On this issue of women priests:
the
Catholic Church is against it for the reason that women tend to be petty,
gossiping, back-stabbing airheads. It is assumed that if there was a
woman priest, the women in the pews would be more pre-occupied with the appearance of the woman priest than what the female priest is saying.
This is undeniable and as an example, take Lyme activism. The
activists are mostly women, but due to the petty, backstabbing idiocy, we
can't work together. For example, Pat Smith of the
Lymediseaseassociation.org has a stated purpose of destroying Karen
Forschner of the Lyme Disease Foundation (Lyme.org) and she has been pretty
much successful at it. Pat Smith's legions did the opposite of
whatever Action Item I proposed for the group,
ActionLyme. ILADS.org on whose
board Pat Smith sat for years (despite not being any kind of a scientist)
has not published a scientific article since I wrote their essence of their
Klempner rebuttal (including the scientific
evidence, the data, which showed Dearborn was a scientific hoax) in 2001.
The likes of Pat Smith and her pinheads is the exact reason the Catholic
Church will not allow women priests. It is in the nature of
most women to be pinheaded, opinionated, and most of all jealous
idiots.
Not me, of course. I have reversed
brain hemisphere dominance; "very superior"
visual-spatial abilities, which I claim to some degree comes from a desire to know HOW STUFF WORKS, as opposed to what color nail polish to
wear, and even more obvious, how popular I am. If I give all this
scanned-in scientific information away free, it's obviously not ALL ABOUT
MEEee. If it was ALL ABOUT MEEeee, I would write a
book and
charge people 25 dollars for the same information. On the other hand,
if I was ALL ABOUT MEEeee, I would not be smart enough to write the
right book, since wisdom comes to the charitable. Wisdom comes to the
un-vain and un-greedy and un-cowardly. You can't be smart and selfish
at the same time. (The Neocons, psychiatrists, and lawyers are good
other examples.)
Nevertheless, Catholics in America are
making a fuss about priest sexuality and women priests, unawares, are they,
that doctrinally, and logically, women would be a distraction from
theological endeavors. It is not that any single woman is incapable of
the theology, I am saying WOMEN, the group, would be a disruption
because the rest of the non-priest females would be, well, jerks about it.
It's pretty true. I would have to agree based on my own life's
experience. Women are pretty tough on each other. Men are not so
tough on each other.
Watch my videos.
◄ This is How Not To Be A Self-Centered Asshole Or Drama Queen.
It's about the DATA, not the presentor.
Our incompetent Lyme activism is the perfect
expression of the reason the Catholic Church won't allow women to be
priests.
Here are the only two other people in the
Lyme arena who do Lyme activism and give information away for no fee and not
for the self-benefit of a Project for Greenwich Housewives; for them Lyme activism is also
just
about getting the job done. These are both very credible Average
Joes, and that's really all we need to represent us- PLAIN OLD REGULAR
AMERICANS:
◄Hartford's Randy Sykes http://www.ctlymedisease.org/ with
Steve
Erickson and
Dottie Heffron, Illinois Lyme Crusader who are behind the
www.lymecryme.com website.
Dottie
is the producer of :
http://www.lymecryme.com/rich_text_18.htm ◄ This PowerPoint presentation of
the Lyme crooks' self-ass-biting, and where
Raymond Dattwyler says to the FDA - and
you can see from a 1994 FDA transcript - that the "seronegative Lyme
victims are the sickest."
Randy on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tO-TVfeSTU
Says Dottie:
This spring Heffron has been going door-to-door distributing her flyers
alerting people to Lyme disease.
“What kind of person would I be if I didn’t tell other people?”
she asked me.
“So
far, no one has shut the door in my face.”