The Scientist and the
Lunatic-
The story of Crazy Eddie McSweegan and a real scientist, Paul Duray.
How
the immune system damage caused by Lyme Disease (Relapsing Fever plus a
fungal
antigen, OspA) and LYMErix (OspA) vaccination, discovered by a real scientist,
was blocked and buried for 16 years by a paranoid, stalking,
vain-arrogant-stupid, grandiose lunatic, who trashed his co-workers throughout
his entire career as means of advancement.
The bottom line is, did the
HIV vaccines, if they have Pam3Cys on them, not work for the same reason
OspA vaccination did not work?
Could years of research been
put back on the right path in both of these diseases, starting in 1992, when
this lymphocyte abnormality was first recognized by Paul Duray if it was
followed up on instead of suppressed?
The suppression of the
suppression data, is the crux of the Lyme Cryme.
Paul Duray is a plain old
genuine bioweaponeer.
Sweeg never was. He cut
himself out of the loop due to psychopathy.
Then he started just making
it all up in his head.
Eddie is a psychopath and always
wanted to be a famous scientist. He worked for the US Navy who had acquired the
booty from the Japanese Bioweapons Unit 731 in Manchuria after WWII. The Navy
was clearly performing some biological and chemical weapons research, and Crazy
Eddie learned about it:
http://www.actionlyme.org/GOLDWATER_LETTER.htm
It all went to his head.
He then thought himself a
world-class bioweapons-insider spook. We believe he still thinks he is some
kind of bioweapons insider, but as we will later see, he’s clueless and actually
has been left out of the secret US Biodefense bioweaponeers loop for a long
time. He then went into fantasy story writing, since that’s all the material he
had to work with, so to speak.
Crazy Eddie admits to his early
delusional, grandiose nature, here:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BIOCRIMES_AND_MISDEMEANORS.htm
As a graduate student
twenty years ago, I had a departmental recruiting poster
tacked up on the wall next to my desk. It read, in part,
"If you are
curious,
patient, and awfully damned intelligent, consider a Ph.D. in microbiology."
In
1984 a degree in microbiology seemed like a good idea.
AIDS was just exploding on
the scene. Lyme disease was racing through the
Northeast. Evidence was emerging that a bizarre neurologic disease might
be
caused by an equally bizarre infectious agent called a prion. And
recombinant
DNA techniques, discovered a decade earlier, were rapidly helping to create
a
multi-billion dollar industry in the U.S.
After trashing the US Navy to
Senator Goldwater and 20 other senators and congressman, Sweeg found himself at
the NIH as the head of the “Lyme Program.” Remind yourselves that Willy
Burgdorfer, a real scientist, says of Sweeg’s handling of the Lyme Program:
“AFTER 30 YEARS, WE HAVE NOTHING!”
Those of us who have been
following Crazy Eddie’s antics over the last 20 years, and I remind, as regards
the lawsuits over his stalking, harassment, and Deliberate Release of internet
disinformation campaign using a remailer to hide his address, know from Karen
Forschner of the Lyme Disease Foundation, one of his first victims:
(DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT):
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/msg/c5e50e5b067b2565?dmode=source
Message from discussion
nadie@cotse.com archive: Re: Submitted to FDA with supporting
View parsed -
Show only message text
Path:
supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!europa.netcrusader.net!152.163.239.129!portc01.blue.aol.com!audrey05.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 83
X-Admin: n...@aol.com
From: writer0...@aol.com (Writer0608 = KAREN FORSCHNER OF THE
www.lyme.org )
Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
Date: 08 Feb 2001 17:58:31 GMT
References: <981546178.3a8134c2ca3e5@webmail.cotse.com>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: Re: na...@cotse.com archive: Re: Submitted to FDA with supporting
Message-ID: <20010208125831.05749.00000046@ng-md1.aol.com>
Anon:
Sorry you have so much confused and incorrect. Why would you keep attributing
statements to me, that you know I did not say? You need to be accurate.
My concern is that you are fixated on me, and that fixation is increasing.
Including increasing over the internet.
Ed did say "Buzz-off Karen." Not very mature. And, I did not go up to him. I
noticed him after I was talking with Phil Baker. And, he was there with Phil.
I wonder how his lawsuit against NIH is going. Is he claiming conspiracy
again?
And, the document was missing when it was FOI'd. Ed even sent an email to
the
reporter, asking why she was interested in the document(s). But, I guess you
know this.
You state "I heard both conversations went badly." What do you think you
"heard"? Now, be careful, because you need to cite first hand information,
not
gossip. Who told you the information, Phil or Ed?
Lastly, I admit that I did cry during the deposition. Yup. It was during a
reading of material Ed admitted writing, that mocked our dead son and pets.
And, a number of such writings were done WHILE he was a public official
working at NIH as LD Project Officer.
I was also surprised that Ed, (while a Public Official and LD Program
Officer)
was tracking my parents address and phone numbers; my home address and phone
numbers; my travel agent's information; employee names, home addresses, home
phone numbers; my movements while working for the LDF; and had been at the
LDF's office.
He even had tracked down and talked with a person working with Dr. Joe
Burrascano. Keeping their informtion in his files. I was also surprised to
see
his point system, giving himself a score when he was able to harm/interfere
with an LDF/Karen initiative. This was happening while he was the LD project
officer.
When was he working? And, who else did he track that he wasn't caught
tracking?
Anon, if you plan to cite depositions I suggest this format.
These are regarding various charges Ed made about the LDF. Ed's deposition.
Q's
are by lawyers to Ed. A's are Eds answers.
p229 lines 11-13.
"Q. But you have no factual basis to rely on?
A. Not at the moment."
p 288 lines 1-8
"Q. And what was your basis for saying this may invite investigation and
prosecution?
(ed -accusing the LDF of a wide range of things while NIH LD Program
Office)
A. Clairvoyance.
Q. Anything else?
A. Wishful thinking. I don't know.
Q. Clairvoyance and wishful thinking, okay. Anything else's?
A. No, I didn't have any knowledge of anything related to investigations at
the
time."
p 147 lines 15-22 p 148 lines 1-6
"Q. Are the things you've said about them, the Forschners or the Foundation,
that you believe to be true but that you didn't necessarily follow up on and
check yourself before you made those statements?
A. For example?
Q Anything
A. I don't think so.
Q In other words, if you made a statement about the Forschners or the Lyme
Disease Foundation that you didn't have personal knowledge about, did you
make
an inquiry about it before you would make that statement in writing or orally
to make sure it was accurate?
A. Yes, but, in fact, I have no personal knowledge of anything."
The LDF received a lot of material from Ed during the time he was suing the
LDF. Much of this crossed lines from NIH to CDC and to the FDA.
Ed
appeared
to be very concerned with the activities of various people and we were not
the
only ones to receive threats, retaliation, or reporting to federal
authorities.
His own colleagues and a grantee was included as targets to be turned in
to
federal, state, and local officials accused of serious wrongdoing.
It wasn't just the LDF.
------
We know from the harassment
of the Forschners that Crazy Eddie has
clairvoyance and wishful thinking, and that he also harassed all his
co-workers. It wasn’t just the LDF.
------
▼Willy's
look of total disgust at what Sweeg and the gang did with the disease he
discovered.
"AFTER 30 YEARS WE HAVE NOTHING!!!" - Willy Burgdorfer
Willy Burgdorfer's "NOTHING!!" quote... was..The LymeLiers Speak (Libel
= intent to cause harm)
Willy Burgdorfer’s 30 Years of Nothing
and Paul Duray’s mutated chronic Lyme lymphocytes:
The false claims;
1) The lies about chronic Lyme
being instead some hypothetical psychiatric (since all of psychiatry is
hypothetical) hysteria or some sort of [fill in the blank] subconscious need,
2) that LYMErix or OspA caused the same immune suppression outcomes as chronic
Lyme,
3) that Yale and Gary Wormser knew about but lied about these outcomes,
http://www.actionlyme.org/SCHOEN_INSTRUCTING_DOCS_TO_BLOW_OFF_LYMERIX_INJUREES.htm
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10865170?ordinalpos=5&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
4) that the RICO data stolen off
CT AG Richard Blumenthal's desk was given to two Yale associates who said under
oath that this stolen RICO data meant I was "dangerously intelligent," "a
chemist," and "like Ted Kaszynski,"
http://www.actionlyme.org/BLUMENTHALS_MAIL_STOLEN_BY_JESSICA_GAUVIN.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/MARCUS_DANGEROUS_INCOMPETENCE.htm
5) that the years and years of
lies about what chronic Lyme is / was in the interests of Kaiser-Permanente at
New York Medical College and ***their relationship with CDC officers in the
ALDF.com cabal*** (Steere and Barbour),
http://www.actionlyme.org/JUNE_13_2005_LETTER_TO_SPITZER.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/CONNOLLY_FISH_WEINSTEIN.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/ALDF_BOARD.htm
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thread/thread/94e9d21309f76177/508d7369ce25f5cc?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=evan+greenberg+mortimer+zuckerman+ALDF+sponsors#508d7369ce25f5cc
http://www.actionlyme.org/OTHER_ALDF_SPONSORS..htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm
6) the fact that the deliberate
suppression of the New Great Imitator outcomes, cases not detected by the
Steere/Dearborn Method or a Lyme ELISA until they progress into the deadlier
stages- ALS, MS, Lupus, Dementia, Cancer:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CHP_9_IDSA_REVIEWS.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRYMEDISEASE_CHP3_B.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/ALSLYME47.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/IDSA_GREATIMITATOR.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/MARTIN_NIH_OLIGOCLONAL.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/MARTIN_MS_1988.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYME_AND_LUPUS_STEERE.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/GANGLIOSIDES_STEERE_BENACH.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAIN_PERMANENT.htm
very much appear to be the result of this lipopeptide-induced tolerance and
immune-suppression related activation of latent viruses of all kinds
(Epstein-Barr, Cytomegalovirus, HHV-6, etc), and were noticed and mentioned by
NCI, NIH, and US Army Pathologist (Ft. Detrick) Paul Duray at the Cold Spring
Harbor Conference in 1992, were recorded in a book by Steve Schutzer, and
very strongly appears to have adversely affected HIV vaccine and other medical
research development for at least 10 years. (This is probably a world
record for longest sentence.)
http://www.actionlyme.org/BIOMARKERS2.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/FUNGAL_VACCINES.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/Duray.htm

"On occasion, these
atypical-appearing large lymphocytes have been misinterpreted in biopsy by
several laboratories as cells of a malignant lymphoma or leukemia. Bb antigens,
then, may stimulate growth of immature lymphocytic suibsets in some target
organs, as well as in the cerebrospinal fluid (Szyfelbein and Ross 1988). Usual
bacterial infections do not produce such lymphocytic infiltrates in tissue.
These immunoblastoid cells in Bb infections at times resemble those found in
Epstein-Barr virus infections. Does Bb reactivate latent virus infections in
tissues? Do some tick inocula harbor simultaneous infectious agents (ixodid
ticks can harbor Rickettsiae, Babesia microti, and Ehrlichia bacteria, in
addition to Bb), producing multi-agent infections in some hosts? Further
studies can clarify these issues by mans of tissue-based molecular probe
analysis." - Paul Duray, NCI, NIH, Ft. Detrick, at the 1992 Cold
Spring Harbor Crooks' Conference, published in Steve Schutzer's Lyme
Disease: Molecular and Immunologic Approaches.
http://www.amazon.com/Lyme-Disease-Immunologic-Approaches-Communications/dp/0879693770/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1214848669&sr=1-2
"These immunoblastoid cells in Bb infections at times resemble those found
in Epstein-Barr virus infections. Does Bb reactivate latent virus
infections in tissues? Do some tick inocula harbor simultaneous
infectious agents (ixodid ticks can harbor Rickettsiae, Babesia microti, and
Ehrlichia bacteria, in addition to Bb), producing multi-agent infections in
some hosts?"
Now let’s assume the limits in
immune system pathologies are unknown. There is no AIDS vaccine, there is no
Lyme vaccine, attempts at fungal vaccines failed previously (tuberculosis), no
one quite understands all the mechanisms of allergies shots, and much data on
immunity is buried in lies because it has bioweapons potential. (See the PNAC
document, page 60, on race specific bioweapons
http://www.actionlyme.org/PNAC.pdf )
Dr. Roland Martin at NINDS did
not find Lyme to be an autoimmune T cell disease through the ridiculous library
method (so, he went back home to Germany):
http://www.actionlyme.org/MARTIN_NINDS_MS_CHRONIC_LYME.htm
And Allen Steere did not find
Lyme to be an autoimmune T cell disease through the ridiculous library method
(so he hid in his high security lab with the T cells and the violin blah, blah,
poor thing with the depression and the paranoid delusions about being stalked):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18191206?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
http://www.actionlyme.org/STEERE_FAIRY_UNSTALKED.htm
“…Steere's lab and private
office were in their own section of the hospital, tightly guarded by
bolts and alarms. When I rang the bell at his lab, a woman looked at me
through a glass pane and then buzzed me in. Since Steere's testimony in
Congress, his hair had receded, leaving him nearly bald, and with his white
coat and pale skin there was something slightly ghostly about him…”
Yale, et al, deliberately lied
to the FDA about the outcomes of LYMErix, the 2 OspA vaccine trial
administrators (ImmuLyme and LYMErix) reported 4 times that they actually could
not read their Western Blots in LYMErix vaccinated people, yet they reported 92%
and 76% safe and affective vaccines anyway, they lied about what Lyme was in
order to have a fake vaccine trial (Steere in Europe with the bogus high-passage
strains in Europe to falsify the antibody panel), and then they stalked and
trashed the victims and the whistleblowers.
LYMErix disease® is basically the same disease
as Lyme disease®- the immune suppression related disorders that we do
not expect to be unlike Sick-Building Syndrome or the immune suppression
outcomes of chronic mold (airborne fungal antigens like OspA) exposure:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sick_building_syndrome
It’s almost useless to
hypothesize what are the possible outcomes from the already-identified and
numerous immune dysregulation mechanisms caused by exposure to molds or fungal
antigens. Insurance companies recognize the Sick Building and Asthma outcomes
of new mold exposures. If BigInsurance won’t insure molds exposures, this
suggests that BigInsurance knows Lyme is a chronic illness.
Note there are two HLA-esque
(race-specific PNAC bioweapons) ends of the inhaled fungi spectrum- asthma and
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and possibly extra, induced, chemical sensitivities,
due to the constant morphing of spirochetal antigens. If someone has a new
autoimmune hypersensitivity disease as a result of chronic Lyme, one would
expect that to be probably the result of antigenic variation. We don't know.
With this many variables and this many impediments to discovery, we have barely
scratched the surface. Perhaps it is possible that sooner or later the bug
could create something that your antibodies (or-HLA-complex) find to be
hyperstimulatory. This can happen even with immune suppression, since the
antigens are of different types and can affect different TLRs.
Says Alan Barbour in one of his
patents:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CENTRAL_LYME_RICO_PATENTS.htm
You don't know how exhausted I am
or how hard it is to concentrate on making all these variables and data and
crime fit into a logical essay on how Edward McSweegan, Inc (Ed is the missing
fourth partner at
www.aldf.com ) bungled all aspects of US
Medicine with a monstrous migraine and a
my-head-feels-like-someone-opened-it-up-and-poured-cement-in chronic, daily
condition. No, that's not what Barbour says. He says:
http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,719,983.PN.&OS=PN/6,719,983&RS=PN/6,719,983
2.1 Methods of
Treatment
"An important aspect of the invention is the recognition that Borrelia
VMP-like sequences recombine at the vls site, with the result that antigenic
variation is virtually limitless. Multiclonal populations therefore can
exist in an infected patient so that immunological defenses are severely
tested if not totally overwhelmed."
That means the Yale/Steere/Dearborn method
is useless for people who do not have Steere's haplotypes.
As an aside, says the murdered
Don Wiley:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=11877480

This is the story of how Sweeg and Yale obstructed research in all chronic
diseases with their lies about LYMErix and Lyme disease, and especially HIV
research. The NIH has now admitted that they have to throw in the towel
and start over on HIV, and that entire disastrous condition and event looks very
much like the effect of the immune suppression results of Pam3Cys (OspA) used as
an adjuvant on the HIV vaccine.
Where to find Pam3Cys and Pam2Cys:
http://www.jimmunol.org/cgi/content/full/173/4/2683
LPS binding protein (LBP) is an acute-phase protein synthesized
predominantly in the liver of the mammalian host. It was first
described to bind LPS of Gram-negative bacteria and transfer
it via a
CD14-enhanced mechanism to a receptor complex including TLR-4 and
MD-2, initiating a signal transduction cascade leading to the release
of proinflammatory cytokines. In recent studies, we found that LBP
also mediates cytokine induction caused by compounds derived from
Gram-positive bacteria, including lipoteichoic acid and peptidoglycan
fragments. Lipoproteins and lipopeptides have repeatedly been shown
to act as potent cytokine inducers, interacting with TLR-2, in
synergy with TLR-1 or -6. In this study, we show that these compounds
also interact with LBP and CD14. We used triacylated lipopeptides,
corresponding to lipoproteins of Borrelia burgdorferi, mycobacteria,
and Escherichia coli, as well as diacylated lipopeptides,
corresponding to, e.g., 2-kDa macrophage activating lipopeptide of
Mycoplasma spp. Activation of Chinese hamster ovary cells
transfected with TLR-2 by both lipopeptides was enhanced by
cotransfection of CD14. Responsiveness of human mononuclear cells to
these compounds was greatly enhanced in the presence of human LBP.
Binding of lipopeptides to LBP as well as competitive inhibition of
this interaction by LPS was demonstrated in a microplate assay.
Furthermore, we were able to show that LBP transfers lipopeptides to
CD14 on human monocytes using FACS analysis. These results support
that LBP is a pattern recognition receptor transferring a variety of
bacterial ligands including the two major types of lipopeptides
to CD14 present in different receptor complexes.
Pam3Cys (it may
be Pam2Cys) activates HIV replication:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=15312143
Immunology.
2004 September;
113(1):
121–129.
Copyright © 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Lipid-associated membrane
proteins of Mycoplasma fermentans
and M. penetrans activate
human immunodeficiency virus long-terminal repeats through Toll-like receptors
Mycoplasmas are known to
enhance human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication, and mycoplasma-derived
lipid extracts have been reported to activate nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) through
Toll-like receptors (TLRs). In this study, we examined the involvement of
TLRs in the activation of HIV long-terminal repeats (LTR) by mycoplasma and
their active components responsible for the TLR activation. Lipid-associated
membrane proteins (LAMPs) from two species of mycoplasma (Mycoplasma
fermentans and M.
penetrans) that are associated with acquired immune-deficiency
syndrome (AIDS), were found to activate HIV LTRs in a human monocytic cell line,
THP-1. NF-κB deletion from the LTR resulted in inhibition of the activation. The
LTR activation by M. fermentans
LAMPs was inhibited by a dominant negative (DN) construct of TLR1 and TLR6,
whereas HIV LTR activation by M.
penetrans LAMPs was inhibited by DN TLR1, but not by DN TLR6.
These results indicate that the activation of HIV LTRs by
M. fermentans and
M. penetrans LAMPs is dependent
on NF-κB, and that the activation of HIV LTR by
M. fermentans LAMPs is
mediated through TLR1, TLR2 and TLR6. In contrast, the LTR activation
by M. penetrans LAMPs is
carried out through TLR1 and TLR2, but not TLR6. Subsequently, the active
component of M. penetrans
and M. fermentans LAMPs
was purified by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
Interestingly, the purified lipoprotein of
M. penetrans LAMPs (LPMp) was
able to activate NF-κB through TLR1 and TLR2. On the other hand, the activation
of NF-κB by purified lipoprotein of
M.
fermentans LAMPs (LPMf) was mediated through TLR2 and TLR6, but
not TLR1.
http://www.jimmunol.org/cgi/content/full/173/4/2660
Mycobacterium tuberculosis LprG (Rv1411c): A Novel TLR-2 Ligand That
Inhibits Human Macrophage Class II MHC Antigen Processing1
"Signaling
through TLR-2 by lipoproteins may represent a double-edged sword for host responses to chronic intracellular pathogens
such as M. tuberculosis. Short-term signaling through TLR-2 activates macrophages and initiates acute inflammation that
may
help control initial infection. In contrast, prolonged TLR-2 signaling in macrophages results in down-regulation of certain
critical immune functions, such as MHC-II Ag processing. M.
tuberculosis infects, survives, and persists in macrophages.
The
ability of M. tuberculosis to survive acute inflammation positions the bacilli to take advantage, through secretion of
lipoproteins such as LprG and LpqH, of
this down-regulation of macrophage
immune function."
The
Journal of Immunology, 2004, 173: 2660-2668.
Copyright © 2004 by
The American Association of Immunologists
We
looked into the matter of whether or not the Lyme criminals had actually
published anything that really proved they
had a vaccine. We found numerous reports that showed this vaccine failed in
animal studies.
http://www.actionlyme.org/FUNGAL_VACCINES.htm
And:
"Accordingly, the methods of the invention provide a powerful and selective
approach for modulating the innate immune response pathways in animals
without giving rise to the toxicities often associated with the native
bacterial components that normally stimulate those pathways."
http://patft.uspto.gov/6,800,613
"Although a
single ligation of TLRs induces responses such as TNF production,
repeated ligation will lead to a loss of response, i.e., the
cells become tolerant." http://www.jimmunol.org/cgi/content/full/173/4/2736
"Borrelia
burgdorferi-Induced Tolerance as a Model of Persistence via
Immunosuppression" - "In summary, we characterized tolerance induced
by B. burgdorferi, describing a model of desensitization
which might mirror the immunosuppression recently attributed to
the persistence of Borrelia in immunocompetent hosts."
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=12819085
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16889623?ordinalpos=8&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
Cell Microbiol. 2007 Jan;9(1):142-53. Epub 2006 Aug 2.Click here to read Links
The inhibitory effect of Mycoplasma
fermentans on tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha-induced apoptosis
resides in the membrane lipoproteins.
Gerlic M, Horowitz J, Farkash S, Horowitz S.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences,
Soroka
University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva,
Israel,
84105.
Mycoplasma have been shown to be involved in the alteration of several
eukaryotic
cell functions, such as cytokine production, gene expression and more. We
have previously
reported that infection of human myelomonocytic U937 cell line with live
Mycoplasma
fermentans (M. fermentans) inhibited tumour necrosis factor
(TNF-alpha)-induced
apoptosis. Mycoplasmal membrane lipoproteins are considered to be the most
potent
initiators of inflammatory reactions in mycoplasmal infections. The aim of
this
study was to clarify whether the inhibitory effect on TNFalpha-induced
apoptosis
is exerted by M. fermentans lipoproteins (LPMf). A significant reduction in
TNFalpha-induced
apoptosis was demonstrated by stimulation of U937 cells with M. fermentans
total
proteins, LPMf or MALP-2 (M. fermentans synthetic lipopeptide), but not with
M.
fermentans hydrophilic protein preparation (AqMf). ***To investigate the
mechanism
of M. fermentans antiapoptotic effect, the reduction of mitochondrial
transmembrane
potential (delta psi m) was measured. M. fermentans total proteins LPMf and
MALP-2,
but not AqMf, inhibited the reduction of delta psi m. In addition, M.
fermentans
total proteins LPMf and MALP-2, but not AqMf, downregulated the formation
of active
caspase-8.*** NF-kappaB was transactivated in cells treated with M.
fermentans
lipoproteins, and was essential for host cell survival, but not for the
inhibition
of TNFalpha-induced apoptosis by LPMf. *** Our results suggest that the
inhibitory
effect exerted by M. fermentans on TNFalpha-induced apoptosis in U937 cells
is due
to the membrane lipoproteins of these bacteria.***
OspA anchors the auto-kill kinase.
Latent virally infected cells become, unlatent virally infected cells.
They don't autokill before the viruses break free of the cells and spread around
in the system again when the works are gunked up by OspA, or shed borrelial
lipoproteins, or:
"These immunoblastoid cells in Bb
infections at times resemble those found in Epstein-Barr virus infections.
Does Bb reactivate latent virus infections in tissues? Do some tick inocula
harbor simultaneous infectious agents (ixodid ticks can harbor Rickettsiae,
Babesia microti, and Ehrlichia bacteria, in addition to Bb), producing
multi-agent infections in some hosts?"
More from
FUNGAL VACCINES:
A)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10792376&dopt=Abstract
The 19-kD antigen and protective immunity in
a murine model of tuberculosis.
Yeremeev VV, Lyadova IV, Nikonenko BV, Apt AS, Abou-Zeid C, Inwald J,
Young DB.
"The
19-kD antigen is a cell wall-associated lipoprotein present in Mycobacterium
tuberculosis and in bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine strains.
Expression of the 19-kD antigen as a recombinant protein in two saprophytic
mycobacteria-M. vaccae and M. smegmatis-resulted in abrogation of their
ability to confer protection against M. tuberculosis in a murine challenge
model, and in their ability to prime a DTH response to cross-reactive
mycobacterial antigens. Induction of an immune response to the 19-kD antigen
by an alternative approach of DNA vaccination had no effect on subsequent M.
tuberculosis challenge. These results are consistent with a model in
which the presence of the 19-kD protein has a detrimental effect on the
efficacy of vaccination with live mycobacteria. Targeted inactivation of
genes encoding selected antigens represents a potential route towards
development of improved vaccine candidates."
B)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11179309&dopt=Abstract
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
19-kilodalton lipoprotein inhibits Mycobacterium smegmatis-induced cytokine
production by human macrophages in vitro.
Post FA, Manca C, Neyrolles O, Ryffel B, Young DB, Kaplan G.
Vaccination of mice with Mycobacterium
vaccae or M. smegmatis induces some protection against M. tuberculosis
challenge. The 19-kDa lipoprotein of M. tuberculosis, expressed in M. vaccae
or M. smegmatis (M. smeg19kDa), abrogates this protective immunity. To
investigate the mechanism of this suppression of immunity, human
monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) were infected with M. smeg19kDa.
Infection resulted in reduced production of tumor necrosis factor alpha
(TNF-alpha) (P < 0.01), interleukin-12 (IL-12) (P < 0.05), IL-6 (P < 0.05),
and IL-10 (P < 0.05), compared to infection with M. smegmatis vector (M.
smegV). Infection with M. smeg19kDa and with M. smegV had no differential
effect on expression of costimulatory molecules on MDM, nor did it affect
the proliferation of presensitized T cells cocultured with infected MDM.
When MDM were infected with M. smegmatis expressing mutated forms of the
19-kDa lipoprotein, including non-O-glycosylated (M. smeg19NOG), nonsecreted
(M. smeg19NS), and nonacylated (M. smeg19NA) variants, the reduced
production of TNF-alpha or IL-12 was not observed. When the purified 19-kDa
lipoprotein was added directly to cultures of infected monocytes, there was
little effect on either induction of cytokine production or its inhibition.
Thus, the immunosuppressive effect is dependent on glycosylated and acylated
19-kDa lipoprotein present in the phagosome containing the mycobacterium. These results suggest that the diminished protection against challenge with
M. tuberculosis seen in mice vaccinated with M. smegmatis expressing the
19-kDa lipoprotein is the result of reduced TNF-alpha and IL-12 production,
possibly leading to reduced induction of T-cell activation."
C)
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=12761093
-
Infect
Immun. 2003 Jun;71(6):3146-54.
Related Articles,
Links
-
-
The Mycobacterium tuberculosis recombinant 27-kilodalton
lipoprotein induces a strong Th1-type immune response deleterious to
protection.
Hovav AH, Mullerad J, Davidovitch L, Fishman Y, Bigi F, Cataldi A, Bercovier
H.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew
University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Th1 immune response is essential in the protection against mycobacterial
intracellular pathogens. Lipoproteins trigger both humoral and cellular
immune responses and may be candidate protective antigens. We studied in
BALB/c mice the immunogenicity and the protection offered by the recombinant
27-kDa Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipoprotein and the corresponding DNA
vaccine. Immunization with the 27-kDa antigen resulted in high titers of
immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) and IgG2a with a typical Th1 profile and a strong
delayed hypersensitivity response. A strong proliferation response was
observed in splenocytes, and significant nitric oxide production and gamma
interferon secretion but not interleukin 10 secretion were measured. Based
on these criteria, the 27-kDa antigen induced a typical Th1-type immune
response thought to be necessary for protection. Surprisingly, in
27-kDa-vaccinated mice (protein or DNA vaccines) challenged by M.
tuberculosis H37Rv or BCG strains, there was a significant increase in
the numbers of CFU in the spleen compared to that for control groups. Furthermore, the protection provided by BCG or other mycobacterial antigens
was completely abolished once the 27-kDa antigen was added to the vaccine
preparations. This study indicates that the 27-kDa antigen has an adverse
effect on the protection afforded by recognized vaccines. We are currently
studying how the 27-kDa antigen modulates the mouse immune response.
We don't know if these are
Pam3Cys or Pam2Cys or what these antigens are (at the present time), but one
could say that this stupid Lyme clique either did not look into other known
fungal vaccine antigens or they did not care, or both. Nevertheless, not
only did LYMErix not work and appear to activate latent infections of all kinds,
as Paul Duray says and as I suggested to the FDA in 2001, but tuberculosis
vaccines seem to have failed in the same way. Now the HIV vaccine has also
failed in the same way.
All fungal vaccines appear to
have failed because they suppress the immune system.
Now ask yourself: If all
fungal antigens as vaccines failed because they suppressed the immune system,
how could Lyme be an inflammatory disease, only? With this much data
showing the known mechanisms of illness caused by these strange lipids,
There are several
patents related to Pam3Cys (tripalmitoyl) as an adjuvant and HIV:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=tripalmitoyl&FIELD1=&co1=AND&TERM2=HIV&FIELD2=&d=PTXT
The first record
that we can find on the OspA kind of antigen:
1983: Synthesis of the
mitogenic S-[2,3-bis(palmitoyloxy)propyl]-N-palmitoylpentapeptide from
Escherichia coli lipoprotein.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6347861?ordinalpos=131&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
Several reports which make it
appear as if the Pam3Cys type of antigen was used as an HIV vaccine adjuvant or
is actually part of the HIV gp120 and gp41 (I cannot find out officially):
1)
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1421990&blobtype=pdf
2)
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=1349173
3)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18524817?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
We found decreased
Toll-like receptor 1 (TLR1) and TLR4 surface expression in HIV-infected U1
monocytic cells compared to the uninfected parental U937 cell line and
decreased TLR message in alveolar macrophages (AMs) from HIV-positive
subjects. In addition, stimulation with TLR1/2 ligand (Pam(3)Cys) or TLR4
ligand (lipopolysaccharide) resulted in decreased intracellular
phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase and subsequent
decreased transcription and expression of TNF-alpha in U1 cells compared to
U937 cells.
4)
http://journal.kcsnet.or.kr/main/j_search/j_download.htm?code=B961118
(Korean Journal where they blew up this HIV-Pam3Cys thing to look for

“We are currently using
several mass spectral techniques to characterize the amino acid sequences of
the Pam3Cys peptides found in the envelop glycoproteins of the HIV-1 and the
Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV).(17) Convential FAB-MS analysis using
standard matrices, such as glycerol and nitrobenzyl alcohol, is not
particularly effective for these molecules, largely due to their tendency
to aggregate”
[“their tendency to aggregate” …like what happened with
LYMErix and the
Western blot smudging, we think. We think they could never guarantee completely
free OspA antigens in a vial of vaccine, and previous reports about HPLC assay
of OspA, I suspect had a –prefiltering and pre-HPLC step because we always knew
OspA was a sticky lipid and even sticks to itself, since Alan Barbour reported
that phenomenon.]
The most important information to
be gleaned from that Korean report above is that it appears that Pam3Cys is
stuck on HIV antigens either naturally, or as an adjuvant (or both,
inadvertantly). Previously we learned that something in tick saliva
blocks HIV transmission. I hypothesize that whatever blocks HIV in tick saliva
also blocks OspA (given OspA’s tendency to cause spirochetes to even stick
together), and that that would be advantageous to the tick, not having
spirochetes and perhaps antibodies or mammal immune cells sticking to its mouth
parts.
Movie about HIV attachment.
gp20 and gp41, it appears, are Pam3Cys-120 and Pam3Cys-41.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RO8MP3wMvqg

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18162176?ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
Biochem
Biophys Res Commun. 2008 Feb 29;367(1):41-6. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
Links
The Ixodes scapularis salivary
protein, salp15, prevents the association of HIV-1 gp120 and CD4.
Juncadella IJ,
Garg R,
Bates TC,
Olivera ER,
Anguita J.
Department of Veterinary and
Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 103 Paige Laboratory, 161
Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Ixodes scapularis salivary
protein, Salp15, inhibits CD4(+) T cell activation by binding to the most-extracellular
domains of the CD4 molecule, potentially overlapping with the gp120-binding
region. We now show that Salp15 inhibits the interaction of gp120 and CD4.
Furthermore, Salp15 prevents syncytia formation between HL2/3 (a stable HeLa
cell line expressing the envelope protein) and CD4-expressing cells. Salp15
prevented gp120-CD4 interaction at least partially through its direct
interaction with the envelope glycoprotein. A phage display library screen
provided the interacting residues in the C1 domain of gp120. These results
provide a potential basis to define exposed gp120 epitopes for the generation of
neutralizing vaccines.
https://www.aidsreagent.org/program_info.cfm#5

It is pretty difficult to tell
what is blocked by salp15, but if it prevents spirochetes from sticking to the
mouth parts of the tick, and if it is true that the lipid portion of the HIV
gp120 and gp41 is indeed Pam3Cys, then it would make sense that the tick saliva
component blocks Pam3Cys. We don't know. Either it is a bioweapons
secret or because of the insanity in Lymeland on the part of the perps sued by
the Connecticut Attorney General, no one is allowed to discover which end is up.
Would an antibody alone, such as
anti-OspA antibody, be enough to block the HIV "glyco"-proteins if the "glyco"
were the same as the OspA lipids?
ON MEDLINE, searching for Pam3Cys
and HIV or tripalmitoyl and HIV:
:
J Virol Methods.
1988 Dec;22(2-3):173-82.Links
Distinction between HIV-1 and HIV-2
infection using novel synthetic lipopeptide conjugates as antigens in enzyme
immunoassays.
Böltz T,
Hummel RP,
Tröger W,
Rübsamen-Waigmann H,
Biesert L,
Müller-Lantzsch N,
Koch P,
Bessler W,
Jung G.
Institut für Immunobiologie,
Universität Freiburg, F.R.G.
A novel immunoassay technique
using synthetic lipopeptide (Pam3Cys-Ser) linked to immunodominant peptide
domains of HIV-1 and HIV-2 envelope proteins as an antigen adsorbent has been
developed. Attachment of peptides to microtiter plates can be considerably
improved with this method by employing the hydrophobic properties of lipopeptide.
From the sera of 121 HIV-1 infected patients 117 reacted with
Pam3Cys-Ser-[HIV-1(598-609)cyclic disulfide]. Five of 5 HIV-2 positive sera were
positive with Pam3Cys-Ser-[HIV-2(593-603)cyclic disulfide]. Control sera failed
to react with these conjugates.
That 1988 report sort of speaks
for itself. OspA's type of lipids attached to some proteins associated
with the AIDS virus produced a product against which HIV positive patients had
antibodies.
Since we know the chronic
exposure to borrelial lipoproteins causes the immune suppression diseases known
as LYMErix disease® and chronic Lyme disease®, then a Pam3Cys vaccine might not
be a good idea for HIV prevention. We don’t know.
The typical vaccination strategy
(producing antibodies in humans) may have to be abandoned here, in HIV-land, if
human antibodies alone are not enough to prevent gp120 attachment to CD4+ cells.
If HIV vaccines fail because of antigenic variation, and the strategy at the
current time for Lyme vaccination is to produce multivalent OspA (Baxter, see:
http://www.actionlyme.org/WORMSER_INSISTS_LYME_A_KNEE_DISEASE.htm
then one wonders if they intend to produce a multivalent HIV vaccine. The
"selection pressure" of borreliosis, we think is simply the deliberate mechanism
of immune evasion which make Relapsing Fever organisms Relapsing Fever
organisms. The plasmid encoded DNA constantly undergo antigenic variation,
but generally, the plasmid surface antigen code for the TYPES of antigens
generally remain the same (example: there is a gene for OspC which attaches to
integrins or red blood cells, it is believed, but OspA attaches to something
like chitinous tissue. We don't expect OspC to mutate, like for example,
so drastically that it becomes OspA.).
For some reason, the selection
pressure forcing changes in borrelia spirochetal surface antigens is more
dramatically observed, than, for example, among influenzas. I myself,
can't capture all the variables, here. I suppose it would take years and
years of training, and reading the work of Donald C. Wiley to see where we are
on what we know about infectious organisms mutations adding virulence, and also
know all there is to know about human immunity. The latter is clearly an
impossibility. That's why it is so hard to fathom any of these Lyme
criminals could ever have thought they could put this disease into a neat little
box. And then dare to say the box actually contains, the ever infamous,
NOTHING!
Let’s assume mice are more
accustomed to eating dirt, rotting food particles, and animal poopies than
humans, since OspA comes from E. coli. There is not a record of
OspA vaccination causing immune suppression in mice, although Gary Wormser
published that it caused immune suppression in dogs. So, just because it
produced a prolonged immune response in mice, one cannot and should not have
assumed the same principle applied to humans or even primates (primates do not
cook their meat, if they eat meat). Also, rotting food with molds on it, are
not part of the usual human diet. Perhaps it would be better if we did consume
a little rot as young children since adult autoimmune diseases appear to be a
function of later-life exposures. Childhood allergies could be due to the
confluence of non-dirt-exposure, a sedentary lifestyle, and immune dysregulation
from multiple vaccinations. Whatever the root reasons for these epidemics, the
discovery of them has not been helped by social engineering, BigInsurance and
BigPharma. Epidemics of childhood diseases such as allergies could be a
function of hyperprotection as much as they are global warming and emerging
infectious diseases. The point here being, this lying, profit-driven and
Kaiser-driven medicine destroys not only medicine, but the adult intellectual
potential in children, decreasing the likelihood that these disasters can be
managed adequately by our children.
I choke over the word
“protection” because I almost sound like Simon Wessely when he accuses the Gulf
War Illness Vets of being fairies, especially since it is truer that GWI is due
to vaccinal “protection,” DEET, and nerve agent antidote prophylaxis
"protection":
http://www.actionlyme.org/ROCKET_SCIENCE.htm
The bottom line is, did the
HIV vaccines, if they have Pam3Cys on them, not work for the same reason
OspA vaccination did not work?
Could years of research been
put back on the right path in both of these diseases, starting in 1992, when
this lymphocyte abnormality was first recognized by Paul Duray if it was
followed up on instead of suppressed?
The suppression of the
suppression data, is the crux of the Lyme Cryme.
Paul Duray is a plain old
genuine bioweaponeer.
Sweeg never was. He cut
himself out of the loop due to psychopathy.
Then he started just making
it all up in his head.
