|
Pharma/CDC on Brain damage from vaccines, Fauci, Phages, Bioweapons manufacture HHS.gov is Incompetent; BMJ calls fraud "crime.")
Official: CFIDS and MS-Lyme are the
same disease; Epstein-Barr
ELISA = arbitrary cutoff. 1998, CIA Oilmen & Israelis plan to overthrow Saddam for the oil.
Bush/Gore Oil/War-(Oct,2000)
Iraq was an oil-theft war.
|
Besides the obvious: PubMed ID 9394822 "None of the mice previously immunized with OspA peptides were protected against experimental infection, in spite of the appearance of protective antibodies."
rOSPA WAS NOT A VACCINE 1) Yale did not demonstrate that there were not spirochetes in the ticks: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1608951&dopt=Abstract Elimination of
Borrelia burgdorferi from vector ticks
feeding on OspA-immunized mice.
2) To assess outcomes, use chromosomally and not plasmid-coded DNA: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8234271&dopt=Abstract Borrelia
burgdorferi is clonal: implications for
taxonomy and vaccine development.
3) rOspA vaccination results in escape mutants or variants spirochetes which INCREASE at a greater rate than normal. Selection of
variant Borrelia burgdorferi isolates
from mice immunized with outer surface
protein A or B.
4) Experiments in vitro in which complement is added demonstrate the antibodies to rOspA alone do not kill the spirochetes: Borrelia
burgdorferi escape mutants that survive
in the presence of antiserum to the OspA
vaccine are killed when complement is
also present.
5) OspA vaccination was not demonstrated to protect monkeys from infection: The outer surface
protein A (OspA) vaccine against Lyme
disease: efficacy in the rhesus monkey.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9413097&dopt=Abstract
6) rOspA vaccination did not protect rabbits: Comparison of
protection in rabbits against
host-adapted and cultivated Borrelia
burgdorferi following infection-derived
immunity or immunization with outer
membrane vesicles or outer surface
protein A. "Analysis of the antibody responses to outer membrane proteins, including DbpA, OspA, and OspC, suggests that the remarkable protection exhibited by the infection-immune rabbits is due to antibodies directed at antigens unique to or markedly up-regulated in host-adapted B. burgdorferi." Natural infection was better in infection-immune rabbits, because of adaptation to antigenic variation.
7) OspA was not shown to protect mice, and why, by Russell Johnson: Resistance to
tick-borne spirochete challenge induced
by Borrelia burgdorferi strains that
differ in expression of outer surface
proteins. There was no reduction of strain 297 spirochetes in ticks that fed on four hamsters immunized with M297, but the hamsters were protected. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8926082&dopt=Abstract The journal publications of Russell Johnson--> MEDLINE: "Johnson RC [au] and spirochete"
8) Other lipoprotein vaccine failures and activation of latent infection: The 19-kD antigen
and protective immunity in a murine
model of tuberculosis.
"These results are consistent with a model in which the presence of the 19-kD protein has a detrimental effect on the efficacy of vaccination with live mycobacteria."
The
19-kDa lipoprotein of M. tuberculosis,
expressed in M. vaccae or M. smegmatis
(M. smeg19kDa), abrogates this
protective immunity....Thus, the
immunosuppressive effect is dependent on
glycosylated and acylated 19-kDa
lipoprotein present in the phagosome
containing the mycobacterium. These
results suggest that the diminished
protection against challenge with M.
tuberculosis seen in mice vaccinated
with M. smegmatis expressing the 19-kDa
lipoprotein is the result of reduced TNF-alpha
and IL-12 production, possibly leading
to reduced induction of T-cell
activation. RELATED:
Benach and Radolf → Extremely high titers of OspA- antibody are necessary to be protective
POST LYMErix SYNDROME Vaccination with lipoprotein vaccines exacerbate infection and make the disease undetectable.
The evidence from the vaccine trial and adverse events reported afterwards, suggests rOspA activates latent infections. OspA is biologically active in the free form (1). OspA binds Plasminogen, an enzyme which degrades membranes OspA induces the expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (2) (causes immune suppression) Borreliosis, itself, is associated with activation of Epstein-Barr virus (3). Epstein-Barr virus is associated with B cell changes. Borreliosis is associated with B cell changes. (Dorward, Spleens ) Giving asymptomatically infected Borreliosis patients the vaccine therefore appears to have created a disaster, not the least of which is new neoplasms, not reported in this abstract, and likely not reported to the World Health Organization, because Yale wrote that they scewed the results to fit into WHO's adverse events listing. Mycoplasmal lipoprotein vaccine have failed to protect, in Tuberculosis. The lipoproteins seem to be related to fungi (that is, they are identical). Indeed, the mycobacterial lipoproteins of 19 and 35 kD tried as vaccine in tuberculosis seem to have the same negative effects as OspA "Thus, the immunosuppressive effect is dependent on glycosylated and acylated 19-kDa lipoprotein present in the phagosome containing the mycobacterium. These results suggest that the diminished protection against challenge with M. tuberculosis seen in mice vaccinated with M. smegmatis expressing the 19-kDa lipoprotein is the result of reduced TNF-alpha and IL-12 production, possibly leading to reduced induction of T-cell activation." ========= OspA and IL-10: MEDLINE
ActionLyme, 2001, Vaccine Presentation of Empirical Results, and that OspA was not a vaccine. It was not qualified with a valid standard http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf Pam Weintraub: http://www.whale.to/m/lymerix8.html LYME FOUNDATION Re LymeRIX LYME ASSOCIATION Re: LymeRIX ============================== 1) Binds a human degradive enzyme plasminogen and is active in the free form: Infection 1996 Mar-Apr;24(2):190-4
The
outer surface protein A (OspA) of
Borrelia burgdorferi: a vaccine
candidate and bioactive mediator. Which means, who knows what's happening to people who receive this as vaccination if this mechanism is at work.
2) Induces the antiiflammatory cytokine IL-10 (suppresses the immune response).
People with Lyme borreliosis often test positive to Epstein-Barr. That is, IgM to Epstein-Barr apparently "cross-reacts" with Borrelia burgdorferi OspC. That is, people who are infected with Borrelia, and who are "treated" to the CDC's Dearborn serodiagnostic criteria, and therefore told they have Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (Chronic Epstein-Barr), may have also activation of latent Epstein-Barr, as described here:
Interaction of Borrelia burgdorferi
sensu lato with Epstein-Barr virus in
lymphoblastoid cells.
3) "Blot-smudging" The question that arises is, if OspA is "sticky" (according to an Alan Barbour patent), how can we be sure free OspA molecules are the actual immunogen a person is injected with, if the outcome, in antibodies, is as below? It appears that clumps of OspA of various sizes are being injected into people. And if OspA is the reactive molecule it is claimed to be, how do we know it is not causing Immune complex vasculitis?, as part of the Post-LYMErix Syndrome? This same thing occurred in the Monkey trials of rOspA. It was not reported that this problem was addressed. http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal/issues/v31n1/991200/991200.html
Clinical
Infectious Diseases 2000;31:42-47 Detection of Multiple Reactive Protein Species by Immunoblotting after Recombinant Outer Surface Protein A Lyme Disease Vaccination Philip J. Molloy,1,2 Victor P. Berardi,2 David H. Persing,2,3,a and Leonard H. Sigall4 1Rheumatology Associates of Southeastern Massachusetts, Plymouth, and 2IMUGEN, Norwood, Massachusetts; 3Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and 4Division of Rheumatology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick
Received 31 August 1999; revised 3 December 1999; electronically published 17 July 2000.
For collection
of serum samples, there
was separate institutional review
board approval, and informed
consent was obtained from
the study subjects.
|