1) Yale, et
al, Falsifying the Diagnostic
Standard for "Lyme Disease" in order to:
a) Falsify the Outcome of
LYMErix (false claim
to the FDA),
b) Deny Chronic, Persisting
Borrelia, or Chronic Neurologic Lyme and the
New Great Imitators on behalf
of Kaiser-Permanente at New York Medical College/ALDF.com (the
RICO or the racket is the agreement between insurance companies and
the patent holders to deny the existence of a disease until the
vaccine is ready)
c) Set up the
Monopoly on
Blood (diseases and genetic susceptibilities to them) See
CORIXARICO.htm and
d) Deny that OspA actually Caused the New Great Imitators or
Causes the Yuppie AIDS.
2) Deploying
PsychiaHoes instead of IDSA's Scientifically Valid
Biomarkers (research fraud or false
claims) (This shows intent to cause harm.)
3) Mark Klempner and Arthur
Weinstein and their Scientifically Invalid "Studies" and
"Validations"-- These are bogus articles or research fraud.
4) Attacks (Color of Law Abuses): False Reports of Malpractice,
False Arrests, Stalking, McSweegan
and Fish's
Anonymous
Internet Disinformation Campaign, Wiretapping,
Harassment of Lyme and LYMErix victims.
=============================================
1) CHARGE: The
Steere/European/Dearborn
diagnostic standard is fraudulent and was meant to
a) falsely qualify
LYMErix and
b) set up a monopoly on what is in human blood (new
diseases, genetic susceptibilities to diseases), since Yale's L2
Diagnostics, Imugen, and Corixa were to be the only ones qualified to
test for VBDs after LYMErix was on the market.
LYMErix Western Blots were
unreadable with the OspA-B plasmid in the standard borrelia.
The central RICO patent was US Patent 6,045,804.
Corixa did the majority of the advertising for Yale, Schoen and
Allen Steere's little monopoly.
1)
Yale's Bb Flagellin Patent, 5.618,533
2)
Yale's LYMErix Patent, 5,747,294
3)
Padula, UCONN, 5,620,862 Strain B31
used by Quest Labs = Low or No
OspC or band 23 which is associated with brain invasion
4)
CDC officer Alan Barbour and "Immune System is Overhwhelmed," US
Patent 6,719,983-
5)
Tufts, Huber, 6,689,364 "LYMErix is a
toxin"
6)
Persing, Mayo Clinic, Monopoly Patent-6,045,804
7)
CDC's patents with SmithKline in Europe which
shows they know the Steere method is bogus.
8) Barbour's
flagella-less borrelia patent
9) 1996 B. theileri patent (Master's
Disease is Cow Relapsing Fever)
Alan Barbour patent application for Master's Disease
5,932,220
DAMAGES: Defrauding the FDA
and the public about the new, Dearborn definition of Lyme increased
the numbers of the permanent disabled who lost the opportunity for
early detection (the cabal did not use Yale' s US patent 5, 618, 533
method, which was valid), a lost opportunity for adequate
discovery in why the HIV vaccine failed, and discovery as to why Lyme was the New
Great Imitator:
Pam3Cys-associated immune suppression or tolerance to fungal
antigens (for TLR2), the resultant activation of latent viruses of
all kinds (Multiple Sclerosis and cancers), and the
tolerance-to-mycoplasma relationship to the onset of ALS.
NCI's and the US Army's Paul Duray recognized and informed the
ALDF/IDSA there was something wrong with the lymphocytes of chronic
Lyme victims in 1989 (IDSA
REVIEWS) and 1992 (Cold Spring Harbor
meeting).
Gary Wormser knew that OspA vaccination suppressed the immune system
but he still did not report this to the public or the FDA while this
vaccine was still on the market. He continued to pursue OspA
as a vaccine through Baxter.
Gary Wormser reporting the blunting
of the immune response in OspA vaccinated animals:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10865170?ordinalpos=5&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
"OspA interferes with the
response of lymphocytes to proliferative stimuli including a
blocking of cell cycle phase progression."
See more at
PAM3CYS_IMMUNE_SUPPRESSION.htm
If CDC & NIH officers were involved in
these crimes (and
they were) that's THEFT OF HONEST SERVICES
2)
Biomarkers discovered by the crooks,
but not deployed by IDSA or Mark Klempner. This includes all the
data found in the 1989 IDSA Reviews,
the ALS, cancer, and the MS data. If Mark Klempner knew about the
biomarkers but did not deploy them, while later stating that there
were no such signs of delirium in chronic Lyme victims, that's
scientific fraud, after delirium being stated as the reason for his
MMPs studies, that's scientific FRAUD. Everyone who declared
that we Lyme victims were not sick but just CRAZY, who knew about
these biomarkers, committed physical damages, death, permanent
disability, slander, libel and perjury.
3)
Mark
Klempner's 2001 fraudulent "long term
treatment" article is the basis of the IDSA phony
"guidelines."
This includes a charge of scientific fraud with intent to cause harm by deploying the non-scientific psychiatric morons to
discredit us with their abuse, imaginary bullshit, perjury, and
doubly-brain damaging
psychotropics. It is malpractice to treat a real brain disease
with CNS depressants, according to the American Psychiatric Association,
as that makes the brain damage worse.
This is also libel, perjury and slander against Lyme victims
and their treaters.
There are numerous instances of fraud in this
Klempner article (see the next item),
starting with Dearborn being knowingly a fraudulent standard by
anyone's definition, to deliberately fraudulent use of "checklists,"
(BigInsurance knows psychiatry is a fraud, a hoax, a collection of
self-deluded but useful fools), to
determining outcomes, to the non-disclosure of which primers
Klempner used.

Specific to the Klempner Krime, will be Arthur Weinstein's "Master
Validator" contributions to it: the "validation" of the FIQ for Lyme,
his phony chromatography"detector," and
his proposal that the "more antibodies makes the method more valid,."
not to mention what he did at Dearborn and as regards his role in
the ImmuLyme trial.
A) Weinstein
"validating" the FIQ for Lyme:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10513489?ordinalpos=3&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
A real validation of a method requires that the method not detect
two different analytes. This is something I wrote about for
the first ILADS Klempner rebuttal in June 2001, after which (a year
later), Stricker joined the Rebuttal team and took over.
B) Weinstein
"validating" his own Dearbornite concept that "more
antibodies means more valid," which is the opposite of the FDA's
rules on the validation of a method:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8053960?ordinalpos=5&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
▲This is supposedly a "validation" that only hypersensitivity
responses or inflammatory responses could be considered disease
processes, when all along stealth disablers would have the property
of a time bomb or a Trojan Horse, or not be identified until later,
as something else, like, oh, a New Great Imitator.
C)
Weinstein
comes up with his own kind of
chromatography detector and claims to be
responsible for teaching MDs how to do chromatography, which, if
they were paying attention, would spit the sides of the CT
Separations Science Council (CSSC).
D) Weinstein was
supposedly in charge of looking at the blots of the
ImmuLyme-sick cases.
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/216
Supported by Pasteur Mérieux Connaught.
We are indebted to the members of the
data and safety
monitoring board: Arthur Weinstein, M.D. (chairman),
George Washington School of Medicine, Washington,
D.C.
??
'When none of the Western Blots of OspA-vaccinated people were
even readable, so we wonder how Weinstein could be in charge of such
a group and not have ever looked at the "data," not to mention who
threw out ImmuLyme's bad data (which would be, at least partially,
Gary Wormser's responsibility and over which he was sued).
Now remember, through all of this, was Durland Fish, who is not a
scientist, but a bug-catcher. Fish was one of the original
founding four of the ALDF.com. NIH's Edward McSweegan
was Fish's tool and was apparently, the silent partner among the
founding three- John J.
Connolly, Gary Wormser and Durland Fish.
Crooks, being stupid, self-revealed themselves.
E) Weinstein's
Central Role at Dearborn, the scene of the crime.
◄ You can see that that is all bullshit, since, in fact, this clique
warped the FDA "Methods Validations" definitions (see the
Relapsing Fever
Homepage), and none of the labs agreed at all with the
Dressler/Steere recommendation (as I personally told the FDA Vaccine
Committee in January, 2001 and demonstrated in my 30
page booklet that I gave the FDA Vaccine Committee members but which
did not get scanned into the FDA's website what else is new the FDA
don't know the difference between real data and
the-man-in-the-moon), so this Weinstein Dearborn bullshit is just
plain lying bullshit.
No one agreed with Steere's proposal at Dearborn and the
Dressler/Steere prospective study showed only 39/54 of the ARTHRITIS patients had anything close to Steere's
hypersensitivity, "more antibodies is more valid," proposal.
So, Weinstein was at the scene in every part of the crime,
playing the role of the "validator."
Now, this is something I would know about since I am a real
BigPharma chemist, and the "development and validations of
analytical methods" happens to be what I did for a
living at Pfizer.
4) a) The
Patents tell a
different story, and b) and the
Primer
Shell Game.
Mark Klempner never published which
DNA or RNA primers he used to determine "No Lyme" in chronic Lyme
victims, while simultaneously throwing out cases that were positive
after treatment in his "long-term treatment" "study."
Meanwhile Gary Wormser et al have demonstrated that they know what
DNA and RNA primers to use when they want to find borrelial DNA or
RNA in ticks. So, to ever thence, since 1992, use OspA
primers to determine "Lyme," when they use flagellin and RNA primers
to find "borrelia" in humans, is
FRAUD.
This report shows that Gary Wormser has known since 1992 which
primers to used to detect borrelia:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=270592&blobtype=pdf
This report shows that Robert Schoen has
known since 1995 which primers to use to detect borrelia:
http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/reprint/35/1/233?view=long&pmid=8968914
▲This is also the report that goes with the Persing RICO or the
Persing monopoly patent▼:
6)
Persing, Mayo Clinic, Monopoly Patent-6,045,804
5) Brain-Permanent; all the
persistence past treatment or treatment failure articles by the crooks,
of which there are over 20. This despite IDSA/ALDF claims that
Lyme is "easily diagnosed and cured" and that "there is no such
thing as chronic Lyme" is self explanatory.
All the older data on Relapsing Fever
also says it is incurable and goes into a cyst form.
IDSA's Russell Johnson says the
cyst form may take months to reconstitute into tact spirochetes in
BSK media. That would be because the Mouse Infectivity test
would be better, and all the IDSA
crooks know it.
Yale's
James Phillips said this
Lyme RICO crime "should be written up in the New Yorker"
magazine. I will take a polygraph test, should the opportunity
arise.
The American Psychiatric
Association's Guidelines on the Treatment of a Delirium make it
double malpractice to treat Lyme brain with psychotropics since
all psychotropics are brain damaging
in and of themselves.
Phillips can be indicted with this
RICO gang because he knew all about it, yet perjured himself
about myself in order to avoid a malpractice lawsuit. He
said under oath, that what I said about Yale and these crimes
meant I was "like Ted Kascynski" and "a chemist," after he said
this RICO "should be written up in The New Yorker."
That is obstruction of justice in addition to perjury and
malpractice.
So much for the talents of
Mr. Peanut.
So much for penis-worship.
So much for men being smarter than
women.
So much for the Twilight Zone...
where the Modernists,
actually, go.
So much for "enlightenment."
So much for
"Psychiatry and Philosophy"
The crime should be charged by the Department of
Justice as a RICO because Yale knew they could not read their Western
Blots in LYMErix vaccinated people in 1995, as demonstrated by Yale's
Robert Schoen crime, as well as false claims to the United States or Qui
Tam:
1) Schoen on the
unreadable
Western Blots in 1995
2) Schoen instructing MDs to
blow
off LYMErix vaccine injury or failure cases in 1998.
Schoen never told anyone he could not read
his Western Blots in LYMErix vaccinated people. He especially did
not tell the FDA. Schoen also was involved in the development of
the RICO method:
The Lyme criminals could not even read their Western
Blots in LYMErix or ImmuLyme-vaccinated people, yet they claimed
to have used the Dearborn Method
to assess their vaccines outcomes:
Here are those 4 "we can't read our
OspA vaccine results" reports:
1)
SCHOEN and PERSING, with JOHN ANDERSON,1996 - the RICO
report:
http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/reprint/35/1/233?view=long&pmid=8968914
2) SCHOEN
AND PERSING IN THEIR 1996 RICO METHOD PATENT:
The Dave Persing, Mayo Clinic FRAUD
Patent-6,045,804
3) PERSING WITH SIGAL EXPLAINING THAT THE WESTERN
BLOTS WERE UNREADABLE, 2000:
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/313920
4) Yale's
ROBERT SCHOEN in the
1998
Munchausen's Book, instructing MDs to blow off
LYMErix systemically injured people ("but send the
post-vaccination blood to the Yale L2 Diagnostics RICO lab if
you must bother to be a physician").
This is a FALSE CLAIM or a QUI TAM
or FRAUD on the GOVERNMENT:
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00921.htm
They, Yale, Schoen, knew they could not read their Western Blots
in LYMErix-vaccinated people, but they wanted all the national
bloodwork sent to their labs (L2
Diagnostics and PolyGenomics), so they could patent, and pharm,
and be the only ones with access to the new vector borne diseases to
patent, and be the only ones with access to - nationally - genetic
information about disease susceptibilities (this has bioweapons
applications).
The 1998 Vaccines Reports
(ImmuLyme and LYMErix):
LYMErix results (76% "safe and
effective"):
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/209
ImmuLyme results (92% "safe and effective"):
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/216
From the LYMErix trial, "categories of outcomes:"
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content-nw/full/339/4/209/T1