14 Feb 2012 

HOME

Pharma/CDC on Brain damage from vaccines, Fauci, Phages, Bioweapons manufacture

HHS.gov is Incompetent; BMJ calls fraud "crime.")

Official: CFIDS and MS-Lyme are the same disease; Epstein-Barr 


CDC Greed (won't answer the FOIA)

ELISA = arbitrary cutoff.

Disclaimer

Overview
 

TUSKEGEE - By Jerry Leonard

1998, CIA Oilmen & Israelis plan to overthrow Saddam for the oil.

Bush/Gore  Oil/War-(Oct,2000)  

Bush's own explainer (Oct 2000): Iraq Oil

Iraq was an oil-theft war.

Protestant/Psychiatric Confusion, Self-Explained:
 

Phillips, James "Key Concepts: Hermeneutics"
Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology - Volume 3, Number 1, March 1996, pp. 61-69
The Johns Hopkins University Press

Excerpt
 

Keywords: psychoanalysis, philosophy of science, nosology, classification

Hermeneutics is a concept whose breadth and significance have continued to grow in contemporary thought--and in psychiatry. Since its scope can be best appreciated through an historical overview of its development, I will begin there and then proceed to a discussion of its place in psychiatry. Derived from the Greek verb hermeneuein, which means "to interpret," and the noun hermemeia, "interpretation" (and both associated with the god Hermes), the word was first used in the seventeenth century to mean biblical exegesis (Palmer 1969). The Protestant Reformation created a need to interpret the scriptures without the aid of church authority, and with the plurality of possible interpretations for any biblical text, a need arose to establish the principles of correct interpretation. Hermeneutics was the study of such principles. While the scope and content of the hermeneutical enterprise have changed vastly since these beginnings in biblical exegesis, the concept of hermeneutics retains its initial reference to the art and science of interpreting. In Palmer's words, "Whenever rules and systems of explaining, understanding, or deciphering texts arise--there is hermeneutics" (1981, 458).

The scope of hermeneutics was broadened significantly in the nineteenth century through the philosophers Friedrich Schleiermacher and Wilhelm Dilthey, who moved the focus of hermeneutical understanding from texts to all human productions--verbal and nonverbal, historical and current. For Dilthey the task was to respond to the nineteenth-century challenge that all knowledge must follow the model of the burgeoning physical sciences. He sought to secure for the humanist or cultural disciplines such as literature and history (the Geisteswissenschaften) a status that was different from but on par with that of the physical...

 

http://philo.8m.com/phillips.html

“In concluding this review I would like to summarize what I consider the major features of a hermeneutic orientation in psychiatry. (1) A hermeneutic approach will focus on those conditions, and those aspects of any condition, that call for an interpretation of the meaning structures that play a significant role in the condition. It will also evince a sensitivity to the boundaries between meaning-oriented and other explanatory modalities. (2) This approach will emphasize the historicity of any theoretical point of view, any diagnostic system, and any therapeutic modality in psychiatry. This involves a recognition that there is no value-free or presuppositionless orientation in this field. One of the challenges of the hermeneutic effort is to promote "conversation" among the differing approaches, both at theoretical level and at the level of treatment of the individual patient. (3) The hermeneutic approach will subordinate the universal to the particular--that is, theory takes second place to the understanding and care of the individual patient. Psychiatric knowledge is thus practical and organized for treatment of the individual patient. (4) Finally, as a practical discipline, directed toward the care of the individual patient and allowing an inevitable plurality of perspectives in the provision of that care, psychiatric knowledge is finite, limited, and subject to ongoing revision.”—James Phillips.

 

Uh-duh.

Sir Thomas More on CT Med Board's Hypocrisy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RgYue-aP_s

"You'll labor like scholars over a bulldog's pedigree but you
would have snored through the Sermon on the Mount"
 

²⁴"You ^(Z)blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel!

 ²³"^(Y)Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2023&version=NASB