|
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030718-012134-4422r
UPI Investigates: The vaccine
conflict
By Mark Benjamin
Investigations Editor
Published 7/20/2003 8:45 AM
View printer-friendly version
WASHINGTON, July 20 (UPI) -- The
screaming started four hours after
8-month-old
Chaise Irons received a vaccination
against rotavirus, recommended in
June 1998
by the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention for every infant to
prevent
serious diarrhea.
Within a day he was vomiting and
eliminating blood. Doctors performed
emergency
surgery, saving him by repairing his
intestines, which were folding in on
one
another. A doctor later figured out
the vaccine caused Chaise's problem.
In October 1999, after 15 reports of
such incidents, the CDC withdrew its
recommendation for the vaccination
-- not because of the problem, the
agency
claims, but because bad publicity
might give vaccines in general a bad
name.
But a four-month investigation by
United Press International found a
pattern of
serious problems linked to vaccines
recommended by the CDC -- and a web
of
close ties between the agency and
the companies that make vaccines.
Critics say those ties are an unholy
alliance in a war against disease
where
vaccine side effects have damaged,
hurt or killed people, mostly
children.
"The CDC is a disgrace. It is a
corrupt organization," said Stephen
A. Sheller,
a Philadelphia attorney who has sued
vaccine makers for what he says were
bad
vaccines. "The drug companies have
them on their payroll."
The CDC, based in Atlanta, said it
is committed to fighting disease and
balancing vaccine side effects.
"Our goal is to protect the public
health from both disease and from
serious
adverse events," said Dr. Walter
Orenstein, director of the CDC's
National
Immunization Program.
The agency sets the U.S. childhood
immunization schedule, or the list
of shots
pediatricians give children. Some
states say kids can't go to public
school
unless they have had CDC-endorsed
vaccines.
Since the mid-1980s the agency has
doubled the number of vaccines
children get,
up to nearly 40 doses before age 2.
The CDC also tracks possible side
effects,
along with the Food and Drug
Administration. This puts the agency
in the
awkward position of evaluating the
safety of its own recommendations.
An advisory committee of outside
experts helps the CDC make vaccine
recommendations. UPI found:
-- In two cases in the past four
years, vaccines endorsed by the CDC
were
pulled off the market after a number
of infants and adults appear to have
suffered devastating side effects,
and some died. Critics now worry
about a
possible link between vaccines and
autism, diabetes, asthma and sudden
infant
death syndrome, among other
ailments.
-- Members of the CDC's Vaccine
Advisory Committee get money from
vaccine
manufacturers. Relationships have
included: sharing a vaccine patent;
owning
stock in a vaccine company; payments
for research; getting money to
monitor
manufacturer vaccine tests; and
funding academic departments.
-- The CDC is in the vaccine
business. Under a 1980 law, the CDC
currently has
28 licensing agreements with
companies and one university for
vaccines or
vaccine-related products. It has
eight ongoing projects to
collaborate on new
vaccines.
The situation, while legal, gives
critics plenty of reason to worry
that
vaccine side effects are worse than
CDC officials say.
"When you take a look at the
ever-increasing numbers of doses of
vaccines
babies have gotten over the past two
decades and you see this
corresponding
rise in chronic disease and
disability in our children, it is
out of control,"
said Barbara Loe Fisher, president
of the National Vaccine Information
Center,
which does not accept money from
vaccine manufacturers.
She worries that vaccines might be
linked to ballooning rates of
chronic
illness like autism, which has
increased tenfold since the
mid-1980s, and
asthma, which has more than doubled
since 1980.
Fisher's group wants to overhaul the
mass vaccination system.
"The CDC has a very hard time
investigating in an unbiased way
what is
happening to our children because of
ideological and financial conflicts
of
interest," she said. Fisher believes
a vaccine injured her son in the
1980s.
Developing a vaccine can cost a half
a billion dollars. A recommendation
by the
CDC guarantees a market and a 1986
law limits manufacturers' liability
for side
effects.
The annual global market for
vaccines is expected to go from $6
billion today
to $10 billion by 2006.
The CDC said the best vaccine
advisers often have ties to the
industry, making
potential conflicts unavoidable.
Agency officials review possible
conflicts.
"The issue of safety is critical and
you need people extremely
knowledgeable
about safety to develop the best
policy formulations," said
Orenstein. The
agency has to weigh possible side
effects against dangerous disease.
"We need
to put safety data in context with
risk-of-disease data," he said.
The agency said ethics officials
also review partnerships with
companies to
make new vaccines.
"Each one of those proposed
activities is reviewed by the CDC's
ethics
officials, by our office of general
counsel, and by me to make sure that
there
are no conflicts of interest," said
Dixie Snider, CDC associate director
for
science.
Andrew Watkins, director of the
CDC's Technology Transfer Office,
negotiates
licensing agreements with outside
companies. He said agency scientists
routinely leave to work with vaccine
manufacturers.
"It does happen that some of our
inventors end up working for a
manufacturer,"
Watkins said. "In fact, we consider
that a wonderful tool of technology
transfer, although we do lose a good
scientist."
But Watkins said very little money
actually changes hands, making it
unlikely
to influence the CDC. He said
companies, including vaccine makers,
only gave
the CDC around $1 million last year
to work on collaborative projects
and the
agency only got $150,000 last year
in licensing fees.
"We are a real cheap date," Watkins
said.
Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., who has
been investigating vaccines for four
years,
said conflicts at the CDC are a
problem, particularly on the vaccine
advisory
panel. He believes vaccines
triggered his grandson's autism.
"This presents a real paradox when
the CDC routinely allows scientists
with
blatant conflicts of interest to
serve on influential advisory
committees that
make recommendations on new
vaccines, as well as policy
matters," Burton told
UPI. "All the while these same
scientists have financial ties,
academic
affiliations, and other vested
interests in the products and
companies for
which they are supposed to be
providing unbiased oversight."
Because of concern over vaccine side
effects, Congress in 1986 passed a
law
setting up a database at the CDC to
track reports from doctors,
manufacturers
and the public of possible side
effects from vaccines that started
in 1991.
As of the end of last year, the
system contained 244,424 total
reports of
possible reactions to vaccines,
including 99,145 emergency room
visits, 5,149
life-threatening reactions, 27,925
hospitalizations, 5,775
disabilities, and
5,309 deaths, according to data
compiled by Dr. Mark Geier, a
vaccine
researcher in Silver Spring, Md. The
data represents roughly 1 billion
doses of
vaccines, according to Geier.
The reports do not necessarily show
that a vaccine caused a problem.
The pain of Rotashield
The CDC's Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices, ACIP, helps
the agency
decide what vaccines are safe enough
to recommend. It is made up of 12
experts
from hospitals, universities and
state health departments.
In June 1998, the committee
recommended that all infants be
vaccinated against
rotavirus. The virus causes bad
diarrhea that can be fatal.
At the time, vaccine maker Wyeth had
a vaccine called Rotashield. Merck
hoped
to soon follow with its own version.
Wyeth ended up pulling its vaccine
off the U.S. market in October 1999
after it
was suspected of causing an
excruciating contortion where a
child's large
intestine folds over the small one.
Emergency surgery is sometimes
required to prevent death. That was
the case
with 8-month-old Chaise Irons.
"Chaise was vomiting blood and blood
was coming out of his stool," said
his
mother, Jayne Irons, from her home
in Malibu, Calif. Doctors performed
emergency surgery to repair Chaise's
intestines, saving his life.
Jayne said she never questioned her
doctor's advice to give Chaise the
vaccine.
"I had no reason to doubt anybody. I
am such a believer in vaccinations,"
Irons
said.
The Irons' will get $25,000 for
Chaise's injuries from a government
compensation program.
For Rotashield, the CDC's public
database contains 664 total reports
possibly
caused by the vaccine, including 288
emergency room visits, 63
life-threatening
reactions, 232 hospitalizations, 10
disabilities and eight deaths.
"Eight deaths," said Jayne Irons.
"You just have to thank God that you
are not
one of the deaths."
Republican staff on the House
Government Reform Committee looked
into the CDC
panel that recommended the
vaccination. Their August 2001
report found that
"four out of eight CDC advisory
committee members who voted to
approve
guidelines for the rotavirus vaccine
in June 1998 had financial ties to
pharmaceutical companies that were
developing different versions of the
vaccine."
A transcript from that June 1998
meeting shows the committee voted
down an
effort by one member to phase in the
vaccine because of concern over
possible
bad side effects. "I'm still a
little concerned about the safety
issues," Marie
Griffin from Vanderbilt University
said before that vote.
When asked, members of the committee
told UPI their potential conflicts
do not
affect their judgment.
"I am probably just the kind of
person you are talking about," said
Paul Offit,
chief of infectious diseases at the
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia,
who
was a committee member until last
month. At the same time, he shared a
patent
for another rotavirus vaccine. Merck
has funded Offit's research for 13
years.
"I am a co-holder of a patent for a
(rotavirus) vaccine. If this vaccine
were
to become a routinely recommended
vaccine, I would make money off of
that,"
Offit said. "When I review safety
data, am I biased? That answer is
really
easy: absolutely not."
"Is there an unholy alliance between
the people who make recommendations
about
vaccines and the vaccine
manufacturers? The answer is no."
Merck bought and delivers copies of
Offit's book, "What Every Parent
Should
Know About Vaccines," to American
doctors. The book has a list price
of $14.95.
"Merck Vaccine Division is pleased
to present you with a copy of the
recent
publication, 'What Every Parent
Should Know About Vaccines,'" says a
Dear
Doctor letter from Merck. "The
authors designed the book to answer
questions
parents have about vaccines and to
dispel misinformation about vaccines
that
sometimes appears in the public
media."
Offit said he does not know how many
copies of his book Merck purchased.
"I
don't have any control over that,"
he said.
The 2001 Government Reform
Committee's investigation noted
potential conflicts
with another committee member. The
chairman of the CDC's Vaccine
Advisory
Committee, Dartmouth Medical School
Professor Dr. John Modlin, owned
$26,000 in
Merck stock.
In a telephone interview with UPI,
Modlin said he had sold that stock,
but that
he had recently agreed to chair a
committee to oversee Merck vaccine
clinical
trials. Modlin, who was the
committee chairman until last month,
said he does
not know how much compensation he
receives from that post, but that
Merck "pays
my expenses" to attend meetings.
In October 1999, the committee
reversed its recommendation that all
infants
should get rotavirus vaccinations.
Modlin said the vaccine was safe
enough, but
the committee reversed itself out of
concern that bad press over
Rotashield
might make some people stop getting
vaccinated altogether.
"There could be some spill-over
effects that would have a net
negative effect,"
Modlin said. "I thought that was the
committee's finest hour."
Meeting transcripts over the past
decade showed that at some meetings,
half of
the members present had potential
conflicts with vaccine
manufacturers.
The CDC said that in October 2002 it
adopted new guidelines for
participating
on that advisory committee that in
the future will preclude people with
conflicts like Offit's from sitting
on the committee.
"We learned from that experience
(with rotavirus) and have now put in
force
more stringent criteria recently so
we do not nominate people with those
kinds
of conflicts," said the CDC's
Snider.
At the June 2002 committee meeting
-- the last meeting for which
minutes are
available -- four of the 11 members
present acknowledged conflicts with
Wyeth,
GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer,
Bayer and Aventis Pasteur. Two of
the four did
research or vaccine trials for
manufacturers. One of the four was a
co-holder
of a vaccine patent as well as a
consultant to Merck.
At odds over autism
At 8:05 a.m. on Monday, July 16,
2001, a vaccine safety committee of
the
influential Institute of Medicine
convened a public meeting at the
Charles
Hotel in Cambridge, Mass.
The purpose: to discuss whether
CDC-recommended vaccines might be
responsible
for a wave of autism and
neurological problems in tens of
thousands of American
children during the 1990s.
The concern: most vaccines contained
a mercury-based preservative called
thimerosal. Too much mercury has
known toxic effects on the brain.
Since the mid 1980s, the number of
childhood vaccinations recommended
by the
CDC had nearly doubled. The agency
recommends nearly 40 doses of
vaccines for
children today. Also since the
mid-1980s the autism rate in the
United States
had soared by 10 times to an
astonishing one child in every 300.
Cause and effect or coincidence?
The vaccine manufacturers deny any
connection, but the Institute of
Medicine --
part of the National Academy of
Sciences and a key adviser to the
federal
government on medical concerns --
wanted to hear from Dr. Thomas
Verstraeten, a
CDC expert on the issue.
When Verstraeten appeared before the
committee, he made a surprise
opening
statement.
"First, I should mention that as of
8 a.m. European time I have been
employed
by a vaccine manufacturer,"
Verstraeten told the panel,
according to a
transcript. "That means since 2 a.m.
American time," just hours before he
spoke
on behalf of the CDC.
Verstraeten had been working at the
CDC on a study of 76,659 children to
determine if thimerosal might be
causing neurological problems like
autism.
Signs of autism usually show up
around age 2. Sometimes children who
had
previously appeared to interact
normally will suddenly regress,
become
withdrawn and stop responding to
their parents and the outside world.
They may
perform repetitive motions, like
spinning or flapping their arms,
have
seizures, scream uncontrollably and
resist physical touch.
Manufacturers had used thimerosal,
which contains ethyl-mercury, as a
preservative in multi-dose vials of
vaccine. The vials allow needles to
be
inserted repeatedly and the vaccine
drawn out. The vials are cheaper
than
packaging doses of vaccine
separately, without thimerosal.
Depending on what vaccines a child
got during that period, a visit to
the
doctor during the 1990's may have
exposed some children to 125 times
the limit
on mercury set by the Environmental
Protection Agency.
A February 2000 draft of
Verstraeten's study, obtained by
United Press
International, appears to show that
thimerosal might cause brain
problems.
That draft cites "increasing risks
of neurological developmental
disorders with
increasing cumulative exposure to
thimerosal."
"We can state that this analysis
does not rule out that receipt of
thimerosal-containing vaccine in
children under 3 months of age may
be related
to an increased risk of neurologic
developmental disorders," the study
said.
To discuss the findings in
Verstraeten's study, the CDC
convened a meeting at
the Simpsonwood Retreat Center in
Norcross, Ga., on June 7-8, 2000.
The agency
invited vaccine experts and
representatives of four vaccine
manufacturers.
After discussing that study, Dr.
David Johnson, a Michigan state
public health
officer advising the CDC on
vaccines, said that the findings
were troubling,
according to a transcript.
"My gut feeling? It worries me
enough," said Johnson. "I do not
want (my)
grandson to get a
thimerosal-containing vaccine until
we know better what is
going on."
Later in the same conversation, CDC
officials agreed to keep the study
private.
"We have been privileged so far that
given the sensitivity of
information, we
have been able to manage to keep it
out of, let's say, less responsible
hands,"
said Bob Chen, head of CDC's Vaccine
Safety and Development unit.
Dr. Roger Bernier, who was then
CDC's associate director for
science,
responded, "I think if we will all
just consider this embargoed
information, if
I can use that term."
The CDC's Walter Orenstein said the
agency wanted to look hard at the
study
before discussing it in public, not
cover it up. The CDC never published
a
study based on the data, but said it
would soon.
GlaxoSmithKline declined UPI's
request to interview Verstraeten
from Rixensart,
Belgium, but Orenstein said
Verstraeten left the CDC to move
back to Europe.
For Lara Bono of Durham, N.C., the
connection between vaccines with
thimerosal
and her son's autism is obvious.
Bono said her son Jackson began to
change drastically within days of
receiving
a group of thimerosal-containing
vaccinations.
Bono says that on Aug. 14, 1990,
four days after receiving the last
of a group
of shots, 16-month-old Jackson was
becoming withdrawn. Within two weeks
he
stopped responding or acknowledging
his parents. Two weeks after that
Jackson
no longer would make eye contact. It
soon became difficult to get Jackson
to
eat or sleep. He has had bouts of
spinning uncontrollably and
seizures.
"Fast forward another couple of
months and he was gone. The mercury
was in his
brain," Bono said.
Years later, Bono discovered that at
one point, Jackson's mercury
exposure may
have been more than 40 times the
limit set by the EPA. Nine years
later, Bono
says, Jackson was diagnosed with
mercury poisoning she says came from
the
vaccines.
Boyd Haley, chairman of the
Chemistry Department at the
University of Kentucky,
has done studies that he says show
some children with autism do not
excrete
harmful mercury from vaccines, but
keep it in their bodies. He says the
CDC
knows the vaccines the agency
recommended may have harmed a
generation of
children.
"I know that they know and that is
what bothers me more than anything
else,"
Haley said. "You can't do a study
showing it (thimerosal) is safe. It
is just
too damn toxic."
In June of 2000, the agency's
Vaccine Advisory Committee signed on
to a
statement calling for the removal of
thimerosal from vaccines "because
any
potential risk from mercury is of
concern."
"However, there remains no
convincing evidence of harm caused
by low levels of
thimerosal in vaccines," the
statement said.
In October 2001, the Institute of
Medicine panel that heard from
Verstraeten
found that it is "biologically
plausible" that thimerosal causes
autism, but
that, "current scientific evidence
neither proves nor disproves a
link."
To avoid any conflict of interest,
that panel specifically excludes
"anyone who
had participated in research on
vaccine safety, received funding
from vaccine
manufacturers or their parent
companies, or served on Vaccine
Advisory
Committees."
Laid low by Lyme vaccine
The rotavirus recommendation is not
the only controversial call made by
the
CDC. Another involves a vaccine to
fight Lyme disease, a tick-borne
illness
that can cause profound fatigue,
headache, fever and severe muscle
pain.
"It was after the booster shot that
I absolutely collapsed," said Lewis
Bull, a
farmer from East Lyme, Conn. Bull,
now 49, volunteered in 1996 to take
shots
during a clinical study for a new
vaccine to prevent Lyme disease
developed by
SmithKline Beecham, now
GlaxoSmithKline. Clinical studies
are tests on humans
to make sure vaccines are safe and
work before going on the market.
In the study, Bull first received
placebo shots containing no vaccine
and felt
fine.
But soon after his second shot of
the real vaccine he began to suffer
from
debilitating arthritis, memory loss
and fatigue. Some doctors believe
the Lyme
vaccine side effects mirror the
disease itself.
"For the first six months I could
not get out of bed. The memory loss
was
incredible. I've played guitar all
my life and I could not remember how
to play
guitar. I could not find the town
hall and I used to go there four
times a
week," he said in a recent telephone
interview.
Bull said his fatigue was so severe
he would sleep for stretches of 22
hours or
more. Without medical insurance,
Bull was forced to sell his farm.
On Feb. 18, 1999, the CDC endorsed
Lyme disease vaccine for people age
15-70
who work or recreate in possible
tick-infested areas.
By October of 2000, more than 1.4
million people had received the
vaccine,
according to the CDC.
But 19 months later, in February
2002, SmithKline Beecham pulled the
vaccine
off the market because "sales of
LYMERIX are insufficient to justify
the
continued investment."
The company also faced hundreds
lawsuits by people who said they
suffered side
effects, many similar to Lewis
Bull's.
Although he never sued, Bull said he
complained to the CDC to report what
he
says were obvious side effects from
the vaccine, called LYMERIX.
The government's database of
possible side effects for LYMERIX
lists 640
emergency room visits, 34
life-threatening reactions, 77
hospitalizations, 198
disabilities and six deaths after
people took the shots since the CDC
endorsed
it.
According to CDC meeting transcripts
where the advisory committee weighed
its
recommendation, five of 10 committee
members disclosed their financial
conflicts of interest with vaccine
manufactures. Three of the five had
conflicts of interest with
SmithKlineBeecham.
The committee ignored a plea from a
consumer advocate to delay a
recommendation
on LYMERIX because it might not be
safe, according to a February 1999
transcript.
"We are just saying there is a
wealth of information out there that
is
different than the information you
have been provided. I think the
honorable
thing to do would be to wait," said
Karen Vanderhoof-Forschner, founder
of the
Lyme Disease Foundation, a patient's
advocacy group that eventually
opposed the
vaccine.
UPI found that the CDC and
SmithKline Beecham worked together
on a Lyme
vaccine. A 1992 CDC activity report
obtained by UPI says the agency had
an
agreement "with SmithKline Beecham
that currently funds three positions
at (the
CDC) for the purpose of providing
information of use in developing
advanced
test methods and vaccine
candidates."
In June 2001, the General Accounting
Office delivered a report to Sen.
Chris
Dodd, D-Conn., on this issue. It
says that CDC employees "are listed
on two
Lyme-disease related patents"
including "a 1993 joint patent
between CDC and
SmithKline Beecham Corporation." The
report also said that six of 12
consultants working for the CDC on
Lyme vaccines "reported at least one
interest related to a vaccine firm."
Do babies need Hep B?
In 1991 the CDC recommended that all
infants get their first Hepatitis B
vaccination just hours after birth.
The disease is mostly spread from
dirty
needles and unprotected sex. It can
create deadly liver disease.
The vaccine has been blamed for
mysterious deaths following the
shots,
sometimes filed as sudden infant
death syndrome.
One is the Sept. 16, 1998, death of
Lyla Rose Belkin at age 5 weeks. She
died
15 hours after getting her second
Hepatitis B vaccine booster shot.
Michael Belkin said in a telephone
interview from Seattle that his
daughter was
lively and alert prior to receiving
the shot. She became agitated and
noisy,
suddenly fell asleep, and died 15
hours later. Belkin said the coroner
indicated that his daughter's brain
was swollen; a reaction some
researchers
believe could be caused by the
vaccine.
"So in the CDC and (the Vaccine
Advisory Committee's) own words,
almost every
newborn U.S. baby is now greeted on
its entry into the world by a
vaccine
injection against a sexually
transmitted disease for which the
baby is not at
risk -- because they couldn't get
the junkies, prostitutes,
homosexuals and
promiscuous heterosexuals to take
the vaccine," Belkin told a
congressional
panel on May 18, 1999.
"Parents need to understand that the
system providing the vaccines
injected
into their children's veins is
corrupt and scientifically flawed,"
Belkin told
UPI. "Parents should do their own
homework and investigate this
question: What
is the risk of getting a severe
neurological vaccine adverse
reaction versus
the risk of getting neurological
complications from the disease?"
The CDC's files contain 32,731 total
reports of possible reactions
following
Hepatitis B vaccinations since 1991,
including 10,915 emergency room
visits,
685 life-threatening reactions,
3,700 hospitalizations, 1,200
disabilities and
618 deaths.
In October 2002, the Institute of
Medicine reported that the "evidence
is
inadequate" to prove or disprove
that some vaccines might be behind
some cases
of SIDS, and called for more
research.
The CDC says, "There is no confirmed
evidence which indicates that
hepatitis B
vaccine can cause chronic
illnesses."
Some of the officials involved in
the agency's 1991 decision to
recommend that
all infants receive the Hepatitis B
vaccine also had close ties to
vaccine
manufacturers.
Dr. Sam Katz was the advisory
committee chairman at the time. A
professor at
Duke, Katz said 30 percent of
children who get the disease get it
from unknown
causes, possibly in daycare.
He said the CDC tried to give the
shots to teens, but it was hard to
get them
to show up for all three doses.
"So they said, 'Well, we've got a
captive audience and we want to give
it to
the newborns anyways.'"
Katz developed a measles vaccine now
manufactured by Merck, which also
manufactures a Hepatitis B vaccine.
Katz said when he was chairman of
the
committee in 1991 he also worked as
a paid consultant for Merck, Wyeth
and most
major vaccine manufacturers.
He said conflicts do not pose a real
problem.
"I think it has increasingly become
a problem, but it is a perceived
problem,
not a real problem," Katz said.
Another member of the committee in
1991 was Dr. Neal Halsey, director
of the
division of disease control at Johns
Hopkins University. He continued to
advise
the committee throughout the rest of
that decade, as did Katz.
Halsey is a former CDC employee who
has done research paid for by most
of the
major vaccine manufacturers. When he
testified before the House
Government
Reform Committee in 1999, he
disclosed a salary at that time for
work on a Lyme
vaccine.
He also established the Johns
Hopkins Institute for Vaccine
Safety, started in
part with "unrestricted educational
grants in 1997 from several vaccine
manufacturers and some private
donations," according to Halsey.
Congressional
investigators said that support
included $50,000 in start-up funds
from Merck
and a payment from Wyeth. Halsey
said vaccine manufacturers do not
fund the
center's vaccine education
activities.
Halsey said the CDC needs experts
like him to get the best advice.
"In order to get the people with
experience, you need people who have
done the
research," Halsey said in a
telephone interview. "To do that,
you have to have
people who have done research for
vaccine manufacturers."
Halsey said, however, that the CDC
should not recommend vaccines and
evaluate
safety at the same time.
"I think it is a problem and I think
it would be better if an independent
body
evaluated safety," Halsey said.
Copyright © 2001-2003 United Press
International
[Non-text portions of this message
have been removed]
|