The Lyme
RICO (ALDF.com) required
False Claims to the
United States Government:
The role
Kaiser-Permanente played was at New York Medical College, where John
Connolly, the former
head of this former Catholic Medical School sold them
out, went
on to be the Chairman of the ALDF.com,
started
his own false-front of a publishing company
(CastleConnolly.com), and published that "BigInsurance
is just taking
over medicine and the
MD groups are going to get used to the idea."
Kaiser is still at New York Medical College training MDs under an
arrangement like the
Military, where Kaiser
will give a tuition kickback for people who sign on
to be Kaiser Drones.
Kaiser supplies the OPMC with
their "experts."
The OPMC allegedly drank this Kaiser-experts
Kool-Aid because New York State employees
were heavily invested in New York
Biotech, presumably
to some degree upon the advice of John J. Connolly,
since he was somehow
involved in New York Health
and New York Business and New York Biotech. Not
being a scientist,
Connolly was probably told a whole
bunch of bullshit by Kaiser.
Lastly, this cabal probably had some assurance from the CDC that they would
play along, since the CDC has
long been partnered with Kaiser-Permanente, although we don't know why.
It's probably some CFR good-buddies
arrangement, accounting for the presence of Mort Zuckerman and the AIG
Greenbergs in the ALDF gang.
1) CHARGE: The
Steere/European/Dearborn diagnostic standard is fraudulent and
was meant to
a) falsely qualify LYMErix and
b) set up a monopoly on what is in human blood (new diseases, genetic
susceptibilities to diseases), since Yale's L2 Diagnostics, Imugen, and
Corixa were to be the only ones qualified to test for VBDs after LYMErix was
on the market. LYMErix Western
Blots were unreadable with the OspA-B plasmid in the standard borrelia.
The central RICO patent was US Patent 6,045,804.
Corixa did the majority of the advertising for Yale, Schoen and Allen
Steere's little monopoly.
1)
Yale's Bb Flagellin Patent, 5.618,533
2) Yale's
LYMErix Patent, 5,747,294
3) Padula,
UCONN, 5,620,862 B31 = Low or No OspC- associated
with brain invasion
4) CDC
officer Alan Barbour and "Immune System is Overwhelmed," US Patent
6,719,983-
5) Tufts,
Huber, 6,689,364 "LYMErix is a toxin"
6) Persing,
Mayo Clinic, Monopoly Patent-6,045,804
7)
CDC's patents with SmithKline in Europe which shows
they know the Steere method is bogus.
8) Barbour's flagella-less borrelia
patent
9) 1996 B. theileri patent (Master's Disease is Cow Relapsing
Fever)
Alan Barbour patent application for Master's
Disease 5,932,220
DAMAGES:
Defrauding the FDA and the public about the new, Dearborn definition of Lyme
increased the numbers of the permanent disabled who lost the
opportunity for early detection (the cabal did not use Yale' s US patent 5,
618, 533 method, which was valid), a lost opportunity for adequate discovery
in why the HIV vaccine failed, and discovery as to why Lyme was the New
Great Imitator: Pam3Cys-associated
immune suppression or tolerance to fungal antigens (through TLR2), the
resultant activation of latent viruses of all kinds (Epstein-Barr, Multiple
Sclerosis and cancers), and the tolerance-to-mycoplasma relationship to the
onset of ALS. NCI's and the US Army's Paul Duray recognized and informed
the ALDF/IDSA there was something wrong with the lymphocytes of chronic Lyme
victims in 1989 (IDSA REVIEWS) and
1992 (Cold Spring Harbor meeting).
Gary Wormser knew that OspA vaccination suppressed the immune system but he
still did not report this to the public or the FDA while this vaccine was
still on the market. He continued to pursue OspA as a vaccine through
Baxter.
Gary Wormser reporting the blunting of the
immune response in OspA vaccinated animals:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10865170?ordinalpos=5&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
"OspA interferes with the response of
lymphocytes to proliferative stimuli including a blocking of cell cycle
phase progression."
See more at
PAM3CYS_IMMUNE_SUPPRESSION.htm
If CDC & NIH
officers were involved in these crimes (and
they were) that's also THEFT OF HONEST SERVICES
2)
Biomarkers
discovered by the crooks, but not deployed by IDSA or Mark Klempner. This
includes all the data found in the 1989
IDSA Reviews, the ALS, cancer, and the MS data. If Mark Klempner knew
about the biomarkers but did not deploy them, while later stating that there
were no such signs of delirium in chronic Lyme victims, that's scientific
fraud, after delirium being stated as the reason for his MMPs studies,
that's scientific FRAUD. Everyone who declared that we Lyme victims were
not sick but just CRAZY, who knew about these biomarkers, committed physical
damages, death, permanent disability, slander, libel and perjury.
3) Mark
Klempner's 2001
fraudulent "long term treatment"
article is the basis of the IDSA phony "guidelines."
This includes a charge of scientific fraud with intent to cause harm
by deploying the non-scientific psychiatric morons to discredit us with
their abuse, imaginary bullshit, perjury, and
doubly-brain damaging psychotropics.
It is malpractice to treat a real brain disease with CNS depressants,
according to the American Psychiatric Association, as that makes the brain
damage worse. This is also libel, perjury and slander against Lyme
victims and their treaters.
There are numerous instances of fraud in this
Klempner article (see the next item), starting with Dearborn being
knowingly a fraudulent standard by anyone's definition, to deliberately
fraudulent use of "checklists," (BigInsurance knows psychiatry is a fraud, a
hoax, a collection of self-deluded but useful fools), to determining
outcomes, to the non-disclosure of which primers Klempner used.

Specific to the Klempner Krime, will be Arthur Weinstein's "Master
Validator" contributions to it: the "validation" of the FIQ for
Lyme, his phony chromatography"detector,"
and his proposal that the "more antibodies makes the method more
valid,." not to mention what he did at Dearborn and as regards his role
in the ImmuLyme trial.
A)
Weinstein "validating" the FIQ for
Lyme:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10513489?ordinalpos=3&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
A real validation of a method requires
that the method not detect two different analytes. This is something I
wrote about for the first ILADS Klempner rebuttal in June 2001, after
which (a year later), Stricker joined the rebuttal team and took over.
B)
Weinstein "validating" his own
Dearbornite concept that "more antibodies means more valid," which is
the opposite of the FDA's rules on the validation of a method:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8053960?ordinalpos=5&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
▲This is supposedly a "validation" that only hypersensitivity responses
or inflammatory responses could be considered disease processes, when
all along stealth disablers would have the property of a time bomb or a
Trojan Horse, or not be identified until later, as something else, like,
oh, a New Great Imitator.
C)
Weinstein
comes up with his own kind of
chromatography detector and
claims to be responsible for teaching MDs how to do chromatography,
which, if they were paying attention, would spit the sides of the CT
Separations Science Council (CSSC).
D)
Weinstein was supposedly in charge
of looking at the blots of the
ImmuLyme-sick cases.
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/216
Supported by Pasteur Mérieux
Connaught.
We are indebted to the members
of the data and safety
monitoring board: Arthur Weinstein, M.D. (chairman),
George Washington School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
??
'When none of the Western Blots of
OspA-vaccinated people were even readable, so we wonder how Weinstein
could be in charge of such a group and not have ever looked at the
"data," not to mention who threw out ImmuLyme's bad data (which would
be, at least partially, Gary Wormser's
responsibility and over which he was sued).
Now remember, through all of this, was
Durland Fish, who is not a scientist, but a bug-catcher. Fish was one
of the original founding four of the ALDF.com. NIH's Edward McSweegan
was Fish's tool and was apparently, the silent partner among the
founding three- John J. Connolly,
Gary Wormser and Durland Fish.
Crooks, being stupid, self-revealed themselves.
E)
Weinstein's central role at Dearborn, the scene of the crime.
◄ You can see that that is all bullshit, since, in fact, this clique
warped the FDA "Methods Validations" definitions (see the
Relapsing Fever
Homepage), and none of the labs agreed at all with the
Dressler/Steere recommendation (as I personally told the FDA Vaccine
Committee in January, 2001 and demonstrated in my 30 page
booklet that I gave the FDA Vaccine Committee members but which did not
get scanned into the FDA's website what else is new the FDA don't know
the difference between real data and the-man-in-the-moon), so this
Weinstein Dearborn bullshit is just plain lying bullshit.
No one agreed with Steere's proposal at
Dearborn and the Dressler/Steere prospective study showed only 39/54 of
the ARTHRITIS patients had anything close to Steere's
hypersensitivity, "more antibodies is more valid," proposal.
So, Weinstein was at the scene in every
part of the crime, playing the role of the "validator."
Now, this is something I would know
about since I am a real BigPharma chemist, and the "development and
validations of analytical methods" happens to be what I did
for a living at Pfizer.
4) a) The Patents tell
a different story, and
b) and the Primer Shell Game.
Mark Klempner
never published which DNA or RNA primers he used to determine "No Lyme" in
chronic Lyme victims, while simultaneously throwing out cases that were
positive after treatment in his "long-term treatment" "study." Meanwhile
Gary Wormser et al have demonstrated that they know what DNA and RNA primers
to use when they want to find borrelial DNA or RNA in ticks. So, to ever
thence, since 1992, use OspA primers to determine "Lyme," when they use
flagellin and RNA primers to find "borrelia" in humans, is
FRAUD.
This report shows that Gary Wormser has
known since 1992 which primers to used to detect borrelia:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=270592&blobtype=pdf
This report shows
that Robert Schoen has known since 1995 which primers to use to detect
borrelia:
http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/reprint/35/1/233?view=long&pmid=8968914
▲This is also the report that goes with the Persing RICO or the Persing
monopoly patent▼:
Persing, Mayo Clinic,
Monopoly Patent-6,045,804
5)
Brain-Permanent; all the
persistence past treatment or treatment failure articles by the crooks, of
which there are over 20. This despite IDSA/ALDF claims that Lyme is "easily
diagnosed and cured" and that "there is no such thing as chronic Lyme" is
self explanatory.
In addition, all the older data on Relapsing Fever
also says it is incurable and goes into a cyst form.
IDSA's Russell Johnson says the cyst
form may take months to reconstitute into tact spirochetes in BSK media.
That would be because the Mouse Infectivity Test would be better, and
all the IDSA crooks know it.
Yale's
James Phillips said this Lyme RICO
crime "should be written up in the New Yorker" magazine.
I will take a polygraph test, should the opportunity arise.
The American
Psychiatric Association's Guidelines on the Treatment of a Delirium make
it double malpractice to treat Lyme brain with psychotropics since
all psychotropics are brain damaging in and of
themselves.
Phillips can be
indicted with this RICO gang because he knew all about it, yet perjured
himself about myself in order to avoid a malpractice lawsuit. He said
under oath, that what I said about Yale and these crimes meant I was
"like Ted Kascynski" and "a chemist," after he said this RICO "should be
written up in The New Yorker."
That is obstruction of justice in addition to perjury and
malpractice.
So much for the talents of
Mr. Peanut.
So much for penis-worship.
So much for men being smarter than women.
So much for the Twilight Zone... where the
Modernists, actually, go.
So much for "enlightenment."
So much for
"Psychiatry and Philosophy"
The crime should be
charged by the Department of Justice as a RICO because Yale knew they
could not read their Western Blots in LYMErix vaccinated people in 1995, as
demonstrated by Yale's Robert Schoen crime, as well as false claims to the
United States or Qui Tam:
1) Schoen on the unreadable
Western Blots in 1995
2) Schoen instructing MDs to
blow off
LYMErix vaccine injury or failure cases in 1998.
Schoen never told
anyone he could not read his Western Blots in LYMErix vaccinated people. He
especially did not tell the FDA. But he mentioned in the Munchausen's book
that the blood should be sent to a RICO lab.
Corixa did all the advertising for the L2-Diagnostics, Imugen, and Corixa
RICO
Schoen also was
involved in the development of the RICO method:
The Lyme criminals could not
even read their Western Blots in LYMErix or ImmuLyme-vaccinated people,
yet they both claimed to have used the
Dearborn Method and MarDx test strips to assess their vaccines
outcomes:
Here are those 4 "we
can't read our OspA vaccine results" reports:
1)
SCHOEN and PERSING, with JOHN ANDERSON,1996 - the RICO
report:
http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/reprint/35/1/233?view=long&pmid=8968914
2) SCHOEN AND PERSING IN
THEIR 1996 RICO METHOD PATENT:
The Dave Persing, Mayo Clinic FRAUD
Patent-6,045,804
3) PERSING WITH SIGAL EXPLAINING THAT THE WESTERN BLOTS
WERE UNREADABLE, 2000:
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/313920
4) Yale's
ROBERT SCHOEN in the 1998
Munchausen's Book,
instructing MDs to blow off LYMErix systemically injured people ("but
send the post-vaccination blood to the Yale L2 Diagnostics RICO lab if
you must bother to be a physician").
This is a FALSE CLAIM or a QUI TAM or FRAUD
on the GOVERNMENT:
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00921.htm
They, Yale, Schoen, knew they could not
read their Western Blots in LYMErix-vaccinated people, but they wanted all
the national bloodwork sent to their labs (L2
Diagnostics and PolyGenomics), so they could patent, and pharm, and be
the only ones with access to the new vector borne diseases to patent, and be
the only ones with access to - nationally - genetic information about
disease susceptibilities (this has bioweapons applications).
The 1998 Vaccines Reports (ImmuLyme and
LYMErix):
LYMErix results (76% "safe and effective"):
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/209
ImmuLyme results
(92% "safe and effective"):
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/216
From the LYMErix trial, "categories of outcomes:"
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content-nw/full/339/4/209/T1