IDSA's Secrets:

Bioweapon Attributes Dickson FDA Yale USDOJ RICO

PubMed: TLR2

"New World Disorder"
IDSA's Persistence "Cryme Disease" book Klempner's Fraud RICO Patents Osp-A/Viral Synergy Grants Search "TLR2" Kissinger NWO Beast
Relapsing Fever Dearborn Quotes Plum Island Corixa RICO "LYMErix ▲ Disease" Myco & Erythrocytes Rx Brain Damage
Steere Falsifies Test Dearborn Booklet Russians & NYMC CDCs Patents w/SKB GarthNicolson-GWI Rockefeller/Psychiatry
IDSA's Imitators Schoen-LYMErix IDSA: "Cyst Viable" DARPA Boots CDC Confronting Crooked NIH CT Med Board Hell/NDEs
IDSA's ShellGame Weinstein's Frauds LYMErix ►Imitators Auwaerter Epstein-Barr NIH Disinfo Foreign CPS' Sexual Assaults
IDSA's Biomarkers Yale's Valid Test UConn's KidTuskegee Plum Stupid Vaccines' Brain Damage Fraud With Intent   CPS' Entrapment
IDSA's Stupid Rx
 
Not used ▲to assess LYMErix? Yale's Congen Lyme
 
IDSA ▲ self-indicts
 

 
Update on Sex Abuse
 


24 May 2012 

HOME


Natural Remedies
 

CDC writes a "bogus article" on Mycoplasma in the blood and Chronic Fatigue.
 

Lyme/LYMErix Cryme Reveals  New Paradigm in Health/Disease:
"Bacterial/Viral Coinfections";

TLR2 (fungi)Signaling Depletes IRAK1 and Inhibits Induction of Type 1 by TLR7/9  (viruses)-- 
-CV Harding, 2012  (More in the chart at the bottom of this homepage)

CFIDS = Seronegative Chronic Active EBV

"Multiple Mechanisms of Immune Suppression by B Lymphocytes" (New and Trashes Yale and IDSA)

NIH's Treatment Recommendations for Chronic Active Epstein-Borreliosis, the chronic illness also induced by OspA vaccination or exposure to molds.

The Antics of the Crazy Stalker Durland Fish and the New Genre in "Education."
 


CDC Greed (won't answer the FOIA)

ELISA = arbitrary cutoff.

Disclaimer

Overview


TUSKEGEE - By Jerry Leonard


1998, CIA Oilmen & Israelis plan to overthrow Saddam for the oil.

Bush/Gore  Oil/War-(Oct,2000)  

Bush's own explainer (Oct 2000) re: Iraq Oil




 

 


BUSH SENIOR AND THE FIFTH COLUMN JEWS, self-explained

Ledeen, Perle, et al, now brickin' over an FBI investigation   (Well, that will be good.  Then the whole world won't be so pissed at the US,  especially if the FBI discovers that, indeed, there was no way for WTC 7 to have fallen down on command unless it was pre-loaded with explosives.  sharon_crime_hist.html)

"The point of the probe, sources believe, is not to examine the push to war but rather to ascertain whether Sharon recruited or helped place in office people who knowingly, and secretly, worked with him to affect the direction of US policy in the Middle East. The most likely targets of the inquiry are Douglas Feith, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and Harold Rhode of the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessment."

Israel's Fifth Column in Washington
The AIPAC spy scandal points to a massive undercover operation

Here's your answer, FBI:

 http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Team_B MUST READ

According to the web site of researcher/writer Edward J. Epstein [1], "Question: Bill Keller, referring to the famous exercise in intelligence evaluation in 1976 called Team B, an effort by those outside the 'intelligence fraternity to ... second-guess the analysis of the A Team professionals' of the CIA. Did Team B do more than 'second guess' the CIA? If so, what implications does it have for present policy makers in Washington?

"Answer: Team B did not 'second-guess' the CIA. It participated in a competitive analysis that remains a unique experiment in the annals of US intelligence.

"In January 1976, in response to pressure from the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB) to examine the way the CIA arrived at its National Intelligence Estimates, George Bush, then the newly appointed Director of Central Intelligence, agreed to a test in which both the CIA (called Team A) and a panel of non-CIA experts (called Team B) would independently analyze the same underlying material on three national security issues. ...

 

 "Van Cleave was a member of the infamous Team B Strategic Objectives Panel, an independent threat assessment committee authorized by George H. W. Bush, director of central intelligence in the Ford administration. Other team members included Richard Pipes (father of Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum) and Gen. Daniel Graham, whose "High Frontier" missile defense proposal foreshadowed President Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), or "Star Wars." The team's advisory panel included Paul Wolfowitz, Paul Nitze, and Seymour Weiss-all close associates of Albert Wohlstetter. (8) Van Cleave was an executive member of the Committee on the Present Danger (CPD), a political action group that shared the alarmist threat assessments of Team B. The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was modeled on the Committee on the Present Danger..."  (More here)

 

Watch carefully the following IASPS (see their website) deceptions.  Philosophies of men are not divine, and capitalism, and it's even more diabolical offspring, globalization, are abominations because they are based on deception:

"What? The Institute for Advanced Strategic & Political Studies (IASPS) is a Jerusalem-based think tank with an affiliated office in Washington, D.C.  Its main focus is "limited government" as Aristotle intends:  "men think the constitution enslaves them but it is their salvation." The great philosopher of the Western tradition also noted that philosophy or the use of man's intellect "is his divinest part." Accordingly, IASPS pursues the limitation of Israeli socialist statism supported by US aid, by means of free market reform and a robust missile defense. The link between these economic and geostrategic policies reflects a critique of those policies which stand in opposition to limited government and affect an undermining of the elementary truths of human order.  At the purely political level, IASPS policies stand in opposition to those supportive of statism and the diminution of the balance of power."

The Zionists/Elitists want to get rid of "statism," because they don't want the states, the countries, the actual owners of the remaining world resources, to continue to think they own them.  This is one big lie.

"HOW?   The Institute pursues its policy initiatives by training Israel's best university graduates in economics and strategic studies. These young people, in addition to serving as research aides in the Israeli parliament (Knesset) and the U.S. Congress, are becoming Israel's first independent policy community. This is to say their research (published in two series, one called Policy Studies, the other called IASPS Research Papers in Strategy) is not devised to get around already existing policies which are obstacles to economic growth and nation-state power (i.e., to be merely political documents). Rather, their research is to find and to articulate ways how to treat the circumstances created by these obstacles.  Thus, the policy assignment for IASPS's policy analysts is to fix the obstacles that prevent constructive change and growth and at the same time to fix the circumstances that have been created by them."

The following is self-aggrandizement and self-flattery.  This grandiosity is meant to impress people.  None of these things which they claim to achieve is actually science, or factual revelations, but their own processes of acquiring the mastery of spin:

"WHO & WHEN?     IASPS-Jerusalem was founded in 1984 by its president, Professor Robert J. Loewenberg.  Loewenberg founded IASPS after making aliyah to Israel from the U.S., where he remains a citizen.  Loewenberg took his Ph.D from Yale University in 1972 after several years of teaching at Hotchkiss Prep School in Lakeville, Connecticut.  Prior to that, he attended Columbia University (BA 1962), which he attended after three years in the U.S. Navy.  Before immigrating to Israel, Loewenberg was a tenured professor at Arizona State University.
        His published books and monographs include The Peace Process: An Introductory Essay (part 1); The Israeli Fate of Jewish Liberalism (with Edward Alexander); Emerson, An American Idol; Freedom's Despots; and Equality on the Oregon Frontier.  He has edited other books and contributed to collections on a wide range of subjects including SDI, foreign aid and economic policy, and has also published numerous articles in scholarly journals as well as opeds in The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Washington Times, Insight Magazine, The Los Angeles Times and elsewhere. He oversees all IASPS activities.
       William R. Van Cleave  is the director of the Division for Research in Strategy.  Professor Van Cleave is currently the Head of the Defense and Strategic Studies Department at Southwest Missouri State University. Prior to arriving at Missouri he was Professor of International Relations and Director of the Defense and Strategic Studies Program at the University of Southern California from 1967-87.  Professor Van Cleave is a Senior Research Fellow in National Security Affairs at the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University and a Member of the Board of Trustees of the International Institute of Strategic Studies.   His past professional experience includes being a member of the U.S. Delegation to the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks with the USSR, Special Assistant for Strategic Policy and Planning in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, member of the "B-Team" effort to review national intelligence on the USSR and to produce a competitive National Intelligence Estimate and a Member of the Executive Committee of the Committee on the Present Danger. He has also been a consultant to numerous government agencies. From 1979 to 1981 he was Senior Advisor and Defense Policy Coordinator to Ronald Reagan and Director of the Department of Defense Transition Team.  Professor Van Cleave is the author of numerous scholarly books and journal articles. He holds a B.A. in Political Science from the California State University and an M.A. and Ph.D. from the Claremont Graduate School."

 

Perle in an interview: "...you're going to find a disproportionate number of Jews in any sort of intellectual undertaking...there's clearly an undertone of anti-Semitism about it. There's no doubt."

 You see the logic:  They're brilliant because they were born that way, so they have to lie to us to corrupt the country in order to uncorrupt it, and if we call them stupid liars for undoing what the Founding Fathers did, we're antisemitic.

 That would be true only if semitic means "INSANE LIAR."