|
14 Feb 2012
HOME
Pharma/CDC on Brain
damage from vaccines, Fauci, Phages, Bioweapons manufacture
HHS.gov is
Incompetent; BMJ calls fraud "crime.")
Official: CFIDS and MS-Lyme are the
same disease; Epstein-Barr
CDC Greed
(won't answer the FOIA)
ELISA = arbitrary cutoff.
Disclaimer
Overview
TUSKEGEE - By Jerry Leonard
1998, CIA Oilmen & Israelis plan to overthrow
Saddam for the oil.
Bush/Gore Oil/War-(Oct,2000)
Bush's own explainer (Oct
2000):
Iraq Oil
Iraq was an oil-theft war.
| |
Required reading- Chapter 3 on
Dearborn and what Allen Steere did in Europe.
CHAPTER 4 - The January 2001 FDA
Hearing on LYMErix Adverse Events
This is data
the Lyme crooks (Yale/NYMC/ALDF/IDSA/Kaiser
cabal) refused to turn over to the Connecticut Attorney General for a
year and a half before settling
out of court.
The Lyme criminals could not even read their Western Blots in
LYMErix or ImmuLyme-vaccinated people, yet they claimed to have used the
Dearborn Method to assess their vaccines outcomes:
Here are those 4
"we can't read our OspA vaccine results" reports:
1) SCHOEN and PERSING, with JOHN ANDERSON,1996
- the RICO report:
http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/reprint/35/1/233?view=long&pmid=8968914
2) SCHOEN AND PERSING IN THEIR 1996
RICO METHOD PATENT:
The Dave Persing, Mayo Clinic FRAUD Patent-6,045,804
3) PERSING WITH SIGAL EXPLAINING THAT THE WESTERN BLOTS WERE
UNREADABLE, 2000:
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/313920
4) Yale's
ROBERT SCHOEN in the 1998
Munchausen's Book,
instructing MDs to blow off LYMErix systemically
injured people ("but send the post-vaccination blood to the Yale L2
Diagnostics RICO lab if you must bother to be a
physician").
This ▲ is a FALSE CLAIM or a
QUI TAM or FRAUD on the GOVERNMENT:
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00921.htm
They, Yale, Schoen, knew they could not read their Western Blots in
LYMErix-vaccinated people, but they wanted all the national bloodwork
sent to their labs (L2 Diagnostics and
PolyGenomics), so they could patent, and pharm, and be the only ones
with access to the new vector borne diseases to patent, and be the only
ones with access to - nationally - genetic information about disease
susceptibilities (this has bioweapons applications).
The reason we can't have this, is because Yale is too stupid to be
managing diseases and disease susceptibilities, because they missed out
on the real reason Pam3Cys or LYMErix, or HIV vaccines did not work, or
why Lyme was the New Great Imitator-
IMMUNE SUPPRESSION due to
tolerization to fungal antigens.
Yale employees were never smart enough to be in charge
of such data.
The 1998 Vaccines Reports (ImmuLyme and LYMErix):
LYMErix results (76% "safe and effective"):
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/209
ImmuLyme results (92% "safe and effective"):
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/216
From the LYMErix trial, "categories of
outcomes:"
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content-nw/full/339/4/209/T1
The essence of
the crime: LYMErix was bogus because the testing for Lyme is bogus and
you can't use a test that does not detect Lyme to assess whether a vaccine
prevented it. This is
what I told the FDA--on the FDA's website.
In the spring and summer of 1999, after LYMErix was approved by the FDA
(December, 1998), I began getting calls from people who were sick with Lyme
disease and wanted a referral. Some told a story where they had gotten
sick with Lyme again from the vaccine and others did not at first associate
the vaccine with the induction with the Lyme-like illness. They all
knew it was "Lyme" since they had had it before but had gotten better from
antibiotic treatment (only about a third of all Lyme victims go on to the
chronic stage). Since there were 8-10 of them, I thought that was a
pattern. Karen Forschner of the Lyme Disease Foundation was
advertising LYMErix on their Lyme.org website and were being criticized on
the Lyme newsgroup for this. I drove to Hartford to see Karen and
asked why she was advertising LYMErix when it was causing so many problems.
She did not know about the problems and told me I had to get these adverse
events (AEs) reported!
As I did not know how to get these adverse events reported, I called Dr.
Dennis Parenti at SmithKline to question him about the matter. Parenti
gave me instructions about the VAERS or FDA's Vaccine Adverse Events
Reporting System online and with online forms which could be printed out.
ActionLyme started a national campaign to get all adverse events reported to
the FDA. A year later (2000, fall), the FDA had received around a
thousand reports through the VAERS and granted us a hearing. It was
scheduled for January 31, 2001. By the time of the meeting there were
around 1100 AEs reported.
From among the online groups, and with questioning personally many of
these double victims, I had acquired the notion that there were different
types of adverse events. I asked about any other positive bands
besides 31 (the vaccine). Almost all of the had other bands.
This led me to believe that LYMErix was activating latent Lyme. We had
as many as could, sign up with the FDA (Nancy Cherry) to be heard at the
public hearing.
The FDA did nothing about
our complaints heard at the January 31. 2001 Hearing on LYMErix until
Karen Forschner of the www.lyme.org found
a Tufts patent describing OspA as a
superantigen. But
the real deal was the immune suppression outcomes of LYMErix (Chp
16 on fungal vaccines), since Lyme is not really a bad-knee. Those
knee-disease cases are the rarest cases. Lyme is not typically "an
inflammatory disease," but rather the new Great Imitator, imitating or
producing outcomes that could clinically be diagnosed as ALS, MS, chronic
fatigue syndrome and Fibromyalgia, the latter two of which are fake diseases
that are Lyme- and LYMErix-like and for which no scientifically valid tests
are run. These are mostly diseases (keyword "syndromes") that women
suffer and men are always looking for excuses to believe women are obsessed
with their, um, extra member. That alleged obsession with male members is
alleged to be what is causing women to falsely claim illness signs.
Again, because Lyme is an immune suppressing disease caused by shedding
antigen (blebbing) to which most people become tolerized (whereas the
Steere-Knee-HLA people continue to have the opposite allergy response) and
thence incompetent to similar antigens from different infecting organisms
(and also suffer changes to lymphocytes, etc., as will be seen in later
chapters on the real pathologies produced by this disease, Relapsing Fever),
not only will they end up testing negative to the Dearborn criteria, a huge
insult/injection of this same at-first hyperimmunostimulatory but later
immune suppressing antigen, LYMErix, is bound to produce the same terrible
effects as the disease itself.
It's not as though
LYMErix actually gives people the infection,
it just gives them the
worst part of the disease process itself. LYMErix vaccination is like
a mimic of 75 bahzillion spirochetes all this shedding this very toxic
antigen (could be considered an endotoxin) at once in a single human.
It would seem that these criminals would have looked at the sum total of all
their own reports on the pathologies known to be associated with Relapsing
Fever and given pause to their intention of going ahead with a vaccine that
especially Allen Steere said was the cause of his version of the disease.
Allen Steere has many hypotheticals about what is the cause of his version
of autoimmune-knee, but one of the later ones is that OspA gene code has a
mimic somewhere in the body that the T cells go after because his
particular HLA- T cells mistake human tissue for OspA.
Others are "superantigen," "cross reacting antibodies," or "toxic, free or
bound immune complexes." Whatever are Steere's 4 hypotheses as to what
are the mechanisms of autoimmunity-only, his hypotheses are
"autoimmune-only" and never persisting infection needing expensive, long
term or repeated treatment. That itself should be a clue as to who Steere is
working for: BigInsurance, grants from arthritis groups, grants from NIAID
(when Lyme belongs to either parasitic tropical diseases or neurology or
both), and possibly whoever among the CDC bioweaponeers who might want the
"stealth neurologic disabler" aspect of Borreliosis to remain a secret.
If the arthritis patients groups had a brain cell among them, they would
request an investigation of Steere, such that they might find arthritis has
a bacterial cause (it does often- mycoplasmas and others) for which
antibiotics offer the best, the quickest, and the least damaging relief.
Not only is LYMErix supposedly the cause of the "disease,
there is the question of whether or not the
vaccine "mixture was properly micellized,
since the blots looked like OspA molecules could have globbed together in
the vial before being injected into humans. (Actual LYMErix-Smudge-Blots
are on the HOW RICO WILL BE CHARGED
page.) OspA is a sticky molecule that also sticks to itself.
Spirochetes have even been observed in vitro sticking to each other,
presumably due to these sticky Osps.
This theory that the blot-smudging in LYMErix and ImmuLyme vaccinated people
was due to the fact that single, free, OspA molecules were actually
impossible to inject into people was later proven by the
Korean chemists who blew up (Mass Spec)
the gp120 and gp41 glycolipids in the HIV virus. "these molecules...
tendency to aggregate."
Note: No males reported these crimes to the FDA, and in particular,
no male MDs did, speaking to the soundness of the theory that
male-self-and-self-penile obsession (arrogance) is the source of their
inherent, native male stupidity.
My revealing the entire crime to the FDA Vaccine Committee made Edward McSweegan, present for the
meeting, go ballistic:
NIH's Edward McSweegan's Near-SPONTANEOUS
COMBUSTION-Experience
So, not only do we never hear anything out of the AMA which demonstrates
their slightest inclination to investigate the RICO and scientific fraud
crime of "Lyme Disease and LYMErix," they say nothing about the chronic
harassment of very sick Lyme victims and their treaters.
That's how much we women love penises.
The male-member is clearly associated with intellectual and moral
incompetence no matter how you look at it.
From the LYMErix trial:
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content-nw/full/339/4/209/T1

As you can see, the victims were required to have the scientifically
invalid Steere version of Lyme Disease via Western blotting. (No one agreed
with Steere at Dearborn by a long shot.)
Later we learned they could not even read these Western Blot, so it looks
like they all would be "Unconfirmed Lyme."
The results were (and this is in the public domain because it was given in
multiple copies to the FDA Vaccine Committee members on January 31, 2001, by
myself to go along with my slide presentation):

You can see the shift of sick people into the "Unconfirmed Lyme"
category, so we said, in 1999, after hearing about all the LYMErix injurees, Okay, What was the testing
for Lyme like?
That's when we (the Lyme Disease Foundation,
www.lyme.org ; Karen and Tom Forschner and
myself) ordered the CDC's Dearborn booklet and found the testing schema was a hoax
and would only detect about 15% of all cases.
Later, still, we found out they could not even read their Western Blots in
LYMErix or ImmuLyme-vaccinated people:
Here are those 4 reports:
1) SCHOEN and PERSING, with JOHN ANDERSON,1996:
http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/reprint/35/1/233?view=long&pmid=8968914
2) SCHOEN AND PERSING IN THEIR 1996 RICO METHOD PATENT:
The Dave Persing, Mayo Clinic FRAUD Patent-6,045,804
3) PERSING WITH SIGAL EXPLAINING THAT THE WESTERN BLOTS WERE
UNREADABLE, 2000:
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/313920
4) Yale's
ROBERT SCHOEN in the 1998
Munchausen's Book,
instructing MDs to blow off LYMErix systemically
injured people.
So, I told the FDA what happened at Dearborn and I told them what was the
previous blood-testing standard for Lyme Disease,
which was Steere's 19986 standard (Chp. 3) and the CDC's earlier,
1990, standard, which was to look for
changing and expanding IgM bands via
Western Blot, as explained in the previous chapter.
If you look at the totals down the columns,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vaccine |
Placebo |
|
|
|
Definite Lyme |
22 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possible Lyme |
44 |
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconfirmed Lyme |
515 |
468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571 |
567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm. In the first year, more people got sick with "NO-LYME/LYME"
in the VACCINE GROUP.
Let's suppose those 571 people dropped out after the first year of two
vaccinations (SmithKline and Yale do not reveal what happened to these
people in their report, but certainly 339 is less than 515, so it looks like
they dropped out of the trial). If people were going to become
sick, it appeared to take two injections to finish them off, and then they
quit the trial (logically) and did not take the injection the second year ??
We don't know because SmithKline did not report the percentage of people who
after the first 2 injections, had this mysterious "Unconfirmed Lyme" - which
we will in later chapters discover is the same immune-suppression disease as
chronic Lyme - hung around for a third round of this OspA criminal abuse.
In the second year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vaccine |
Placebo |
|
|
|
Definite Lyme |
16 |
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possible Lyme |
35 |
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconfirmed Lyme |
339 |
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would say they had no data. If you notice,
the people who became ill
after 2 injections (in the first year), seem to have joined the SICK
group (otherwise, wouldn't the 2 years' worth of outcomes be summed?).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vaccine |
Placebo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1 |
Unconfirmed Lyme |
515 |
468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 2 |
Unconfirmed Lyme |
339 |
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854 |
794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm. More people had this mysterious "Unconfirmed Lyme" in the
vaccine group.
There
is no data in the report about how many of the vaccine-injured after two
injections dropped out, but if they all dropped out, SmithKline should have
looked at why (this is what I also told the FDA Vaccine Committee). Because the "possible Lyme" group had some "seroconversion,"
we now wonder what they could mean, since vaccination rendered the blots
unreadable. It was thought at the time by myself, that LYMErix activated
latent infections, because the LYMErix victims I knew all had some other
bands besides OspA (band 31) after vaccination in addition to complaining
that they "had Lyme again."
My perception at the present time (2007-2008) is that this was just a totally bogus report and they just juggled
ideas and numbers and "categories of disease" concepts around until they got a result they liked.
They admitted 4 times that they could not read their Western Blots in either
the ImmuLyme or the LYMErix trials, so we wonder what they mean by "later
seroconversion?"
If they say there
is a group called "possible Lyme" with bands, but later reported that their
blots were unreadable (and they said that in 1996; Schoen and Persing), then
we wonder what the blots looked like of the "Unconfirmed Lyme" group?
If they could not read their blots, they had no data no matter how you
look at it. If after two years, more people were sick among the
Vaccine group, we wonder how in the world they could say they prevented any
disease.
All that we knew at that time from reported and independent empirical
evidence is that 1) people became ill from this vaccine, 2) that it was a
Lyme-like illness from the vaccine and that 3) the victims were discredited
when they tried to report these adverse events to the Yale vaccine
administration team of "physicians" 4) in the same manner that all chronic Lyme victims are discredited.
Naturally, we thought that since these LYMErix victims were so mistreated
by the cabal, they must be telling the truth. They must "have Lyme
again." THEY would know!!
There were NO ASYMPTOMATIC LYME cases in the vaccine group. To us
that was the biggest clue. Instead of "LYMErix prevents symptomatic
Lyme" as SmithKline claimed, it instead appeared that "LYMErix made
asymptomatic cases symptomatic." That's also what we observed
empirically and what is known about Lyme becoming latent or "going into
remission" and not ever cured.
The essence of this scam is that Yale and SmithKline really did not care
about the victims of either LYMErix or Lyme Disease. Once SmithKline
was threatened by the FDA to either remove LYMErix from the market or have
the FDA pull it for them, SmithKline voluntarily removed it, but they made the
public assertion that it was removed due to "poor sales."
The poor sales were
due to LYMErix and the Lyme criminals' terrible reputations.
People know right from wrong. Especially those who
graduate medical school. These crimes were not oversight and not
carelessness. They were committed out of greed and the Lyme criminals' indisputable
hatred for humanity.
We claim that the science says a Pandora's Box of
immune-suppression-related results are the outcomes of long term Lyme
infection. The adverse events were all over the place. All
kinds. We claim that LYMErix seemed to have brought out outcomes
like Lyme itself. The blots were unreadable due to the smudging and
the likelihood that free OspA molecules did not remain free in the vial.
It would have made sense to have found out what OspA actually did, rather
than state that "no one knows what it does" (CDC officer Alan Barbour-
owner of the ImmuLyme OspA patent and approved of the Dearborn standard,
naturally to promote the false positive outcome of his patented product), while hyperventilating over the
money they thought they'd make and the monopoly on all vector borne disease
funding and testing... and insanely ramming this thing onto the market
destroying people in their way and in their wake. It would have made
more sense just to slow down and think about what they were doing.
Because of the kinds of people these Lyme criminals are - true Mafioso-type
thugs - who harassed Lyme victims (John Nowkowski, Durland Fish, Edward
McSweegan, UConn's Larry Zemel and Henry Feder), they never should have gone
into the healthcare field, and perhaps they'll serve as a lesson. Perhaps
we need personality disorder screening as part of medical schools'
admissions criteria.
We know that people were
deliberately blown off when they tried to
report adverse events
and due to these same characters' previous abuse of Lyme victims, activists
and their treaters. Because they had a reputation for being such liars,
we believe the
victims whose adverse events were not reported to the FDA until this
later public hearing in January, 2001 rather than any bullshit report by
Yale and SmithKline.
According to the crooks (and this is now well-known, due to the AG
Blumenthal lawsuit and
due to Klempner's infamous, uncompleted, Arbitrary Standard of Care study), nobody
EVER has
"Lyme Disease."
If no one ever has Lyme Disease - by Allen Steere's design in Europe - then
1) LYMErix would not be a failure and
there 2) would be no one
for whom expensive antibiotics should be given.
VOILA!!
We know for sure these LYMErix conclusions can be thrown out because Dearborn was
scientifically
invalid, in addition to the non-readable Western Blot business, reported
well-after LYMErix was on the market (2000), and even before, in 1996, by
Schoen and Persing in their RICO report and RICO patent. This is what I told the FDA.
(on the FDA's website):

Because we pay beaucoup bucks to FDA staff no one there did their jobs.
That happens to be the very definition of "civil servant."
The FDA later formally
disclaimed their obligation to look at the data BigPharma sends them.
Upon a very close look at what happened at Dearborn, we learned that this
crazy
criteria - especially when you can't have band 31 and have a case of Lyme
Disease,
[remember now, you have to have 5 out of 10 bands, but if one of the five is
either band
31 (OspA- the vaccine) or OspB (band 34, its twin)], you are not allowed to
count those
bands as a positive test.
In other words, if you had 6 bands, and two of them were OspA and B,
you would not
be allowed to have a case of "Lyme Disease," even though OspA was specific
enough, allegedly
to prevent Lyme Disease. You could have been a genuine Steere
Elephant, and still not be allowed to have "Lyme Disease."
Since there were about a thousand people who filed VAERS reports to the
FDA as a result of our
campaign (Fall 1999 through Fall 2000), and an additional
100 more, by the time of the
FDA Hearing
(Jan, 31, 2001), not to mention 2 class actions against SmithKline, there were quite a
few people
who were sick from the vaccine, immediately.
How could that be?
It was a fiasco that continues, as long as the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, and
the USDOJ continue to
refuse to do their jobs and prosecute these bastards for all of their
crimes. That they could not even read their Western Blots is
all the proof anyone needs that Yale committed
scientific FRAUD- a false claim to the United States about the testing for Lyme
and the outcome of LYMErix.
Included in my 30 page submission to all the
FDA Vaccine Committee members on January 31, 2001, is the Dressler/Steere Dearborn report which is
the basis of the current bogus IgG testing for Lyme.
The first 11 pages (I made the .pdf on the FDA's website a .jpg are
here:
CHP_4_DICKSON_LYMERIX.htm
PAGE 12 (not uploaded to their website, by the FDA)- the fake invitation to the fake Dearborn Conference:

PAGE 2 of the FAKE DEARBORN CONFERENCE, CONFERENCE BOOKLET:

PAGE 3 of the FAKE DEARBORN, FAKE CONFERENCE BOOKLET

PAGE 4 of the FAKE DEARBORN FAKE CONFERENCE BOOKLET:

PAGE 5 OF THE FAKE DEARBORN BOOKLET:

A VICTIM OF LYMERIX, LAUGHED OUT OF THE OFFICE OF VIJAY SIKAND, EAST LYME,
CORRUPTICUT:

This is a "bogus article." Note that Steere went to Germany to
determine what would be the testing for Lyme in the US.





Here is the bogus part about high concentration (ROC area) equaling greater accuracy.
It does not. This is where Steere claims that high antibody
concentration associated with Lyme arthritis is a validation of the method, when
we know the specificity of each antibody is the accuracy of the test in a human.
If a person has OspA antibody, they have a 100% chance of having Lyme, and the
goal in Methods Development and Validations is to validate a method that detects
the LOWEST concentration of something, reliably.
These idiots say this Lyme test is "sensitive" when obviously is does not
detect LOW concentrations of antibody, if the area of the darkened (absorbance)
means MORE AREA EQUALS MORE (higher) CONCENTRATION OF ANTIBODY. This
Dressler/Steere article is the exact opposite of the truth! This is a
bogus validation and "a bogus article."




continued on
CHP_4_B_DICKSON_LYMERIX.htm
=============================================================
As we Lyme warriors cannot engage any earthly assistance;
As the entire US medical community chooses not to assist sick and
abused people and put a stop to this;
As there is not one MD or group in the entire USA who will take these
criminals to court;
As there is not one lawyer or Department of Justice official who will do the job
they were hired to do and protect us from corporate crime;
As there are no men left among us:
http://www.ourladyswarriors.org/prayer/michael.htm
Saint Michael the Archangel,
defend us in battle.
Be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the devil.
May God rebuke him, we humbly pray;
and do Thou, O Prince of the Heavenly Host -
by the Divine Power of God -
cast into hell, satan and all the evil spirits,
who roam throughout the world seeking the ruin of souls.
Amen. |