24 May 2012
HOME
Natural Remedies
Lyme/LYMErix Cryme
Reveals New Paradigm in
Health/Disease:
"Bacterial/Viral Coinfections";
TLR2 (fungi)Signaling Depletes IRAK1 and Inhibits Induction of Type 1 by TLR7/9 (viruses)-- -CV Harding, 2012 (More in the chart at the bottom of this homepage)
"Bacterial/Viral Coinfections";
TLR2 (fungi)Signaling Depletes IRAK1 and Inhibits Induction of Type 1 by TLR7/9 (viruses)-- -CV Harding, 2012 (More in the chart at the bottom of this homepage)
"Multiple Mechanisms of Immune Suppression by B Lymphocytes" (New and Trashes Yale and IDSA)
NIH's Treatment Recommendations for Chronic Active Epstein-Borreliosis, the chronic illness also induced by OspA vaccination or exposure to molds.
ELISA = arbitrary cutoff.
Disclaimer
1998, CIA Oilmen & Israelis plan to overthrow Saddam for the oil.
Bush/Gore Oil/War-(Oct,2000)
Bush's own explainer (Oct
2000) re:
Iraq Oil
The highest level of justice in this state is certifiably as corrupt as a three dollar bill
Nominate Someone Else April 27 2006 Peter T. Zarella's request to Gov. M. Jodi Rell to withdraw his nomination for chief justice of the state Supreme Court sounded ominously tentative. She might renominate him after the storm pounding the high court subsides. With all due respect, Mrs. Rell should fill Connecticut's top judicial post with someone else. Associate Justice Zarella has been compromised too much by a fellow jurist to take over a job that requires the highest standard of conduct. Justice Zarella has compromised himself as well. The booby prize for poor judgment goes to William J. Sullivan, who now admits that in March, while he was still chief justice, he directed subordinates not to release a highly controversial decision in a case regarding open government. He wanted to wait until after the legislative hearings on Justice Zarella's nomination. Such politically driven manipulation should have no place in the judicial system. Justice Sullivan, who remains on the state payroll as a senior jurist, engaged in extraordinarily reckless behavior. Yet he insists he has not violated the Code of Judicial Conduct. Whether the Judicial Review Council is investigating is - as you might guess - a secret. That fits the pattern of secrecy that continues to shroud the high court. Under the Sullivan regime, for example, certain divorce cases were arbitrarily sealed. Even the names of the sealing judge and litigants were classified. In time, Justice Sullivan and his close colleague, Justice Zarella - serving as head of the judiciary's rules committee - relented, but only partially. It's apparently hard to kick an addiction to secrecy. Last year, the court heard arguments on whether computerized dockets of criminal and motor vehicle cases were subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Writing for the 4-3 majority in March, Justice Sullivan held that the data aren't subject to public access. Justice Sullivan did not want Justice Zarella's confirmation to be compromised by the fact that the two were on the same side in a controversial case that involved that old obsession, secrecy. So the order went out to the office of the Reporter of Judicial Decisions to keep the ruling under wraps. But the Sullivan machination was not nearly as devastating to Justice Zarella's nomination to be chief as the letter Justice Zarella wrote to acting Chief Justice David M. Borden on Sunday. In that letter, Justice Zarella sounded like a champion of open government and reminded Justice Borden that he (Zarella) intended to tell the governor and lawmakers about the Sullivan matter. Justice Borden shot back that he recalled no such statements from Justice Zarella and proceeded to set the record straight. Justice Borden replied that the Zarella letter contained inaccuracies and created "misleading impressions." He all but accused Justice Zarella of lying. Justice Zarella may be an excellent lawyer, a talented writer of court decisions, a bon vivant, a loyal friend to people in high places and a member of the governor's political party. But promotion to chief justice requires much more. It requires deep wisdom, impeccable judgment and an unwavering commitment to open government. Surely Mrs. Rell can do better by choosing a chief justice who has the highest respect for the letter as well as the spirit of the law, who comes with minimal political baggage and who pledges to end the secrecy that tars the highest chamber of justice. Copyright 2006, Hartford Courant |