigan, Spitzer, Droney, Dorsey, Chatigny, Torres,
Fitzgerald
CT AAG JOHN TUCKER did not respond logically,
competently, or, at all, further supporting Plaintiff’s claim that the
Defendant, the State of Connecticut, is
100% incompetent to its residents and with willfully malignant intent.
The Plaintiff has shown previously that the State of
Connecticut has defrauded the United States as regards the CT DCF and the DHHS
ACF Temporary Aid to Needy Families.
The amount defrauded in that report by CT Voices for Children was $88
million dollars in US TANF earmarked to prevent removals of children
out of $113.7 million in fiscal year 2003.
88 million dollars of the 113.7 million dollars receive by the State of
Connecticut intended specifically to assist families stay together,
did not go to the families, but instead into the pockets of the DCF staff and
to create three new DCF positions. $88
million in fraud in one year alone, against the federal government of the
United States, and the Plaintiff’s have no cause of action? This is only one specific data point already
submitted as evidence.
As previously mentioned, the Chief Justice of the Second Circuit (CT Appeals Court) is a relative of the war criminal’s in the White House, GEORGE W. BUSH, JOHN M. WALKER. WALKER is also associated with Yale University and would therefore have to recuse himself from an appeal to that court. GEORGE W. BUSH’s cabal in the White House includes an Attorney General who has decided to declare that it is legal for GEORGE W. BUSH break the law and that the rules established to support the FISA court and the judges appointed to it are moot, because it is GEORGE W. BUSH who we are talking about- the argument being that we may have finally discovered a condition where a person is above the law, and that condition is GEORGE W. BUSH.
Whether or not the definition of “a person” has been
changed, remains to be seen, when the hearings occur on these secret FBI
illegal wiretaps.
From The Washington Post, 28 Jan 2006:
Critics: FISA has "emergency authorizations"
to allow 72-hour surveillance without a court order that the administration
could easily utilize.
Administration: The Justice Department
does not approve emergency authorizations without knowing it will receive court
approval within 72 hours.
It appears that we will see whether or not GEORGE W.
BUSH’s cognitive abilities, ability to store and retrieve facts, and
decision-making abilities are inherently, by nature, superior to any sitting US
judge’s, court’s, or person’s.
If it becomes true that GEORGE W. BUSH has Divinely endowed powers and
abilities, then we, the people, do not have a country, Constitution, or Bill of
Rights, and the US courts will have become an international farce, instead of
just a national farce, as evidenced by the Connecticut courts, and now this
decision by the RI federal court.
Plaintiff respectfully asks the court to postpone
the decision to dismiss for 60 days, pending the outcome of the upcoming “IS
GEORGE W. BUSH AN ABSOLUTE DICTATOR OR A PRESIDENT?” illegal wiretapping
hearings, and a proper IRS, SSA and USDOJ Criminal Civil Rights Division
investigation of the continued and chronic frauds upon the people of
Connecticut and the United States by the Defendant.
If the Plaintiff had filed this fraud, Color of Law,
discrimination and multiple 14th Amendment violations complaint
against the State of Connecticut in the District of Connecticut, we would be
now facing this very appeal to an uncle of the criminal in the White House who
is also associated with the indirect Defendant, Yale University, who committed
the scientific fraud as regards the definition of “Lyme disease,” validating
the Plaintiff’s position that this complaint should be filed in a federal
jurisdiction outside of Connecticut.
It should also be noted that Connecticut has decided
that one’s own property is only one’s own property until the time comes that
the property has greater potential value to someone else who just plain wants
it. That decision, to the Plaintiff Dickson’s
knowledge is under appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, and the
new candidate, Samuel Alito, is believed to be in contempt of the concept of
three co-equal branches of government, or, is in favor of the United States
becoming a dictatorship- that dictatorship being under the nephew of the Chief
Justice of the Appeals Court for Connecticut, the Defendant, GEORGE W. BUSH.
Given all of the above, the District of RI believes
there is no cause for a class action against the State of Connecticut. Again this reasoning drives one to an
awareness of the pervasive lack of reasoning as the State of the Union.
Plaintiff’s therefore request a postponement of
decision to dismiss the complaint for 60 days, 1) pending a request for
assistance from the United States to recover fraud damages from the Defendant
as a participant of this complaint against the State of Connecticut, and which
is 2) logically to be prosecuted in a jurisdiction where there is no conflict
of interest, or dependent upon the mercy of a relative of the lunatic in the
White House to recuse himself, Justice JOHN M. WALKER and which is 3) logically
dependent upon the decision by Congress in the upcoming weeks as to whether or
not GEORGE W. BUSH broke the law as regards his disregard for the FISA courts
in obtaining “national security” information through wiretapping.
CERTIFICATION
This document was mailed or faxed to the following entities
Richard
Blumenthal
Connecticut
Attorney General
55
Elm Street
Hartford,
CT USA 860-808-5387 fax
Social
Security Fraud Allegation Management
Office
of the Inspector General
PO
Box 17768
Baltimore
MD, 21235-7768
Karla
Dobinski
Deputy
Chief
Criminal
Section, Civil Rights Division
United
States Department of Justice
950
Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington,
DC, 20530
Internal
Revenue Service
United
States of America
This ____ Day of February 2006
Kathleen
M. Dickson, et al
23
Garden Street
Pawcatuck,
CT 06379
http://actionlyme.org
05-328-T Appeal to deny decision to dismiss for 60
days to await the outcome of the decision by Congress to impeach and indict
“President” George W. Bush for breaking the law as regards the illegal
wiretapping, for his criminal insanity, and for his war crimes of knowingly and
willingly, fraudulent claims for attacking Iraq in March 2003
– AND –
for
the United States Department of Justice and Social Security fraud allegation
management to come to their senses and
assist in the prosecution of the scientific fraud in Lyme disease, because CT
AAG John Tucker prefers to be irresponsible and vicious towards CT citizens,
rather than performing his job protecting us. 01 Feb 2006
Appeal
is Granted/ Denied
JUDGE CLERK