This first chapter of
Cryme Disease deals
with Scientific Validity and Yale's Valid Antibody test (flagellin).
It contains a primer in the form of a PowerPoint presentation. This
chapter should not be read exclusive of the
Primers Shell Game chapter, because together they show that scientific
incompetence is not the only phenomenon at work among the Yale/ALDF.com
crooks. There have been scientifically valid tests for Lyme or
spirochetes available since the early 1990s and were used by the crooks when
convenient.
The very first thing you
need to know about Lyme is that it
is technically called
Relapsing
Fever.
Here is why:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=138
Click on the larger texted
heading, "Borrelia" in the
above link. You will see
that the taxonomic categorization of
these organisms is based on
differences in their flagellin,
because that is the genetic species
distinguisher - and not OspA or any
of the plasmid DNA.
All Borrelia are
arthropod-borne. That is why
they are called borrelia. That
is why they're distinct from other
spirochetes. And if they are
parasites, they cause disease in
some way.
Cryme
Disease, Chp 1 (Murphy's Law: It
could only have happened in Corrupticut)
Chapter 1, Scientific Validity.
Please see the
PowerPoint Explainer on Scientific Validity:
http://www.actionlyme.org/SV_PPT_1.ppt
Here is the original 1991 Fikrig/Flavell report that goes with the
USPTO.gov # 5,618,533 patent:
http://iai.asm.org/cgi/reprint/59/10/3531?view=long&pmid=1894359
Look at the graphic on page 3533.
Yale's Fikrig and Flavell are clearly selecting out a section of flagellar DNA that does not cross react with antibodies against flagella from other organisms, which means it is a SPECIFIC test for Borrelia burgdorferi flagellin antibodies, which almost all Lyme victims have.
Why wasn't this test used to assess the outcome of Yale's other, later, patent, the LYMErix vaccine?
Even CDC "officer" Alan Barbour in US patent 5,436,000 proposed such a concept when he patented the flagellar-less spirochete:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/5,436,000
CHAPTER 1,
What is meant by
"scientifically valid"
This is
data the Lyme 180s (Yale/NYMC/ALDF/IDSA/Kaiser
cabal) refused to turn over to the Connecticut Attorney General for
a year and a half before
settling out of court.
FDA Rules on Analytical Validations
FDA Rules on the VALIDATION of an Analytical Method
Specificity (only detects one thing)
Accuracy (data from known concentrations is all over the place, but
never should detect "none" as is the case with Lyme Western Blotting and the
Lyme ELISA, especially)
Limit of Detection (the opposite of Steere's "receiver operating
characteristic" below)
Precision (system has integrity in performance)
Ruggedness (anyone can run the test with their own equipment
and get the same results)
Linearity (concentration range of analyte for which the test is
valid) in and out of matrix
As far as we can tell, there are
plenty of personal spirochetes for whom humans are allowed to be hosts, as
long as we don’t call any of them “Lyme Disease®,” since that’s trade marked
concept, is meant to be associated LYMErix®, and is the imaginary autoimmune
arthritis in a knee invented by CDC officer Allen Steere while he was in
Europe in the early 1990s. We will get to a more specific description of what
exactly “Lyme Disease” is in later chapters, but first one must acquire
scientific-validity-speak.
In this book we will freely make up new words.
We’re talking “medicine,” here, and as most people know,
new diseases are being invented all the time, with the same frequency
as BigPharma and psychiatry expand products and associated diseases,
while BigInsurance attempts to narrow the definitions of those diseases.
For example, Pfizer invented “erectile dysfunction,” while BigInsurance
invented that the “antiphospholipid syndrome” should replace “Lupus,”
raising the bar on how many antibodies one may have in order to have an
“illness.” BigInsurance and BigPharma together invent vector-borne
diseases, since Kaiser-Permanente and SmithKline established the “American
Lyme Disease Foundation” or the ALDF.com at New York Medical College in
New York in association with, primarily, Yale.
Ever since the Bayh-Dole
Act, the overall principle of commercialized vector-borne diseases is that:
WHEREAS these are new emerging infectious diseases as a result of global
warming, they are, according to CDC’s Alan Barbour, “a rich vein of gold
from which to mine virulence
determinants.”
That is, the diseases will
only exist if they are a benefit to the “Lyme Disease” cabal at New York
Medical College and at Yale. Treatment for them is not intended, but vaccines
and test kits are to be sold. That is, as each vaccine becomes available,
then the world will hear about how serious that disease is. But in the
meantime, the victims will be told they’re crazy and don’t have a real
disease.
In order to completely
understand the scientific fraud in “Lyme Disease,” one has to understand the
concept of “scientific validity.” IN ALL SERIOUSNESS: These “scientifically
valid” concepts apply to other medical situations one encounters and is an
excellent tool to guard yourselves against psychiatric charlatans and the
incompetence of the Food and Drug Administration.
The current CDC-promoted
Western Blot (gel electrophoresis) testing for “Lyme Disease” does not meet
the requirements of the FDA’s rules for a scientifically valid test. The Lyme
ELISA does not even come close to detecting any cases of “Lyme Disease” and
will be discussed in later chapters.
A test or method is
scientifically valid if:
1) It detects only one
species (SPECIFICITY)
2) It is precise (refers to
the equipment’s performance)
3) The test does not suffer
a matrix ("inert ingredients") effect or any other effect through a range of
concentrations (LINEARITY)
4) The test is ACCURATE*
5) RUGGEDNESS – the same
results are acquired on different equipment
6) The test must demonstrate
its Limit of Detection (LOD) or limit of quantitation. This last criteria is
what analytical chemistry is all about. We always want to improve the LOD,
since we want to detect smaller and smaller quantities of something reliably.
If left to The 180s, in the “Lyme disease” scam we would be going in the
opposite direction. If for example, the Lyme 180s were Cancer 180s, you would not be allowed to have a diagnosis
of cancer unless it were in the terminal stages or you were already dead.
In most applications of
assessing drug potency or outcomes, the method is published in the United
States or European Pharmacopoeia.
*In the case of “Lyme
Disease” Western Blotting, the Accuracy we will take to mean the
percentage of cases that are known to be positive (through
DNA testing of EM rash or spinal fluid) that are found to be positive by
Western Blotting or through the identification of Lyme- or Borreliae- (no
typo) specific antibody bands.
We, the normal people (and
not the Centers for Disease Control or the National Institutes of Health or
the Food and Drug Administration or the Infectious Diseases Society of
America, not the insurance companies and not the American Medical Association,
and not the American College of Physicians and not the American Psychiatric
Association…), want to detect every case of a spirochetal infection especially
if that person is sick. We realize this is a revolutionary concept,
identifying sick people and trying to understand what is the cause of it and
thus to treat it to effect 100% recovery from the suffering from illness, but
we’re willing to take the risks and prove the world is round.
Gel electrophoresis is
Western Blotting is a form of analytical chemistry known as chromatography,
or Separations Science. A mix of components is given to the analyst he/she is supposed to identify and quantitate whatever is in the mix.
In the case of Relapsing
Fever or “Lyme Disease,” we are talking about identifying antibodies that
could only have been produced if from exposure to spirochetes. It is said
that Lyme spirochetes are difficult to culture from blood, which may or may
not be true. It is part of the criminal condition of “Lyme Disease” that we
don’t routinely use proper DNA or RNA methods to identify “Lyme Disease” in the
blood, nor are we necessarily investigating the correct blood components for
Borrelial DNA, such as blood cells, since Borrelia are known to be
intracellular in blood cells, red and white. Many scientists in the Lyme
crime world do use the proper DNA and RNA when trying to amplify for detecting
spirochetes to patent from ticks, but these methods (the proper DNA primers)
are not available for everyday use in the detection (diagnosis) of a
borreliosis infection in humans (a criminal matter).
As boring as it might seem
at first, there is no way around understanding what Separations Science and
how that applies to the “Lyme Disease” crimes. The authors will give three
examples:
1) light and prism-
Everyone understands what
happens to light when it passes through a prism. The density of the glass
causes the different wavelengths of light to separate out into apparent bands
or colors.
2) plant proteins-
Many people remember
separating plant proteins in grammar or high school. Mashed plant leaves are
placed in a spot on paper and in some sort of solvent (water, methanol,
acetonitrile, isopropanol, hexanes, etc.) the various pigments under green
separate out.
Imagine trying to quantify
those pigments and come up for a number that corresponds to the amount of
crushed leaves you tried to spot onto the paper to separate into the various
pigments. That is the world of the analytical chemist – a world of true
reality to which all are more than welcome.
Other types of
chromatography:
3) high performance liquid
chromatography
4) gas chromatography
5) gel electrophoresis
6) ion chromatography
7) capillary electrophoresis, etc.
Detectors
and signal amplifiers
For a demonstration of what
happens in a real analytical chemistry lab one has to envision the following
This is (sort of) a
schematic of high performance liquid chromatography where the end result is a
chromatogram and the various species in the mix are separated out as
individual peaks. In comparison to a Western Blot, which is gel
electrophoresis chromatography, each peak would be a band. One can
hopefully envision that these peaks have a more generally even shape. Each
peak represents a band or a species or an analyte that has been separated
out. The equipment (detector and integrator) amplifies the absorbance or the
extent to which each entity separated out in the molecular sieve caused the
light beam in the detector to modify a signal through it.
Samples are
compared to known standard concentrations of the analyte. One calculates the difference
between the peak area of the standard and that of the sample.
In the real world of the
laboratory, the results have to be certain and reported along with a
statistical analysis of the degree of certainty
of the results. That is,
for each peak or analyte, in the real world of modern laboratory, this
determination of peak area or quantitation work is very sophisticated and
precise. The FDA rules for the validation of an analytical method
include: Specificity (the TEST identifies ONLY ONE SPECIES), Ruggedness
(works on all standard equipment), Precision (refers to perfection of the
physical analytical system itself), Accuracy (identifies 100% of all
incidents of the analyte and the system responds reliably well), Linearity
(system or method detects the analyte in question in and out of inert
ingredients through a range of concentrations) and Limit of Detection (what
is the baseline limit of noise).
At the Dearborn, Michigan, CDC conference (CHAPTER
3),
it was thought by the invited attendees that they would be standardizing the
METHOD (the 6 basic parameters here, as they apply to Borrelia and Western
Blotting), but instead they found out that the "interpretation of results"
was the goal.
In the beginning of the development of an
analysis method, we want to be certain that what we are looking
at, each peak (or antibody band) corresponds to only one entity. In the following graphic
(diode array), an attempt is made to demonstrate how we prove one species is
being identified as one peak at the specific retention time (a
characteristic of the analyte in a certain solvent).
Retention
time is at the bottom axis of the chromatogram. This is equivalent to
the "approximate molecular weight" or the apparent molecular weight
or the "kilodalton weight" of the Lyme Western Blot antibody bands.
The next graphic
demonstrates how we choose a solvent and system to identify the peaks in
question, and are assured that in the matrix (inert ingredients, or, for
example, the syrup ingredients in child formulation oral antibiotics), there
is only one peak present. We scan across multiple wavelengths to
assure that at one retention time, only one entity is seen across the
wavelengths. This also helps to select a wavelength that will yield a
relatively uniformly shaped peak.
Gel
electrophoresis or Western Blotting is ancient laboratory history. There are
plenty of better methods (more precise, accurate, etc) available to determine
if a person has antibodies against Lyme disease, and if they are SPECIFIC
antibodies. These better methods are not in use because the profiteers want
to sell test kits and not find Lyme or a treatable disease. As far
as healthcare is concerned, Lyme "science" is going in the opposite direction of plain
old regular science. If BigInsurance is taking over medicine as they
have formally claimed, then BigInsurance does not want to detect any diseases until the
person is in a terminal stage, wherein the State can take that person’s property
and Social Security check to pay for their hospice care. The proof that BigInsurance has the stated intent of taking over
American Medicine is in the office
of the “US Attorney,” in New Haven, Connecticut, at the time of this writing.
The managed care formula
is simple math: Don’t treat anyone for anything. When they’re sick enough,
then Medicaid or the State takes over. This formula is also in the interest
of the unions, since the more the uneducated bedpan washers there are (union
members), the better for the
bedpan washers’ union. Everyone charges Uncle Sam. In a state like
Connecticut, where Yale and the Insurance Capitol of the World,
Hartford, reside, we are on the forefront on how to turn humans into hamburger. There
are no rules or regulations. The US Department of Justice does not care about
scientific crime, and the “elected representatives” care even less, since
they’re mostly Democrats- who do the unions’ bidding.
The above graphic shows a
diode array system in which we can pass an analyte through numerous wavelengths to
assure that there is not more than one entity eluting at a certain retention
time or that the system is SPECIFIC or specifically identifies only one
species. We choose a solvent and system to identify the peaks in
question, and are assured that in the matrix, there is only one peak present
at a characteristic Retention time (or kilodalton "weight" in gel
electrophoresis or Lyme Western Blotting). The chromatography columns are
basically molecular sieves and often just some modified sand (silica).
Another way to detect
underlying peaks or in the case of Lyme Western Blotting, antibodies, is to
perform a 2-dimensional Western Blot, or to turn the blot on it's side (90
degrees) and then re-blot. This was demonstrated by
Dattwyler and others.
(The above graphic will be redrawn so as to avoid copyright issues when this
book is finally finished. So far there are 28 chapters but most of
them have already written themselves.)
http://iai.asm.org/cgi/reprint/57/11/3637?view=long&pmid=2807540
In the above graphic where
the researchers tried to see of there were underlying bands or co-eluting
bands, they turned the electrophoretics 90 degrees.
Gel electrophoresis or
Western Blotting is ancient laboratory history. There are plenty of better
methods (more precise, accurate, etc) available to determine if a person has
antibodies against Lyme disease, and if they are SPECIFIC antibodies. These
better methods are not in use because the profiteers want to sell test kits
and not find Lyme or a treatable disease. It is rather strange that the
American Medical Association agreed with Yale that "Lyme is such a serious
disease that we needed a vaccine against it every year," but also that "Lyme
is so not serious a disease, it does not need to be treated." [No one
among the self-alleged mainstream media journalists approaches the American
Medical Association's leadership and asks them about their silence on this
question, and none among the New Media (progressives) asks the journalists
why they're so incompetent either.]
The take-home message is
that each term or each test, should refer to a scientifically valid, discrete,
distinct, quantifiable entity. A thing that is real. If
someone says "OspA is 100% specific to Borrelia burgdorferi,"
that means it is believed to only occur in Borrelia burgdorferi. OspA
antibodies are seen to occur as band 31 or 31 kilodaltons (apparent molecular
weight) in Lyme Western Blotting. In Lyme Western Blotting, each
antibody band is as ACCURATE for diagnosis as its assigned percent
specificity:
E.g.., If a Lyme victim has an
antibody to band 41, and that band is said to be 70% specific to "Lyme
Disease," then the victim has a 70% chance of having "Lyme Disease."
(Band 41 has been made 100% specific by Yale in a true FDA method validation
found in the US patent database as 5,618,533.) If a Lyme victim has an
antibody against OspB, he/she has a 100% chance of having Lyme, since OspB
is about 100% specific to Lyme. It only comes from Lyme spirochetes,
so OspB is 100% specific. (Lyme Western Blotting is such a
slop-o-metric method that when real methods come along, like capillary
electrophoresis, we could be more certain of the retention time or
"apparent" molecular weight of 34 kilodaltons in the case of OspB).
A MedLine search query of "Fikrig and OspA"
yields
53 reports.
One of the earliest reports, a 1992 study of
the efficacy of OspA vaccination in mice:
http://iai.asm.org/cgi/reprint/60/3/773?view=long&pmid=1541551
was an attempt to determine whether or not
OspA vaccination prevented Lyme disease in mice using completely improper
methods, dark field microscopy and histological (looking at tissues under a
microscope) examination for "inflammation." As we shall see in later
chapters, it was already known by 1992 that spirochetes were nerve and brain
tropic, that Borreliosis was a disease also of
"NO INFLAMMATION" when fatally
destructive to human brains, that mice were not the best animal model of the
brain invasion in humans (hamsters are better), that recovering spirochetes
from the spheroplast form in culture
"could take months," and Yale's Erol
Fikrig had a DNA method and an RNA method available to him to truly see
whether or not OspA vaccination prevented "Lyme Disease."
The sum total of what Yale University did
and said as regards "Lyme Disease" did not make any scientific sense,
whatsoever. It was as if no one at Yale University was reading any of
the scientific literature, not even their own previously published reports,
no matter what the topic, no matter what the Department, no matter what the
subject matter.
The authors of this book do not know how
so many Yale University staff members could have been so arrogant as to
go forward blindly and assume they did not have to know anything.
It would seem logical to have researched
all the previous science on Borreliosis available to them. It
would seem obvious that they would look at the success or failure of
previously-tried lipoprotein vaccines, that they would look at what
other researchers were doing and saying and most of all, that they would
take a step back and try to see the whole picture.
We have never seen an example of a Yale
University report where they seemed the least bit interested in
relieving human
suffering.
Here we see yet another group independently
trying to fine-tune a B. burgdorferi-specific flagellin method:
FROM:
http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/reprint/31/3/629?view=long&pmid=8384628
In this next report from 1996, which follows from two previous reports by
Erol Fikrig and Lou Magnarelli, we see further development of the
recombinant flagellin method. Note that they used recombinant OspC
from strain 2591. As we will see in chapter 3 on what Allen Steere did
in Europe, and subsequently, in the LYMErix trial, strain B31 was used to
Western Blot persons who thought they had contracted Lyme disease during the
trial (regardless of vaccination status). Strain B31 has no or low
OspC in it. To this day, Quest labs uses strain B31 to Western Blot
persons for Lyme disease. They're deliberately missing the vast
majority of cases by doing so (on top of the ELISA method also missing the
vast majority of cases). OspC is associated with brain invasion.
FROM:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=228775&blobtype=pdf
The "Validation" of the
"Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire" which was used in the determination of
health status of Lyme victims by Mark Klempner (BU junior provost) was not a
validation because it detected two different entities- Lyme and Fibromyalgia.
A validation must not detect 2 or more separate entities- it has to have
specificity.
Fibromyalgia is not a
scientifically valid disease because no scientifically valid tests have been
developed to determine if persons who have FM complaints have an actual
detectable illness process going on. The term itself, Fibromyalgia, is
not scientifically defined.
On purpose.
An "impact questionnaire" is
not a scientifically valid test.
That's why it is used to
abuse FM and similar victims.
Psychiatrists never perform
any scientifically valid tests for anything, much less any of their DSM IV
declarations, which is why psychiatrists are deployed against these victims of
chronic fatiguing illnesses. These "vague" illnesses terms or
signs or complaints are vague because they
are never analyzed with any scientifically valid tests, if a psychiatrist is
deployed against the complainer. Therefore, from the psychiatry
perspective, all symptoms are vague if they exist only as described by the
victim with their mouths. This is why sick people are routinely sent to
psychiatrists by managed care or the managed care drones, such as the likes of
what New York Medical College, now controlled by Kaiser-Permanente, churns out
at a discount (tuition reimbursement is given if the drone signs on to the Kaiser
machine).
It is a managed care
protocol to not record any real symptoms or run any real tests on persons
complaining of chronic fatiguing illness, especially if they are female,
since there is then no real record, no tests, and no malpractice lawsuit.
If an MD determines ahead of time he does not want to deal with a patient,
all he has to do is refer them to a psychiatrist and not run any tests.
His rear-end is covered, if there are no real records and no tests have been run.
If these victims of bogus
hypochondria labels were subjected to the rigorous classes of testing such as
radioimaging, cytokine dysregulation assays, antibody profiles, true microbial
panels (not what happens in Lymeland), markers of central nervous system
disease, such as gliosis, or the production of brain toxins associated with
the immune response to infections (quinolinic acid), etc., then this entire
class of double victims- victims of the Lyme crimes and psychiatry, the
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, the Gulf War Illness Vets, and Fibromyalgia victims,
...
...if these victims of
psychiatric quacks, who never use any scientifically validated tests for validated
illness markers - entities for which the range of NORMAL has been exceeded by
the sick person - were to be finally scientifically worked up with
scientifically valid testing, it's likely a real disease process will be
discovered.
One cannot use terms like
"anxious" or "depressed," to assess any human complaining of chronic fatiguing
illness since those are terms which could, instead, mean that the facial and physical expression
of the-person-not-being-believed-by-these-psychiatric-sex-perverts is
that of,
"Are you CRAZY? Why in the world would I INVENT
that I can't live my life any more and persist in insisting that I AM
sick, you FOOL!!" It could be a refection of the
abuse.
But such an expression or
body-language signs means the sick person is "anxious" and not ill
(and furious at the offense of not being believed), according
to these highly paid whores of managed care who always blame the victim and
never record or even detect anything that might resemble a virture, such as
activism or being honest. There is nothing in the DSM-IV that
resembles a protocol for the detection and recording of admirable human
behaviors. Such is not even considered.
================================
YOU ARE ON YOUR OWN AS FAR AS MEDICINE IN AMERICA:
Also, plain old regular humans (for
all intents and purposes, forget MDs; everyone is on their own as regards
medicine) need to - MUST -
realize that "anxious" and "depressed," could have a real medical cause, like
cytokine dysregulation (stuff that causes fever, inflammatory responses, hypercoagulation, degradants that could compete for and act as
neurotransmitters), or a thyroid problem, etc., but most importantly, that such terms
as "anxious" or "depressed" are "opinions," not facts. A person would
obviously be very anxious and
depressed if they are very sick and don't know where to go or who to call or
what to do for relief. In other words, just
because one person says another is anxious, does not mean there is not a
valid reason for the anxiety- meaning the anxiety is not pathological. This is the common
sense lacking in all of psychiatry. The average human needs to throw
out psychiatry since it is simply an abuse system that is responsible for
the destruction of the Catholic Church and other members of the clergy,
since psychiatry gave the Western world the apologetics that "all sexual
tendencies were normal," when all along they were considered depravity
outside marriage.
"Anxiety" could be in response to a
real abuse situation, such as being called a liar. "Anxiety" could be
what a person looks like who is just plain sick and very uncomfortable.
Such instances of "anxiety" are not pathological. Rather, the disbeliever himself is being
psychiatrically pathological or psychopathological or evil, or whatever you
want to call a person who presupposes they have the magical ability to
determine that a sick person is not-sick-but-a-liar without performing the
scientifically valid scientific medical tests. For a
person to presuppose he/she has magical powers and can know without physical
means, that another person is not suffering, is formally defined as
"psychotic."
Such abuse of Lyme victims is so readily
available to the Lyme criminals because it is the standard
"medicine" of Psychiatry's Blame the Victimology. Soon this
will no longer be an option for BigInsurance and the patent profiteers
because psychiatry will be gone- off to join leeches in the dustbin of
medical history.
Performing scientifically
valid tests is meant to get rid of opinions. Science itself is meant to
get rid of opinions.
It seems strange that
psychiatrists can't figure out that by starting out believing
that what a sick person claims are his/her illness signs really are their
illness signs, that that would have the placebo effect of validating a
person's illness. It clearly would upset anyone to be told they're not
sick, when they are.
It seems strange that psychiatrists would not have
wanted to assist people with Chronic Lyme disease, since it's a brain disease
and Lyme was their last chance to maintain a place at the table of real
medicine. In the abusive remarks from psychiatry that we have witnessed since
we'd exposed these "Lyme is a brain disease" crimes, we hear the ringtones
of anger, jealousy, and fear:
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;162(3):433-40. Related Articles, Links
Toward a philosophical structure for psychiatry.
Kendler KS.
Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia
Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. kend...@hsc.vcu.edu
This article, which seeks to sketch
a coherent conceptual and
philosophical framework for psychiatry, confronts two major questions:
how do mind and brain interrelate, and how can we integrate the
multiple explanatory perspectives of psychiatric illness? Eight
propositions are proposed and defended: 1) psychiatry is irrevocably
grounded in mental, first-person experiences; 2) Cartesian substance
dualism is false; 3) epiphenomenalism is false; 4) both brain-->mind
and mind-->brain causality are real; 5) psychiatric disorders are
etiologically complex, and ***
no
more "spirochete-like"
discoveries
will be
made*** that explain their origins in simple terms; 6)
explanatory pluralism is preferable to monistic explanatory approaches,
especially biological reductionism; 7) psychiatry must move beyond a
prescientific "battle of paradigms" to embrace complexity and support
empirically rigorous and pluralistic explanatory models; 8) psychiatry
should strive for "patchy reductionism" with the goal of "piecemeal
integration" in trying to explain complex etiological pathways to
illness bit by bit.
PMID: 15741457 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
We will find in later chapters that this
first premise is wrong and that that's what's wrong with psychiatry- this is
the ERROR: "psychiatry is
irrevocably grounded in mental, first-person experiences;"
How can the source of a true paranoid
delusion be discovered if the first premise in psychiatry is
that selfishness or self-centeredness or ego is okay or normal?
"Evil spirit, in the name of Jesus, announce the trap in which you caught
Richard/Rita. I ask this by the authority of the Church, and in the name
of Jesus."
"We start with self-growth
[psychoanalysis], self discovery. We tell em, we told Rita, First,
you must be yourself, find yourself, know who you are. They stick their
noses in their navel and say: I like my own smell!!"
-
a conversation with Satan in
Hostage to the Devil-
Malachi Martin [Read (almost) the whole book
online]
Transposing Love with Sex.
Anything to disfigure beauty.
Transposing the ascension of man from total selflessness to total
self-worship.
Twisting life's negative outcomes; victims of evil/hatred (such as Lyme
abuse or
child abuse) to be the victim's' fault;
sowing discord instead of allowing justice.
That is what psychiatry is all about.
Psychiatrists are a lot like lawyers, as
we will see in later chapters.
I don't see in the above abstract the
notion of
"validating a person's traumas," either, do you? The non-validation of
evil, by psychiatry's very construct of blaming (diagnosing) the victims of
evil, is seen in their abuse of Fibromyalgia, Gulf War and similar victims.
Psychiatry is a debasement of everything: 1) they never perform any
scientifically valid tests for anything, ever, 2) they never even speak or
write of illness of of suffering, nor do they have any compassion (it is as
if illness or suffering does not exist, since it is not considered normal
and real illness signs and behaviors are not listed in the DSM- as if
psychiatry is completely unfamiliar with medical illness), 3)
psychiatry has erroneously framed the nature of a human (maturity is about
self-effacement and volunteering; community involvement); not all people are
ego centric and not all people think of themselves first, so psychoanalysis
should not apply and should not put self-centeredness concepts where they
had never resided before, 4) psychiatry has it backwards on
"placebo-effects," because if they had it right, they would agree in the
beginning that a person is sick if they say they are, and then return them
to the medical field where they belong (this, we know intuitively would make
a person feel better).
No one who is self-centered is happy,
yet this is what psychiatry teaches us we should obsess over.
There does not happen to be a single
thing about humans or reality that psychiatry has captured correctly.
Avoid psychiatry and psychology.
No one can force you to visit a non-medical MD for any kind of evaluation.
If you have been put in this position, send the "evaluator" a questionaire
to test their ability to decipher medical jargon and perform scientifically
valid tests. Send the same questionaire you prepare for the
psychiatric hair-baller to the State
Medical Board and announce that you will not be placed in the presence of
someone not qualified to understand modern medicine. State that you
"want all the tests performed on yourself that have been worked up and
developed by the 180s (Chapter 10)," since in your mind, "scientific testing
is preferable to crystal ball gazing, or listening to the hairball, or
reading the tealeaves."
Mark Twain's Jim listens to the hairball, in
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.
State that you "did not spend your tax
dollars on the development of these scientifically valid tests only to be
sent to a tea leaf reader" because your "insurance company happens to
understand the 'scientific' value of the Crystal Ball Brigade." Send a
copy to your state Insurance Commissioner, the Department of Justice, the UN
Human Rights Commission, the European Commission, the World Trade
Organization, and fax it to the embassies of all the major foreign nations
and tell them to watch how America
treats its sick people...
=====================================
Lyme Western
Blotting vs. the use of recombinant specific proteins:
In 1991, since it was
well-known at that time that the vast majority of people with Lyme
Borreliosis or any of the relapsing fevers have antibody
bands 41 (against he internal flagellin) and that band 41 was the
first antibody to show up in a Borreliosis patients, several entities
pursued enhancing this antibody for a test.
Search the National
Library of Medicine for Borrelia and Flagellin from January 1,
1975 to December 31, 1991, the year Yale developed their borrelia-specific
flagellin method.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/
You will find the
search results
well-worth reading since they all allude to the fact that many groups were
looking at
enhancing flagellin as an antibody test in the late 1980s and early 1990s. At least three groups were
wanting to elicit the DNA-encoded
structure of flagellin for use as an amplifier or a way to increase the
sensitivity of a test, or to make the test more easily detect the cases
where the antibody to flagellin is low in concentration. The FDA
Bioanalytical Methods Validations parameter of this "enhancing flagellin,
since that's the first antibody and the most frequent antibody in all Lyme
cases" endeavor is Limit of Detection.
When we are talking about increasing or improving the system's performance
by increasing the sensitivity of the test, we are talking about
lowing the Limit of Detection or the Limit of Quantitation so
we can detect smaller and smaller quantities of the analyte in question from
the mix.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi5,618,533
Yale's Flagellin (band 41) patent, 5,618,533 clearly states that this method is accurate and specific:
"An unexpected advantage of the flagellin polypeptides of this invention is their high sensitivity. They are capable of detecting B. burgdorferi-specific antibodies in ***the vast majority*** of confirmed seropositive samples tested. Another advantage of the flagellin polypeptides of this invention is their high level of ***specificity*** --a minimal number of false positives due to a very low level of cross-reactivity with antibodies directed against treponemes and other bacteria."
Here is the original 1991 Fikrig/Flavell report that goes with the
USPTO.gov # 5,618,533 patent:
http://iai.asm.org/cgi/reprint/59/10/3531?view=long&pmid=1894359
Look at the graphic on page 3533.
Yale's Fikrig and Flavell are clearly selecting out a section of flagellar DNA that does not cross react with antibodies against flagella from other organisms, which means it is a SPECIFIC test for Borrelia burgdorferi flagellin antibodies, which almost all Lyme victims have.
Why wasn't this test used to assess the outcome of Yale's other, later, patent, the LYMErix vaccine?
Even CDC "officer" Alan Barbour in US patent 5,436,000 proposed such a concept when he patented the flagellar-less spirochete:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/5,436,000
"In addition to the reduced potential for elicitation of undesirable autoimmune responses and the ability to be administered as live attenuated vaccines, the novel vaccines possess the additional advantage of facilitating diagnosis of Borreliosis in individuals, mammals, and birds who have been administered the vaccine. As those of skill in the art will recognize, few if any vaccines are one hundred percent efficacious and vaccine failures do occur. Furthermore, when the disease vaccinated against is a disease which, like Lyme disease, elicits symptoms that can be attributed to a number of other pathologic conditions, specific immunodiagnostic assays may be complicated by antibodies elicited against the vaccine.
In contrast, when the flagella-less microorganisms of the present invention are used for immunization, one can simply assay an individual exhibiting symptoms characteristic of a selected borrelial pathogenesis, such as Lyme disease, for antibodies to the flagellar-antigen. In such individuals, the absence of such antibodies will usually weigh against a diagnosis of Borreliosis, and their presence will be suggestive of a vaccine failure."
CDC officer Alan Barbour is saying to vaccinate with a flagellar-less spirochete, but then test for vaccine failure using a Borreliosis-specific recombinant flagellar antigen because we don't want to vaccinate with flagellin, since that causes an autoimmune neurologic disease.
But, according to the Yale Lyme 180s, "No one can HAVE an antibody to flagellin (band 41) and be sick," just like, at the present time, the crooks say, "No one can have band 31 (OspA) and be diagnosed with "Lyme Disease," despite that being the LYMErix vaccine.
Very funny.
They went with an OspA vaccine because they thought band 41 would be a bad idea to give someone because it causes neurologic disease
(and also ineffective as a vaccine since flagellin are internal or are not
seen by antibodies), but about people who already have band 41 from Lyme infection, these crooks say,
"YOU'RE *INSANE* TO BE SAYING YOU HAVE A NEUROLOGIC DISEASE!!"
Yale's Eugene Shapiro even perjured himself and said he "never saw a case of neurologic Lyme Disease in children..."
completely confident that no one understands that "Lyme Disease" is now the knee-only disease caused by OspA (caused
by LYMErix; SmithKline was sued over this by Attorney Steven Sheller of
www.sheller.com ).
This FRAUD in testing committed by Allen
Steere in Europe (CHAPTER
3) leaves OspA and B out of the diagnostic standard, such
that after LYMErix was approved, the RICO cabal (Corixa, Imugen, and L2 Diagnostics) could claim that theirs were the only labs qualified to test for Lyme Disease after LYMErix vaccination
(which is known as a "monopoly" or antitrust).
By not using the Yale flagellin method, they are allowing people to progress to late neurologic disease and death:
http://www.actionlyme.org/ALSLYME47.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAIN_PERMANENT.htm
There were two reports by Allen Steere and Louis Magnarelli of the
Connecticut Agricultural Station, where they state that if a person has only
band 41 (anti-flagellar antibody), and don't have severe periodontal disease
or syphilis, they may be diagnosed with "Lyme Disease."
1986 (Allen Steere)
http://www.jci.org/articles/view/112683/pdf
1992 (Lou Magnarelli)
http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/reprint/30/12/3158?view=long&pmid=1280650
There is no disputing the claim that these Yale 180s are murderers, since this is clearly their own data and it shows that they know what the rules are for developing an accurate test for all cases of Lyme, especially the earliest cases, since the first antibody to show up is band 41 or flagellin.
They, Yale, clearly tried to make band 41 SPECIFIC - an FDA Bioanalytical
Methods Validations criterion/requirement - showing that they understand the
logic.
As an analytical chemist, I had first described the exact crime of changing the diagnostic standard for "Lyme Disease"
to falsify the LYMErix results and create a national monopoly on testing, patents, and grants,
to the Food and Drug Administration, Vaccine Committee on January 31, 2001 (CHAPTER
4).